Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A New Energy-Aware Method for Balancing the Load on Wireless IoT Devices Using an Optimization Algorithm Based on Chaos Theory

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of connected devices contributing to the Internet of Things (IoT) has grown exponentially due to recent developments in wireless technology. The advent of IoT adds an entirely new category of applications to current services. Since the services are regulated by contact among objects, advantages are now being enhanced by utilizing these services. Many sensors and things are installed to track one or more activities. Hence, the load balancing protocol is essential in wireless IoT device architecture. To meet the QoS needs of IoT applications, it is crucial to measure, balance, analyze, and optimize these devices. Moreover, the IoT's vast amount of data and its processing can result in network outages. Studies on load balancing have primarily been conducted on cloud-based systems, and this challenge is an NP-hard problem. Consequently, this paper suggests a new energy-aware method for balancing the load on wireless IoT devices using a biogeography-inspired algorithm named Biogeography-Based Optimization (BBO) based on chaos theory. The BBO algorithm can become trapped in local optima. Chaos theory is one of the most effective techniques for improving the performance of evolutionary algorithms in terms of both the avoidance of local optimums and the rate of convergence. Therefore, the combination of these algorithms is suggested in this paper to improve the efficiency of the balancing method. The effectiveness of the method is simulated using MATLAB. Related current methods are compared to the proposed method, and the findings showed substantial improvements in delay time and load balancing using the proposed technique. The proposed method has decreased the delay time and energy consumption by 7.58% and 15% compared to other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

All data are reported in the paper.

References

  1. Gardas, B. B., et al. (2022). A fuzzy-based method for objects selection in blockchain-enabled edge-IoT platforms using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vahdat, S. (2021). The role of IT-based technologies on the management of human resources in the COVID-19 era. Kybernetes, 17, 265.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, X., et al. (2020). Cooperative wireless-powered NOMA relaying for B5G IoT networks with hardware impairments and channel estimation errors. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(7), 5453–5467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The internet of things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karahoca, A., Karahoca, D., & Aksöz, M. (2018). Examining intention to adopt to internet of things in healthcare technology products. Kybernetes, 47, 742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baccelli, E., et al. (2018). RIOT: An open source operating system for low-end embedded devices in the IoT. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(6), 4428–4440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma, G., & Kalra, S. (2019). A lightweight user authentication scheme for cloud-IoT based healthcare services. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 43(1), 619–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Janabi, T.A., Al-Raweshidy, H.S. (2017). Optimised clustering algorithm-based centralised architecture for load balancing in IoT network. in 2017 International symposium on wireless communication systems (ISWCS). IEEE.

  9. Gong, J., & Navimipour, N. J. (2022). An in-depth and systematic literature review on the blockchain-based approaches for cloud computing. Cluster Computing, 25(1), 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heidari, A., & Navimipour, N. J. (2021). Service discovery mechanisms in cloud computing: a comprehensive and systematic literature review. Kybernetes, 51, 952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghiasi, M., et al. (2022). Evolution of smart grids towards the Internet of energy: Concept and essential components for deep decarbonisation. IET Smart Grid. https://doi.org/10.1049/stg2.12095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Y., et al (2017). Wireless mesh networks in IoT networks. in 2017 International workshop on electromagnetics: applications and student innovation competition. IEEE.

  13. Adhikari, M., & Amgoth, T. (2018). Heuristic-based load-balancing algorithm for IaaS cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 81, 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rui, X., et al. (2020). Load balancing in the internet of things using fuzzy logic and shark smell optimization algorithm. Circuit World, 47(4), 335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghomi, E. J., Rahmani, A. M., & Qader, N. N. (2017). Load-balancing algorithms in cloud computing: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 88, 50–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, T.T., et al (2018). Research on image encryption based on dna sequence and chaos theory. in Journal of physics: conference series. . IOP Publishing.

  17. Anter, A. M., & Ali, M. (2020). Feature selection strategy based on hybrid crow search optimization algorithm integrated with chaos theory and fuzzy c-means algorithm for medical diagnosis problems. Soft Computing, 24(3), 1565–1584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sangaiah, A. K., et al. (2019). A novel quality-of-service-aware web services composition using biogeography-based optimization algorithm. Soft Computing, 24, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kadhim, A. S., & Manaa, M. E. (2022). Hybrid load-balancing algorithm for distributed fog computing in internet of things environment. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 11(6), 3462–3470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdulhammed, O. Y. (2022). Load balancing of IoT tasks in the cloud computing by using sparrow search algorithm. The Journal of Supercomputing, 78(3), 3266–3287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayilsamy, J., & Rangasamy, D. P. (2021). Load Balancing in Software-Defined Networks Using Spider Monkey Optimization Algorithm for the Internet of Things. Wireless Personal Communications, 116(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rui, X., et al. (2020). Load balancing in the internet of things using fuzzy logic and shark smell optimization algorithm. Circuit World, 47, 335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, R., et al (2019). Load balancing for interdependent IoT microservices. in IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE conference on computer communications. IEEE.

  24. Gohil, B.N. and D.R. Patel (2018). A hybrid GWO-PSO algorithm for load balancing in cloud computing environment. in Proceedings of the second international conference on green computing and internet of things (ICGCIoT), Bangalore, India.

  25. Shi, C., et al (2018). Ultra-low latency cloud-fog computing for industrial internet of things. in 2018 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC). IEEE.

  26. LD, D. B., & Krishna, P. V. (2013). Honey bee behavior inspired load balancing of tasks in cloud computing environments. Applied soft computing, 13(5), 2292–2303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cai, Z., Bourgeois, A., & Tong, W. (2017). Guest editorial: Special issue on Internet of Things. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 22(4), 343–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kishor, A., C. Chakraborty, and W. Jeberson (2021). A novel fog computing approach for minimization of latency in healthcare using machine learning.

  29. Sabireen, H., & Neelanarayanan, V. (2021). A review on fog computing: Architecture, fog with IoT, algorithms and research challenges. Ict Express, 7(2), 162–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun, X., & Ansari, N. (2016). EdgeIoT: Mobile edge computing for the Internet of Things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(12), 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fan, Q., & Ansari, N. (2018). Towards workload balancing in fog computing empowered IoT. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 7(1), 253–262.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Laili, Y., et al. (2013). A ranking chaos algorithm for dual scheduling of cloud service and computing resource in private cloud. Computers in Industry, 64(4), 448–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Doungmo Goufo, E. F. (2019). Strange attractor existence for non-local operators applied to four-dimensional chaotic systems with two equilibrium points. Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 29(2), 023117.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Jiménez, M., et al. (2018). A portable embedded system for point-to-point secure signals transmission. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 61, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Asadollahi, M., Ghiasi, A. R., & Badamchizadeh, M. A. (2020). Adaptive synchronization of chaotic systems with hysteresis quantizer input. ISA transactions, 98, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Noori, B., P. Salehpoor, and H.S. Aghdasi (2022). RGB image encryption and decryption with neural Chaotic functions. in 2022 27th International computer conference, computer society of Iran (CSICC). IEEE.

  37. Zhang, M., et al. (2020). Image compression and encryption scheme based on compressive sensing and Fourier transform. IEEE Access, 8, 40838–40849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Procopiou, A., Komninos, N., & Douligeris, C. (2019). ForChaos: Real time application DDoS detection using forecasting and chaos theory in smart home IoT network. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8469410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shaukat, S., et al. (2020). Chaos theory and its application: An essential framework for image encryption. Chaos Theory and Applications, 2(1), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Takens, F. (1981). Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Dynamical systems and turbulence, Warwick 1980 (pp. 366–381). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Simon, D. (2008). Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 12(6), 702–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ma, H., & Simon, D. (2011). Blended biogeography-based optimization for constrained optimization. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24(3), 517–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ghasemi, A., Toroghi Haghighat, A., & Keshavarzi, A. (2022). Enhanced multi-objective virtual machine replacement in cloud data centers: combinations of fuzzy logic with reinforcement learning and biogeography-based optimization algorithms. Cluster Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03794-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, X., et al. (2018). A novel hybrid algorithm based on biogeography-based optimization and grey wolf optimizer. Applied Soft Computing, 67, 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang, X., & Xu, Z. (2014). Multi-objective optimization algorithm based on biogeography with chaos. Int. J. Hybrid. Inf. Technol, 7, 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jovic, S., et al. (2018). Evolutionary algorithm for reference evapotranspiration analysis. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 150, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Saber, W., et al. (2021). Hybrid load balance based on genetic algorithm in cloud environment. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 11(3), 2477–2489.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Taghizadeh, S., Bobarshad, H., & Elbiaze, H. (2018). CLRPL: Context-aware and load balancing RPL for IoT networks under heavy and highly dynamic load. IEEE Access, 6, 23277–23291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Li, G., et al (2017). A new weighted connection-least load balancing algorithm based on delay optimization strategy. in International Conference on Geo-Spatial Knowledge and Intelligence Springer.

  50. Ezhilarasi, M., & Krishnaveni, V. (2019). An evolutionary multipath energy-efficient routing protocol (EMEER) for network lifetime enhancement in wireless sensor networks. Soft Computing, 23(18), 8367–8377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electronic and Information, Sichuan Modern Vocational College, Chengdu, 610207, Sichuan Province, China

    Liu Siyi

Authors
  1. Liu Siyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Siyi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siyi, L. A New Energy-Aware Method for Balancing the Load on Wireless IoT Devices Using an Optimization Algorithm Based on Chaos Theory. Wireless Pers Commun 130, 1677–1697 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10350-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10350-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation