Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Hypergeometrically Represented Responsive and Reliable Cloud Service Model for Personal and Private Clouds

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Last two decades have witnessed a tremendous evolution and growth of cloud computing paradigm and reliability estimation techniques. In spite of recent advancements in this field, very little work has been reported over population bounded personal and private clouds. In this work, a highly responsive and reliable queuing model for finite population clouds has been proposed. The model has an explicit feature of varying length of the waiting queue in accordance with the incoming requests and suggesting the number of virtual machines needed per physical machine. This model has been represented in a generalized hypergeometeric representation which is a simple way to represent queuing based cloud service model. The performance parameters like server utilization, response time and request stage reliability of the proposed model were thoroughly analyzed and compared with the popular existing cloud queuing model and improvement in server utilisation has been observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mell, P., & Grance, T. et al. (2011). The NIST definition of cloud computing

  2. Costello, K., & Hippold, S. (2019). Gartner forecasts worldwide public cloud revenue to grow 17.5 percent in 2019. Connecticut: Stamford. Dostupno na: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-04-02-gartner-forecastsworldwide-public-cloud-revenue-to-g [10. rujna 2019

  3. Karpovich, B., Kesterson-Townes, L., & Rishi, S. (2017). Beyond agility-How cloud is driving enterprise innovation. New York, USA: IBM Institute for Business Value.

  4. Liu, G., Xiao, Z., Tan, G. H., Li, K., & Chronopoulos, A. T. (2020). Game theory-based optimization of distributed idle computing resources in cloud environments. Theoretical Computer Science, 806, 468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.08.019

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher, C., et al. (2018). Cloud versus on-premise computing. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 8(09), 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santhi, K., & Saravanan, R. (2017). Performance analysis of cloud computing using batch queueing models in healthcare systems. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 10(10), 3331. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00591.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kameda, H. (1982). A Finite-source queue with different customers. Journal of ACM, 29(2), 478. https://doi.org/10.1145/322307.322320.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiang, Y. J., Ouyang, Y. C., & Hsu, C. H. R. (2016). Performance and cost-effectiveness analyses for cloud services based on rejected and impatient users. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 9(3), 446. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2014.2365783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Louchard, G. (1994). Large finite population queueing systems. The single-server model. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 53(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4149(94)90060-4.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. El Kafhali, S., & Salah, K. (2017). Stochastic modelling and analysis of cloud computing data center. In 2017 20th Conference on Innovations in Clouds, Internet and Networks (ICIN) (IEEE, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIN.2017.7899401

  11. Chen, H.P., & Li, S.C. (2010). A queueing-based model for performance management on cloud. Proc. - 6th Intl. Conference on Advanced Information Management and Service, IMS2010, with ICMIA2010 - 2nd International Conference on Data Mining and Intelligent Information Technology Applications pp. 83–88

  12. Kalyanaraman, R., & Nagarajan, P. (2019). Bulk arrival, fixed batch service queue with unreliable server, Bernoulli vacation and with delay time. In AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2177, p. 020034. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5135209

  13. Sahoo, C. N., & Goswami, V. (2016). Performance evaluation of cloud centers with high degree of virtualization to provide mapreduce as service. International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing and its Applications, 8(3), 193.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Andrews, G.E., & Garvan, F. (2018). Analytic Number Theory, Modular Forms and Q-Hypergeometric Series: In Honor of Krishna Alladi’s 60th Birthday, University of Florida, Gainesville, March 2016, vol. 221 (Springer)

  15. Bringmann, K., Lovejoy, J., & Rolen, L. (2018). On Some Special Families of q-hypergeometric Maass Forms. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2018(18), 5537. https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnx057

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrews, G. E. (1974). Applications of basic hypergeometric functions. SIAM review, 16(4), 441.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Pradhan, S., Damodaran, P., & Srihari, K. (2008). Predicting performance measures for Markovian type of manufacturing systems with product failures. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(2), 725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.016. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221706011520

  18. Dai, Y. S., Yang, B., Dongarra, J., & Zhang, G. (2009). in 15th IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (Citeseer, 2009). Cloud service reliability: Modeling and analysis. (pp. 1–17)

  19. Kaur, G., & Kumar, R. (2015). A review on reliability issues in cloud service. International Journal of Computer Applications, 975, 8887.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gill, S. S., & Buyya, R. (2020). Failure management for reliable cloud computing: A taxonomy, model, and future directions. Computing in Science & Engineering, 22(3), 52. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2018.2873866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zio, E., & Podofillini, L. (2003). Monte Carlo simulation analysis of the effects of different system performance levels on the importance of multi-state components. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 82(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00124-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bahwaireth, K., Tawalbeh, L., Benkhelifa, E., Jararweh, Y., & Tawalbeh, M. A. (2016). Experimental comparison of simulation tools for efficient cloud and mobile cloud computing applications. EURASIP Journal on Information Security, 2016(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13635-016-0039-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fakhfakh, F., Kacem, H. H., & Kacem, A. H. (2017). Simulation tools for cloud computing: A survey and comparative study. In 2017 IEEE/ACIS 16th International conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS) (IEEE, 2017) (pp. 221–226). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIS.2017.7959997

  24. Snyder, B., Green, R. C., Devabhaktuni, V., & Alam, M. (2018). ReliaCloud-NS: A scalable web-based simulation platform for evaluating the reliability of cloud computing systems. Software: Practice and Experience, 48(3), 665. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garg, S.K., & Buyya, R. (2011). NetworkCloudSim: Modelling Parallel Applications in Cloud Simulations. In 2011 Fourth IEEE Int. Conf. Util. Cloud Comput. (IEEE), Vm, pp. 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC.2011.24

  26. Goswami, V., Patra, S. S., & Mund, G. B. (2012). Performance analysis and optimal resource usage in finite population cloud environment. In 2012 2nd IEEE International conference on parallel, distributed and grid computing (IEEE, 2012). pp. 679–684. https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC.2012.6449902

  27. Chiang, Y. J., & Ouyang, Y. C. (2014). Profit optimization in sla-aware cloud services with a finite capacity queuing model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/534510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar, R., Sahoo, G., Yadav, V., & Malik, P. (2017). Minimizing the energy consumption of cloud computing data centers using queueing theory. In Advances in Computational Intelligence (Springer, 201–210.

  29. Ellens, W., Ivkovic, M., Akkerboom, J., Litjens, R., & van den Berg, H. (2012). Performance of Cloud Computing Centers with Multiple Priority Classes. In 2012 IEEE Fifth International conference on cloud computing (IEEE, 2012). pp. 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2012.96

  30. Ahuja, A., Jain, A., & Jain, M. (2019). Finite population multi-server retrial queueing system with an optional service and balking. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 41(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2018.1505023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Andrews, G. E. (1974). Applications of basic hypergeometric functions. SIAM Review, 16(4), 441. https://doi.org/10.1137/1016081

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Beukers, F. (2014). Hypergeometric Functions, How Special Are They? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 61(01), 48. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1065

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Economou, A., & Kapodistria, S. (2010). Synchronized abandonments in a single server unreliable queue. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.07.014.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Ammar, S. I. (2015). Transient analysis of an M/M/1 queue with impatient behavior and multiple vacations. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 260, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.03.066.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. El Kafhali, S., & Salah, K. (2018). Modeling and analysis of performance and energy consumption in cloud data centers. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 43(12), 7789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3196-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xianrong Zheng, P., & Martin, K. Brohman. (2014). Li Da Xu, CLOUDQUAL: A Quality Model for Cloud Services. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), 1527. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2306329. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6740846/.

  37. Badian-Pessot, P., Lewis, M. E., & Down, D. G. (2019). Optimal control policies for an M/M/1 queue with a removable server and dynamic service rates. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964819000299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Toka, L., Haja, D., Korosi, A., & Sonkoly, B. (2019). Resource provisioning for highly reliable and ultra-responsive edge applications. In 2019 IEEE 8th International conference on cloud networking (CloudNet) (IEEE, 2019). pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudNet47604.2019.9064131

  39. Satyanarayanan, M. (2017). The emergence of edge computing. Computer, 50(1), 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Robertazzi, T. G. (2012). Computer networks and systems: queueing theory and performance evaluation. Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Borovkov, A. (2012). Stochastic processes in queueing theory (Vol. 4). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Medhi, J. (2002). Stochastic models in queueing theory. Elsevier.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Little, J. D. C. (1961). A proof for the queuing formula: L = \(\lambda \) W. Operations Research, 9(3), 383. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.9.3.383.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Ghobaei-Arani, M., Jabbehdari, S., & Pourmina, M. A. (2016). An autonomic approach for resource provisioning of cloud services. Cluster Computing, 19(3), 1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-016-0574-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Singh, S., & Chana, I. (2016). A survey on resource scheduling in cloud computing: Issues and challenges. Journal of grid computing, 14(2), 217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-015-9359-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Madhu, J., & Amita, B. (2012). Retrial queue with threshold recovery, geometric arrivals and finite capacity. Journal of Operations Management, 3(1), 1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0491-6_96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology for Handicapped, Kanpur, 208024, India

    Rohit Sharma

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, 208016, India

    Prateek Gupta

  3. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Harcourt Butler Technical University, Kanpur, 208002, India

    Raghuraj Singh

Authors
  1. Rohit Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prateek Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raghuraj Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohit Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, R., Gupta, P. & Singh, R. Hypergeometrically Represented Responsive and Reliable Cloud Service Model for Personal and Private Clouds. Wireless Pers Commun 125, 1501–1521 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09618-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09618-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation