Abstract
Most philosophers who have endorsed the idea that there is such a thing as phenomenal content—content that supervenes on phenomenal character—have also endorsed what I call Standard Russellianism. According to Standard Russellianism, phenomenal content is Russellian in nature, and the properties represented by perceptual experiences are mind-independent physical properties. In agreement with Sydney Shoemaker [Shoemaker, S. (1994). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54 249–314], I argue that Standard Russellianism is incompatible with the possibility of spectrum inversion without illusion. One defense of Standard Russellianism is to hold that spectrum inversion without illusion is conceivable but not in fact possible. I argue that this response fails. As a consequence, either phenomenal content is not Russellian, or experiences do not represent mind-independent physical properties.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Block N. (1996). Mental paint and mental latex. In: Villanueva E. (Ed), Philosophical issues, 7. Atascadero, Ridgeview
Bonjour L. (1998). In defense of pure reason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Byrne A., Hilbert D. (1997). Colors and reflectances. In: Byrne A., Hilbert D. (Eds), Readings on color (Vol 1). Cambridge, MIT Press
Byrne A., Hilbert D. (Eds). (1997). Readings on color (Vol 2). Cambridge, MIT Press
Chalmers D. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Chalmers D. (1999). Materialism and the metaphysics of modality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59, 473–493
Chalmers D. (2003). The content and epistemology of phenomenal belief. In: Smith Q., Jokic A. (Eds), Consciousness: New philosophical perspectives. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Crane H., Piantandia T. (1983). On seeing reddish green and yellowish blue. Science, 221, 1078–1079
Harman G. (1990). The intrinsic quality of experience. Philosophical Perspectives, 4, 31–52
Harman G. (2001). Rational insight versus general foundations. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63, 657–663
Jackson, F.,& Pargetter, R. (1987). An objectivist’s guide to subjectivism about colour. Revue Internationale de Philosophie , 41, 127–141. (Reprinted in A. Byrne & D. Hilbert (Eds.),Readings on color(Vol. 1). Cambridge: MIT Press).
Loar B. (1990). Phenomenal states. Philosophical Perspectives, 4, 81–108
Loar B. (1997). Phenomenal states (second version). In: Block N. et al. (Eds), The nature of consciousness. MIT Press.
Moore G.E. (1903). The refutation of idealism. Mind, 12, 433–453
Nassau K. (1983). The physics and chemistry of color: The fifteen causes of color. New York, Wiley
Nida-Rumelin M. (1995). What Mary couldn’t know: Belief about phenomenal states. In T. Metzinger (Ed.), Conscious experience. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
Shoemaker S. (1994). Self-knowledge and “inner-sense”. Philosophy and Phenomenological , 54, 249–314
Shoemaker S. (2001). Introspection and phenomenal character. Philosophical Topics, 28(2): 247–273
Thompson, B. (2003). The Nature of Phenomenal Content. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Arizona.
Thompson, B. (forthcoming). Shoemaker on phenomenal content. Philosophical Studies.
Thompson, B. (manuscript). Senses for senses.
Tye M. (1992). Visual qualia and visual content. In: Crane T., (Ed), The contents of experience. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Tye M. (1999). Phenomenal consciousness: The explanatory gap as a cognitive illusion. Mind, 108 Reprinted in Tye 2000
Tye M. (2000). Consciousness, color, and content. Cambridge, MIT Press
Yablo S. (1993). Is conceivability a guide to possibility?. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 1–42
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, B. Representationalism and the conceivability of inverted spectra. Synthese 160, 203–213 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9110-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9110-4