Robust Factorization Methods Using a Gaussian/Uniform Mixture Model

• Aanaes, H., Fisker, R., & Astrom, K. (2002). Robust factorization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(9), 1215–1225.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anandan, P., & Irani, M. (2002). Factorization with uncertainty. International Journal of Computer Vision, 49(2/3), 101–116.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Berlin: Springer.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Bouguet, J.-Y. (2001). Pyramidal implementation of the affine lucas kanade feature tracker—description of the algorithm (Technical report). Intel Corporation.

• Brant, S. (2002). Closed-form solutions for affine reconstruction under missing data. In Proceedings of statistical methods for video processing (ECCV ’02 Workshop) (pp. 109–114).

• Christy, S., & Horaud, R. (1996). Euclidean shape and motion from multiple perspective views by affine iterations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(11), 1098–1104.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.

  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Faugeras, O. (1993). Three dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981). Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6), 381–395.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2002). Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 611–631.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Golub, G. H., & Van Loan, C. F. (1989). Matrix computations. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Gruber, A., & Weiss, Y. (2003). Factorization with uncertainty and missing data: exploring temporal coherence. In Proceedings neural information processing systems (NIPS’2003).

• Gruber, A., & Weiss, Y. (2004). Multibody factorization with uncertainty and missing data using the em algorithm. In Proceedings conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 707–714).

• Hajder, L., & Chetverikov, D. (2004). Robust structure from motion under weak perspective. In Proc. of the second international symposium on 3d data processing, visualization, and transmission, September 2004.

• Hartley, R., & Schaffalitzky, F. (2003). Powerfactorization: 3d reconstruction with missing or uncertain data (Technical report). Australian National University.

• Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2000). Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Horn, B. K. P. (1987). Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. Journal of Optical Society of America A, 4(4), 629–642.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Huynh, D. Q., Hartley, R., & Heyden, A. (2003). Outlier correction in image sequences for the affine camera. In Proceedings ICCV (Vol. 1, pp. 585–590).

• Huynh, D. Q., & Heyden, A. (2002). Robust factorization for the affine camera: Analysis and comparison. In Proc. seventh international conference on control, automation, robotics, and vision, Singapore, December 2002.

• Kanatani, K. (1998). Geometric information criterion for model selection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 26(3), 171–189.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kanatani, K. (2004). Uncertainty modeling and model selection for geometric inference. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(10), 1307–1319.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Luong, Q., & Faugeras, O. (1997). Self-calibration of a moving camera from point correspondences and fundamental matrices. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 5–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Luong, Q.-T., & Faugeras, O. D. (2001). The geometry of multiple images. Boston: MIT Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Mahamud, S., & Hebert, M. (2000). Iterative projective reconstruction from multiple views. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR ’00) (Vol. 2, pp. 430–437). June 2000.

• Mahamud, S., Hebert, M., Omori, Y., & Ponce, J. (2001). Provably-convergent iterative methods for projective structure from motion. In IEEE conf. on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR).

• McLachlan, G. J., & Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: Wiley.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Meer, P. (2004). Robust techniques for computer vision. In Emerging topics in computer vision. Prentice Hall.

• Miller, D. J., & Browning, J. (2003). A mixture model and em-based algorithm for class discovery, robust classification and outlier rejection in mixed labeled/unlabeled data sets. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(11), 1468–1483.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miyagawa, I., & Arakawa, K. (2006). Motion and shape recovery based on iterative stabilization for modest deviation from planar motion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(7), 1176–1181.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Morris, D., & Kanade, T. (1998). A unified factorization algorithm for points, line segments and planes with uncertainty models. In Proceedings of international conference of computer vision (pp. 696–702).

• Oliensis, J., & Hartley, R. (2007). Iterative extensions of the sturm/triggs algorithm: Convergence and nonconvergence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(12), 2217–2233.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rousseeuw, P. J. (1984). Least median of squares regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 871–880.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Rousseeuw, P. J., & Van Aelst, S. (1999). Positive-breakdown robust methods in computer vision. In Berk, & Pourahmadi (Eds.), Computing science and statistics (Vol. 31, pp. 451–460). Interface Foundation of North America.

• Roweis, S. (1997). EM algorithm for PCA and SPCA. Proceedings NIPS, 10, 626–632.

  Google Scholar 

• Shum, H., Ikeuchi, K., & Reddy, R. (1995). Principal component analysis with missing data and its application to polyhedral object modeling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(9), 855–867.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stewart, C. V. (1999). Robust parameter estimation in computer vision. SIAM Review, 41(3), 513–537.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Sturm, P., & Triggs, W. (1996). A factorization based algorithm for multi-image projective structure and motion. In LNCS : Vol. 1065. Proceedings of the 4th European conference on computer vision (pp. 709–720). Cambridge, England. Berlin: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Tardif, J.P., Bartoli, A., Trudeau, M., Guilbert, N., & Roy, S. (2007). Algorithms for batch matrix factorization with application to structure-from-motion. In Proc. of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Minneapolis, USA, June 2007.

• Tomasi, C., & Kanade, T. (1992). Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: a factorization method. International Journal of Computer Vision, 9(2), 137–154.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Trajkovic, M., & Hedley, M. (2007). Robust recursive structure and motion recovery under affine projection. In Proc. of the British machine vision conference, September 1997.

• Triggs, W., McLauchlan, P., Hartley, R., & Fitzgibbon, A. (2000). Bundle adjustment—a modern synthesis. In LNCS. Vision algorithms: theory and practice (pp. 298–375).

• Vidal, R., & Hartley, R. (2004). Motion segmentation with missing data using powerfactorization and GPCA. In Proceedings CVPR (Vol. 2, pp. 310–316).

• Walker, M. W., Shao, L., & Volz, R. A. (1991). Estimating 3-d location parameters using dual number quaternions. CGVIP-Image Understanding, 54(3), 358–367.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Wiberg, T. (1976). Computation of principal components when data are missing. In Proceedings symposium of computational statistics (pp. 229–326).

• Zaharescu, A., Horaud, R., Ronfard, R., & Lefort, L. (2006). Multiple camera calibration using robust perspective factorization. In Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on 3d data processing, visualization and transmission, Chapel Hill, USA. IEEE Computer Society Press.

• Zaharescu, A., Boyer, E., & Horaud, R. P. (2007). Transformesh: a topology-adaptive mesh-based approach to surface evolution. In Proceedings of the eighth Asian conference on computer vision, LNCS, Tokyo, Japan, November 2007. Springer.

• Zhang, Z. (2000). A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(11), 1330–1334.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, Z. (2004). Camera calibration with one-dimensional objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(7), 892–899.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references