Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Iterative Detection Based on Consensus Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers in Massive Machine-Type Communications

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In massive machine-type communication systems, only some of devices usually transmit signals while the others remain silent. The conventional multiuser detection methods have been used with the aid of compressive sensing techniques, but their performance is far from the optimal one. In this paper, we propose an iterative signal detection method that jointly identifies the non-zero support and detects modulated symbols based on consensus alternating direction method of multipliers. Simulation results show that its performance is much better than the conventional detection methods and close to the lower-bound performance of the ideal detector in the case of high SNR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Series, M. (2015). IMT vision: Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond. In Recommendation ITU-R M.2083-0.

  2. Rong, R., Wang, J., Oh, S.-K., & Hong, S.-N. (2017). Sparse-aware minimum mean square error detector for MIMO systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 21(10), 2214–2217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ran, R., Park, G.-J., Hong, S.-N., Oh, S., & Wang, J. (2018). Generalized sparse-aware minimum mean square error detector for large MU-MIMO systems with higher-order QAM modulation schemes. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on communication (ICC).

  4. Choi, J. W., Shim, B., Ding, Y., Rao, B., & Kim, D. I. (2017). Compressed sensing for wireless communications: Useful tips and tricks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), 1527–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abebe, A. T., & Kang, C. G. (2016). Iterative order recursive least square estimation for exploiting frame-wise sparsity in compressive sensing-based MTC. IEEE Communications Letters, 20(5), 1018–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sparrer, S., & Fischer, R. (2016). MMSE-based version of OMP for recovery of discrete-valued sparse signals. Electronics Letters, 52(1), 75–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu, H., & Giannakis, G. (2011). Exploiting sparse user activity in multiuser detection. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 59(2), 454–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barik, S., & Vikalo, H. (2014). Sparsity-aware sphere decoding: Algorithms and complexity analysis. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62(9), 2212–2225.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, X., Liang, Y., & Fang, J. (2017). Novel Bayesian inference algorithms for multiuser detection in M2M communications. IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, 66(9), 7833–7848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, X., Labeau, F., Liang, Y., & Fang, J. (2018). Compressive sensing based multiuser detection via iterative reweighed approach in M2M communications. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, Early Access, 7(5), 764–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Knoop, B., Monsees, F., Bockelmann, C., Wuebben, D., Paul, S., & Dekorsy, A. (2013). Sparsity-aware successive interference cancellation with practical constraints. In WSA 2013; 17th international ITG workshop on smart antennas, pp. 1–8.

  12. Ahn, J., Shim, B., & Lee, K. (2018). Sparsity-aware ordered successive interference cancellation for massive machine-type communications. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 7(1), 134–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2010). Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations and Trends, 3(1), 1–122.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, J., & Park, D. (2018). Massive MIMO detection based on alternating direction method of multipliers. The Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 43(6), 887–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, S., & Hanzo, L. (2015). Fifty years of MIMO detection: The road to large-scale MIMOs. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(4), 1941–1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Inha University Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daeyoung Park.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M., Lee, J. & Park, D. Iterative Detection Based on Consensus Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers in Massive Machine-Type Communications. Wireless Pers Commun 110, 2253–2264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07082-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07082-y

Keywords

Navigation