Abstract
The development of the Internet of Things (IoT) accentuates the interweaving of the digital with the physical, raising multiple issues, including for learning and more specifically for the learning of the deaf. While emerging technologies may have given rise to various methods and modes of learning, the implications of the IoT for deaf learning are not yet understood. This study aims to propose the possible integration of the IoT and augmented reality (AR) to support deaf learning from three dimensions of analysis: data, interfaces and pervasiveness. The axes of applications identified suggest that the IoT promotes learning characterized by experimentation, adaptation (to the context and to the learner), the manipulation of objects and exploration without the constraints of time or space. In order to achieve this integration, preliminary survey is collected from deaf learners. Based on the results, a deaf intelligent learning model is proposed and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Mohd Hashim MH, Tasir Z (2020) An e-learning environment embedded with sign language videos: research into its usability and the academic performance and learning patterns of deaf students. Educ Tech Res Dev 68:2873–2911
McKeown C, McKeown J (2019) Accessibility in online courses: understanding the deaf learner. TechTrends 63:506–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00385-3
Tanganelli G, Curado M (2019) Reliability of internet of things: smart objects and services. J Reliable Intell Environ 5:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-019-00078-x
Xiong J, Hsiang EL, He Z et al (2021) Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: emerging technologies and future perspectives. Light Sci Appl 10:216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00658-8
Scavarelli A, Arya A, Teather RJ (2021) Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual Reality 25:257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8
Venkatasubramaniam AMRC, Duraisamy K, Subramaniam D, Chelladurai M (2011) Embedding sign representation in mobile phones to assist disabled. Comput Technol Appl 2:42–47
Prinetto P, Shoaib U, Tiotto G The italian sign language sign bank : using wordnet for sign language corpus creation, in communications and information technology (ICCIT). In: International Conference on, 2011, pp. 134–137.
Harry G Lang. Higher education for deaf students: research priorities in the new millennium, national technical university for the deaf, rochester. Oxford university press 2002
Hisyamuddin, zaidatun. E-learning environment for hearing impaired students, tojet. The turkish online journal of educational technology. October 2013
Korucu T and Alkan A Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in IoT 2011
Saleem TA Mobile learning technology: a new step in e-learning, journal of theoretical and applied information technology, vol. 34, 31st December 2011
Nasr MM An enhanced e-learning environement for deaf/hoh pupils, in computer technology and development (icctd), In: 2nd International Conference on, 2010, pp.724
Paudyal P, Banerjee A, Hu Y, and Gupta S (2019) Davee: A deaf accessi ble virtual environment for education, In: Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition, pp.522–526, ACM
Te´ofilo M, Lourenc A ¸ o,J Postal, and Lucena VF (2018) Exploring virtual reality to enable deaf or hard of hearing accessibility in live theaters: Acasestudy. In: International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, pp.132–148, Springer
Lee M, Je S, Lee W, Ashbrook D, Bianchi A (2019) Activearring: spatiotemporal haptic cues on the ears. IEEE Trans Haptics 12:554–562
DY Huang, T Seyed, LLi, J Gong, Z Yao, Y Jiao, XA Che, and XD Yang Orecchio: Extending body language through actuated static and dynamic auricular postures,” In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST’18, (NewYork,NY,USA) ,pp.697–710, ACM,2018
Kojima Y, Hashimoto Y, Fukushima S, and Kajimoto H (2009) Pull-navi: A novel tactile navigation interface by pulling the ears. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Emerging Technologies, SIGGRAPH’09, (NewYork,NY,USA), pp.19:1–19:1, ACM
Wolf F, Kuber R (2018) Developing a head-mounted tactile prototype to support situational awareness. Int J Hum Comput Stud 109:54–67
de Jesus Oliveira VA, Brayda L, Nedel L, and Maciel A (2017) Designing a vibrotactile head-mounted display for spatial awareness in 3d spaces. In: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol.23, pp.1409–1417
Jain D, Findlater L, Gilkeson J, Holland B, Duraiswami R, Zotkin D, Vogler C, and Froehlich JE (2015) Head-mounted display visualizations to support sound awareness for the deaf and hard of hearing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’15, (NewYork, NY, USA), pp. 241–250, ACM
Findlater L, Chinh B, Jain D, Froehlich J, Kushalnagar R, and Lin AC (2019) Deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals preferences for wearable and mobile sound awareness technologies. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’19, (NewYork, NY, USA), pp. 46:1–46:13, ACM
Sicong L, Zimu Z, Junzhao D, Longfei S, Han J, and Wang X (2017) Ubiear: Bringing location-independent sound awareness to the hard-of hearing people with smartphones. In: Proceedings ACM Interactactive Mobile. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol, vol.1, pp.17:1–17:21
Shibasaki M, Kamiyama Y, and Minamizawa k (2016) Designing ahaptic feedback system for hearing-impaired to experience tap dance. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp.97–99, ACM
Petry B, Illandara T, and Nanayakkara S (2016) Muss-bits: sensor-display blocks for deaf people to explore musical sounds. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 72–80, ACM
Guzman D, Brito G, Naranjo JE, Garcia CA, Saltos LF, and Garcia MV (2018) Virtual assistance environment for deaf people based on an electronic gauntlet. In: 2018 IEEE Third Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM), pp.1–6, IEEE
Hashizume S, Sakamoto S, Suzuki K, and Ochiai Y (2018) Livejacket: Wearable music experience device with multiple speakers. In: International Conference on Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions, pp.359–371, Springer
Ma, C, Kulshrestha, S, Shi, W, Okada, Y, Bose, R (2018). E-learning Material Development Framework Supporting VR/AR Based on Linked Data for IoT Security Education. In: Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Javaid, N., Spaho, E., Kolici, V. (eds) Advances in Internet, Data & Web Technologies. EIDWT 2018. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75928-9_43
Smart digital education enhanced by AR and IoT data. Shoikova, R. Nikolov, E. Kovatcheva. 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, March 5th–7th, 2018, Valencia, Spain, pp. 5861–5871. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.1392
Bahuguna Y, Verma A and Raj K (2018) Smart learning based on augmented reality with android platform and its applicability. In: 2018 3rd International Conference On Internet of Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU). pp. 1-5, https://doi.org/10.1109/IoT-SIU.2018.8519853
Petrović L, Stojanović D, Mitrović S, Barac D, Bogdanović Z (2022) Designing an extended smart classroom: an approach to game-based learning for IoT. Comput Appl Eng Educ 30:117–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22446
Meda P, Kumar M and Parupalli R (2014) Mobile augmented reality application for Telugu language learning. In: IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 183–186, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2014.7020267.
Paul S, Hamad S, Khalid S (2019) The Role of AR/ VR in an IoT connected digital enterprise for smart education. Sixth HCT Inf Technol Trends (ITT) 2019:305–308. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITT48889.2019.9075102
Liao Y-W, Hsieh M-C, Wei C-W (2021) Effectiveness of integrating ar and iot technologies into environmental education for elementary school students. Int Conf Adv Learn Technol (ICALT) 2021:78–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT52272.2021.00031
Dinayusadewi NP, Agustika GNS (2020) Development of augmented reality application as a mathematics learning media in elementary school geometry materials. J Educ Technol. 4(2):204–210. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i2.25372
Rohendi D, Septian S and Sutarno H The Use of Geometry Learning Media Based on Augmented Reality for Junior High School Students. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 306, 2nd International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Vocational Education, October 25–26th 2017, Manado, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012029
Ismail A and Festiana I and Hartini TI and Yusal Y and Malik A (2019) Enhancing students' conceptual understanding of electricity using learning media-based augmented reality. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, vol 1157, pp. 032049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032049
Elmunsyah H, Hidayat WN, Asfani K (2019) Interactive learning media innovation: utilization of augmented reality and pop-up book to improve user’s learning autonomy. J Phys: Conf Ser 1193:012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1193/1/012031
Hakin A, Gokhale A, Berthou P, Schmidt DC, Gayraud T (2014) Software-defined networking: challenges and research opportunities for future internet. Published Comput Netw. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2014.10.015
Krumm JÉd (2010) Ubiquitous computing fundamentals. Chapman & Hall BOOK/CRC Press, Microsoft Corporation Redmond, Washington, U.S.A, Boca Ragon
Zuckerman O. (2006), « Historical overview and classification of traditional and digital learning objects », MIT Media Laboratory, 20 Ames Street, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Huang YM, Chiu PS, Liu TC, Chen TS (2011) The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning. Comput Educ 57(4):2291–2302
Kannouf N, Benabdellah M, Douzi Y, Azizi A (2015), «Security on RFID technology», International Conference on Cloud Technologies and Applications (CloudTech), 2–4 June 2015, Marrakesh, Morocco, IEEE Xplore Digital Library
BUNBURY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL. (2019), «Bring Your Own Device Information», Haig Cres, Bunbury WA 6230, Australie.
Savoie-Zajc L (2007) Comment peut-on construire un échantillonnage scientifiquement valide ? Recherches qualitatives, Hors série 5:99–111
Sharma R, Palaskar S, Black AW and Metze F End-To-End speech summarization using restricted self-attention. arXiv:2110.06263v2 [cs.CL] 24 Jan 2022
Palaskar S, Salakhutdinov R, Black AW, Metze F (2021) Multimodal speech summarization through semantic concept learning. Proc Interspeech 2021:791–795
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix I
Questionnaire about the use of modern communication and e-learning technologies by deaf persons.
Section (I): General information.
Q1: What is your age?
18–25.
25–30.
30–35.
35–40.
More than 40.
Section (II): Use of modern communication technologies.
Q2: What is your degree of use of the following services?
Low | Medium | High | |
---|---|---|---|
Forums and chat | |||
Social networks | |||
E-mailing | |||
Search engines | |||
E-learning | |||
E-gov services | |||
Banking online | |||
Shopping online | |||
Use of technology in daily tasks |
Q3: What is your degree of use of the following devices?
Low | Medium | High | |
---|---|---|---|
Smartphones | |||
Tablets | |||
Computers | |||
Smart watches | |||
IoT Connected devices |
Q4: For presential courses, what is the best method to communicate with the teacher?
Face to face.
Through e-learning systems (e.g., Blackboard).
Communicate via e-mail.
Communicate through social networking programs (WhatsApp—Twitter—Facebook).
Through intelligent wearable smart IoT devices (smart watches).
Section (III): E-learning experience
Q5: What is the preferred method of communication to know the activities and announcements of the department, college and university?
By directly entering the college or university page.
By following the advertisements of e-learning systems (example: Blackboard).
By following the university's social media (WhatsApp—Twitter—Facebook).
By following up on university emails.
Via direct communication with a sign language interpreter.
Other: …………………………………………………………
Q6: How do you qualify your e-learning experience (if any)
Excellent.
Very Good.
Average.
Acceptable.
Weak.
Q7 In case you attended e-learning courses, you recommend that the course should
Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Be short and clear | |||||
Contain graphs and animations | |||||
Contain videos | |||||
Contain examples | |||||
Contain videos in sign language | |||||
Contain summarization at the end | |||||
Contain evaluation at the end |
Appendix II
Summary of information of participants (see Tables
7,
8,
9,
10).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alrashidi, M. Synergistic integration between internet of things and augmented reality technologies for deaf persons in e-learning platform. J Supercomput 79, 10747–10773 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04952-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04952-z