Abstract
Wireless network has different architectures based on the structure of the network. In the proposed overlay architecture, the better communication is achieved by combining the different networks. The specific service overlay network is focusing mainly on the delivery path. This existing technique considers the management node to monitor the network for getting the quality of data transmission. Due to the management node, it has high complexity and delay. Another existing technique is overlay information centric network (OICN) which focus on reducing the cost and node deployment. The OICN technique separates the data plane and control plane, based on the control plane information, data plane will be activated. This existing technique produces delay and high packet loss due to fault information from control plane. To overcome all the above issue, a new technique is generated which is called as overlay approach in different architecture (OADA). This proposed OADA technique consists of four different architectures such as distributed, centralized, hybrid and clustered architecture. Peer to peer distributed architecture act as server nodes and the remaining architectures act as client nodes. Centralized architecture reduces the security issues, hybrid architecture increases the scalability and reliability and clustered architecture improves the network performance. Experimental results analyze the different architectures using the QoS parameters for QoE.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdeljaouad, I., & Karmouch, A. (2015). Monitoring IPTV quality of experience in overlay networks using utility functions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 54, 1–10.
Al Ridhawi, Y., & Karmouch, A. (2015). QoS-based composition of service specific overlay networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 64(3), 832–846.
Bradai, A., Singh, K., Ahmed, T., & Rasheed, T. (2015). Cellular software defined networking: A framework. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(6), 36–43.
Becot, S., Bertin, E., Crom, J.-M., Frey, V., & Tuffin, S. (2015). Communication services in the Web era: How can Telco join the OTT hangout?. In 2015 18th international conference on intelligence in next generation networks (ICIN) (pp. 208–215). IEEE, 2015.
Chen, H.-H. (2015). Maintaining a zero open call backlog [Message From The Editor-In-Chief]. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(1), 2–4.
Chang, R.-I., Wei, T.-T., & Wang, C.-H. (2015). A cost-effective key distribution of P2P IPTV DRM over opportunistic multicast overlay for e-commerce systems. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1), 49–71.
De Felice, M., Cerqueira, E., Melo, A., Gerla, M., Cuomo, F., & Baiocchi, A. (2015). A distributed beaconless routing protocol for real-time video dissemination in multimedia VANETs. Computer Communications, 58, 40–52.
Fotiou, N., Katsaros, K. V., Xylomenos, G., & Polyzos, G. C. (2015). H-pastry: An inter-domain topology aware overlay for the support of name-resolution services in the future internet. Computer Communications, 62, 13–22.
Granda, J. C., Nuño, P., García, D. F., & Suárez, F. J. (2015). Autonomic platform for synchronous e-training in dispersed organizations. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 23(1), 183–209.
Goleva, R., Stainov, R., Savov, A., & Draganov, P. (2015). Reliable platform for enhanced living environment. In Mobile networks and management (pp. 315–328). Springer International Publishing, 2015.
Girão-Silva, R., Craveirinha, J., Clímaco, J., & Captivo, M. E. (2015). Multiobjective routing in multiservice MPLS networks with traffic splitting—A network flow approach. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 1–44. doi:10.1007/s11518-015-5262-4.
Krishnan, R. R, & Figueira, N. (2015). Analysis of data center SDN controller architectures: Technology and business impacts. In 2015 International conference on computing, networking and communications (ICNC) (pp. 104–109). IEEE, 2015.
Maia, O. B., Yehia, H. C., & de Errico, L. (2015). A concise review of the quality of experience assessment for video streaming. Computer Communications, 57, 1–12.
Nguyen, V. A., Lu, J., Zhao, S., Vu, D. T., Yang, H., Jones, D. L., et al. (2015). ITEM: Immersive telepresence for entertainment and meetings—A practical approach. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 9(3), 546–561.
Seeling, P. (2015). Towards quality of experience determination for video in augmented binocular vision scenarios. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 33, 41–50.
Shailendra, S., Panigrahi, B., Rath, H. K. & Simha, A. (2015). A novel overlay architecture for information centric networking. In 2015 Twenty First National Conference on Communications (NCC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE, 2015.
Sakkopoulos, E., Paschou, M., Panagis, Y., Kanellopoulos, D., Eftaxias, G., & Tsakalidis, A. (2015). e-souvenir appification: QoS web based media delivery for museum apps. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1), 5–24.
Tommasi, F., De Luca, V., & Melle, C. (2015). Packet losses and objective video quality metrics in H. 264 video streaming. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 27, 7–27.
Wajda, K., Stankiewicz, R., Duliński, Z., Hoßfeld, T., Seufert, M., Hausheer, D., et al. (2015). Socially-aware management of new overlay applications traffic—The optimization potentials of the SmartenIT Approach. In Mobile networks and management (pp. 290–300). Springer International Publishing, 2015.
Yetgin, Z., & Göçer, Z. (2015). Quality of experience prediction model for progressive downloading over mobile broadcast networks. Telecommunication Systems, 58(1), 55–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poongodi, P., Kumareshan, N. Analysis of Dynamic Overlay Architecture for the Quality of Experience (QoE) Improvement in Wireless Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 90, 503–514 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3080-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3080-0