Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of Open and Short Defects in Embedded SRAM Using Parasitic Extraction Method for Deep Submicron Technology

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The technology advances from the micron level to the Nanometer level. This striking change in the technology with so many factors might influence the embedded device design and its performance. In the fast-growing technology, it is very difficult to find suitable algorithms to test embedded SRAM. It is noticed that while going to deep sub-nano technologies, the existing test methods may not fully satisfy the test results due to the increased number of faults and defects. Scale-down technologies have an impact on the parasitic effects, creating an additional source of faulty behavior, and making the existing test techniques less effective in detecting them. In this paper we propose a new method, taking the parasitic effect into the consideration, which gives the fault information along with its location. In the proposed method we have considered node-to-node open and short defects for different technologies (45 nm, 32 nm, and 7 nm). It is observed that the proposed test method gives 100% fault coverage which is independent of technology variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All simulation results are available with authors.

Code availability

All codes are available with authors.

References

  1. Dekker, R., Beenker, F., & Thijssen, L. (1990). A realistic fault model and test algorithms for static random access memory. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design, 9, 567–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Manoj, S., & Pineda de Gyvez, J. (2007) Defect-Oriented Testing for Nano-Metric CMOS VLSI Circuits. In Frontiers in Electronic Testing (FRET, Vol. 34). Springer.

  3. Niggemeyer, D., Redeker, M., & Otterstedt, J. (1998). Integration of Non-classical Faults in Standard March Tests. In Proceedings of international workshop on memory technology, design and testing.

  4. De Goor, A. J. V. (1993). Using march tests to test SRAMS. IEEE Design and test Computers, 10(1), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parvathi, M., Vasantha, N., & Satya Parasad, K. (2012). Modified march C—algorithm for embedded memory testing. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 2(5), 571–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mikitjuk, V. G., Yarmolik, V. N., & de Goor, A. J. V. (1996). RAM Testing Algorithms for Detection Multiple Linked Faults. In Proceedings ED&TC European design and test conference.

  7. Irobi, S., Al-Ars, Z., & Hamdioui, S. (2010) Detecting memory faults in the presence of bit line coupling in SRAM devices. In IEEE International Test Conference.

  8. Powell, T., Kumar, A., Rayhawk, J., & Mukkerjee, N. (2005) Chasing subtle embedded RAM defects for nanometer technology. In IEEE international test conference (pp. 1–9).

  9. Benso, A., Bosio, A., Di Carlo, S., Di Natale, G., & Prinetto, P. (2006) Automatic March Tests Generations for Static linked faults in SRAMs. In IEEE Proceedings of the Design Automation & Test in Europe Conference.

  10. Hamdioui, S., Al-Ars, Z., & de Goor, A. J. V. (2002) Testing Static and Dynamic Faults in Random Access Memories. In Proceedings 20th IEEE VLSI test symposium (VTS).

  11. Venkatesham, M., Sinha, S. K., & Parvathi, M. (2021) Extraction of Undetectable Faults in 6T-SRAM Cell. In IEEE international conference on communication, control and information sciences (ICCISc) (pp.13–17).

  12. Venkatesham, M., Sinha, S. K., & Parvathi, M. (2021) Study on paradigm of variable length SRAM embedded memory testing. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on electronics, communication and aerospace technology (ICECA).

  13. Parvathi, M., Satya Prasad, K., & Vasantha, N. Testing of embedded SRAMs using parasitic extraction method. In 9th International conference on robotic, vision, signal processing and power applications (Vol. 398).

  14. Venkatesham, M., Sinha, S. K., Parvathi, M. (2022). Fault detection and analysis in embedded SRAM for sub nanometer technology. In International conference on applied artificial intelligence and computing (ICAAIC).

  15. James, C., Li, M., Tseng, C. W., & McCluskey, E. J. (2001) Testing for resistive opens and stuck opens. In IEEE ITC international test conference.

  16. Montanes, R. R., & de Gyvez, J. P. (2002). Resistance Characterization for Weak Open Defects. IEEE Design and Test of Computers, 19, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Borri, S., Hassan, M. H., Girard, P., Pravossoudovitch, S., & Virazel, A. (2003) Defect-oriented dynamic fault models for embedded-SRAMs. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE European test workshop.

  18. Dilillo, L., Girard, P., Pravossoudovitch, S., & Virazel, A. Comparison of open and resistive-open defect test conditions in SRAM address decoders. In IEEE Proceedings of the 12th Asian test symposium.

  19. Dilillo, L., Girard, P., Pravossoudovitch, S., & Virazel, A. (2006). Resistive-open defects in embedded-SRAM core cells: Analysis and march test solution. In 13th Asian Test Symposium.

  20. Martins, M. T., Medeiros, G., Copetti, T., Vargas, F., & Poehls, L. B. (2016). Analyzing NBTI impact on SRAMs with resistive- open defects. In 17th IEEE Latin-American Test Symposium—LATS.

  21. Venkatesham, M., Sinha, S. K., & Parvathi, M. (2021) Analysis of open defect faults in single 6T SRAM cell using R and C parasitic extraction method. In IEEE International Conference on Disruptive Technologies for Multi-Disciplinary Research and Applications (CENTCON-2021) (pp. 213–217).

Download references

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VM simulated all the results, SKS analyzed the theory behind the simulation result, MP formatted the results and conclusion, and Vinay Sharma plotted and analyzed the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeet Kumar Sinha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of Interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maddela, V., Sinha, S.K., Parvathi, M. et al. Comparative Analysis of Open and Short Defects in Embedded SRAM Using Parasitic Extraction Method for Deep Submicron Technology. Wireless Pers Commun 132, 2123–2141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10704-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10704-w

Keywords

Navigation