Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving the classification performance of biological imbalanced datasets by swarm optimization algorithms

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classification which is a popular supervised machine learning method has many applications in computational biology, where data samples are automatically categorized into predefined labels with the aid of data mining. Often the training samples contain very few instances of interest (e.g., medical anomalies, rare disease in a population, and unusual syndromes, etc.), but many normal instances. Such imbalanced ratio of data distributions among the target labels hampers the efficacy of classification algorithms, because the induced model has not been trained with sufficient amount of instances of the interesting label(s), but overwhelmed with ordinary training records. Traditional remedies attempt to rebalance the data distributions of the target classes, by inflating the interesting instances artificially, reducing the majority of the common instances or a combination of both. Though the fundamental concept is effective, there is no clear guideline on how to strike a balance between fabricating the rare samples and reducing the norms, with the purpose of maximizing the classification accuracy. In this paper, an optimization model using different swarm strategies (Bat-inspired algorithm and PSO) is proposed for adaptively balancing the increase/decrease of the class distribution, depending on the properties of the biological datasets. The optimization is extended for achieving the highest possible accuracy and Kappa statistics at the same time as well. The optimization model is tested on five imbalanced medical datasets, which are sourced from lung surgery logs and virtual screening of bioassay data. Computer simulation results show that the proposed optimization model outperforms other class balancing methods in medical data classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehta M, Agrawal R, Rissanen J (1996) SLIQ: a fast scalable classifier for data mining. In: Advances in database technology—EDBT’96. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 18–32

  2. Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2011) Data mining: concepts and techniques: concepts and techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Estabrooks A, Jo T, Japkowicz N (2004) A multiple resampling method for learning from imbalanced data sets. Comput Intell 20(1):18–36

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan W et al (1999) AdaCost: misclassification cost-sensitive boosting. In: ICML

  5. Zadrozny B, Langford J, Abe N (2003) Cost-sensitive learning by cost-proportionate example weighting. In: Third IEEE international conference on data mining, 2003. ICDM 2003. IEEE

  6. Wu G, Chang EY (2005) KBA: Kernel boundary alignment considering imbalanced data distribution. Knowl Data Eng IEEE Trans 17(6):786–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Joshi MV, Kumar V, Agarwal RC (2001) Evaluating boosting algorithms to classify rare classes: Comparison and improvements. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on data mining, 2001. ICDM 2001. IEEE

  8. Kotsiantis SB, Pintelas PE (2003) Mixture of expert agents for handling imbalanced data sets. Ann Math Comput Teleinform 1(1):46–55

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chawla NV et al (2003) SMOTEBoost: improving prediction of the minority class in boosting. In: Knowledge discovery in databases: PKDD 2003. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 107–119

  10. Chawla NV et al (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy J (2010) Particle swarm optimization. Encyclopedia of machine learning. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xin-She Y (2010) A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In: Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NICSO, 2010). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 65–74

  13. Ichikawa T et al (2007) High-b value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 188(2):409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lichman M (2013) UCI Machine learning repository. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml. Accessed 11 Nov 2015

  15. Maciej Z, Tomczak JM, Lubicz M, Witek J (2014) Boosted SVM for extracting rules from imbalanced data in application to prediction of the post-operative life expectancy in the lung cancer patients. In: Applied soft computing, vol 14, Elsevier, pp 99–108

  16. Schierz AC (2009) Virtual screening of bioassay data. J Cheminform 1:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen X, Wang M, Zhang H (2011) The use of classification trees for bioinformatics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 1(1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma XH, Yap CW (2010) Consensus model for identification of novel PI3K inhibitors in large chemical library. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 24(2):131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tong DL, Mintram R (2010) Genetic algorithm-neural network (GANN): a study of neural network activation functions and depth of genetic algorithm search applied to feature selection. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 1(1–4):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for the financial support from the research grant “Temporal Data Stream Mining by Using Incrementally Optimized Very Fast Decision Forest (iOVFDF)”, Grant No. MYRG2015-00128-FST, offered by the University of Macau, FST, and RDAO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Fong.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Table 3 Results of surgery dataset
Table 4 Results of AID 362 in Bioassay
Table 5 Results of AID 439 in Bioassay
Table 6 Results of AID 721 in Bioassay
Table 7 Results of AID 1284 in Bioassay

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Fong, S., Mohammed, S. et al. Improving the classification performance of biological imbalanced datasets by swarm optimization algorithms. J Supercomput 72, 3708–3728 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1541-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1541-6

Keywords

Navigation