Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Heuristics to allocate high-performance cloudlets for computation offloading in mobile ad hoc clouds

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cyber foraging is an important method to enable resource-constrained mobile devices to perform applications in different mobile cloud computing environments to improve performance and to save energy consumption. This paper focuses on the decision problem about how to offload computation-intensive applications in mobile ad hoc network-based cloud computing environments. A set of online and batch scheduling heuristics were proposed to offload dynamically arriving independent tasks among mobile nodes. The heuristics were validated in a simulation environment, and their performances with respect to both user-centric and system-centric metrics such as the average makespan, the average waiting time, the average slowdown and the average utilization, were investigated with comprehensive experiments. Experimental results show that it is not appropriate to map tasks only based on the expected bandwidth, execution time or the overall offloading time, On the contrary, the expected completion time must be taken into account. Furthermore, the MCTComm heuristic seems to be the best choice from the standpoint of the tradeoff between the complexity and the performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abolfazli S, Sanaei Z, Gani A, Xia F, Yang LT (2014) Rich mobile applications: genesis, taxonomy, and open issues. J Netw Comput Appl 40:345–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balan R, Flinn J, Satyanarayanan M, Sinnamohideen S, Yang H-I (2002) The case for cyber foraging. In: Proceedings of the 10th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop. ACM, pp 87–92

  3. Mtibaa A, Snober MA, Carelli A, Beraldi R, Alnuweiri H (2014) Collaborative mobile-to-mobile computation offloading. In: 2014 international conference on collaborative computing: networking, applications and worksharing. IEEE, pp 460–465

  4. Fahim A, Mtibaa A, Harras KA (2013) Making the case for computational offloading in mobile device clouds. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, pp 203–205

  5. Shires D, Henz B, Park S, Clarke J (2012) Cloudlet seeding: spatial deployment for high performance tactical clouds. In: The 2012 international conference on parallel and distributed processing techniques and applications. CSREA Press, pp 1–7

  6. Saeid A, Zohreh S, Abdullah G (2012) Mobile cloud computing: a review on smartphone augmentation approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.0451

  7. Abolfazli S, Sanaei Z, Ahmed E, Gani A, Buyya R (2014) Cloud-based augmentation for mobile devices: motivation, taxonomies, and open challenges. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutorials 16(1):337–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharifi M, Kafaie S, Kashefi O (2012) A survey and taxonomy of cyber foraging of mobile devices. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutorials 14(4):1232–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kristensen MD, Bouvin NO (2010) Scheduling and development support in the scavenger cyber foraging system. Pervasive Mobile Comput 6(6):677–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shi C, Lakafosis V, Ammar MH, Zegura EW (2012) Serendipity: enabling remote computing among intermittently connected mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing. ACM, pp 145–154

  11. De Falco I, Scafuri U, Tarantino E (2014) Two new fast heuristics for mapping parallel applications on cloud computing. Future Gener Comput Syst 37:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao B, He L, Liu L, Li K, Jarvis SA (2012) From mobiles to clouds: developing energy-aware offloading strategies for workflows. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM/IEEE 13th international conference on grid computing. IEEE Computer Society, pp 139–146

  13. Maheswaran M, Ali S, Siegal HJ, Hensgen D, Freund RF (1999) Dynamic matching and scheduling of a class of independent tasks onto heterogeneous computing systems. In: Eighth heterogeneous computing workshop. IEEE, pp 30–44

  14. Braun TD, Siegel HJ, Beck N, Bölöni LL, Maheswaran M, Reuther AI, Robertson JP, Theys MD, Yao B, Hensgen D et al (2001) A comparison of eleven static heuristics for mapping a class of independent tasks onto heterogeneous distributed computing systems. J Parallel Distrib Comput 61(6):810–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Satyanarayanan M, Bahl P, Caceres R, Davies N (2009) The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput 8(4):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuervo E, Balasubramanian A, Cho D, Wolman A, Saroiu S, Chandra R, Bahl P (2010) Maui: making smartphones last longer with code offload. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, pp 49–62

  17. Gordon MS, Jamshidi DA, Mahlke SA, Mao ZM, Chen X (2012) Comet: code offload by migrating execution transparently. In: 10th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation. USENIX, pp 93–106

  18. Kosta S, Aucinas A, Hui P, Mortier R, Zhang X (2012) Thinkair: dynamic resource allocation and parallel execution in the cloud for mobile code offloading. In: 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM. IEEE, pp 945–953

  19. Satyanarayanan M, Lewis G, Morris E, Simanta S, Boleng J, Ha K (2013) The role of cloudlets in hostile environments. IEEE Pervasive Comput 12(4):40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McGilvary GA (2014) Ad hoc cloud computing. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh

  21. Meilander D, Glinka F, Gorlatch S, Lin L, Zhang W, Liao X (2014) Using mobile cloud computing for real-time online applications. In: 2014 2nd IEEE international conference on mobile cloud computing, services, and engineering (mobilecloud). IEEE, pp 48–56

  22. Whaiduzzaman M, Sookhak M, Gani A, Buyya R (2014) A survey on vehicular cloud computing. J Netw Comput Appl 40:325–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shi C, Ammar MH, Zegura EW, Naik M (2012) Computing in cirrus clouds: the challenge of intermittent connectivity. In: Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on mobile cloud computing. ACM, pp 23–28

  24. Shiraz M, Gani A (2014) A lightweight active service migration framework for computational offloading in mobile cloud computing. J Supercomput 68(2):978–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shumao O, Yang K, Zhang J (2007) An effective offloading middleware for pervasive services on mobile devices. Pervasive Mobile Comput 3(4):362–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shiraz M, Ahmed E, Gani A, Han Q (2014) Investigation on runtime partitioning of elastic mobile applications for mobile cloud computing. J Supercomput 67(1):84–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verbelen T, Stevens T, De Turck F, Dhoedt B (2013) Graph partitioning algorithms for optimizing software deployment in mobile cloud computing. Future Gener Comput Syst 29(2):451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shah SC, Chauhdary SH, Park M-S et al (2012) An effective and robust two-phase resource allocation scheme for interdependent tasks in mobile ad hoc computational grids. J Parallel Distrib Comput 72(12):1664–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shah SC (2015) Energy efficient and robust allocation of interdependent tasks on mobile ad hoc computational grid. Concurr Comput Practice Exp 27(5):1226–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eom H, Juste PS, Figueiredo R, Tickoo O, Illikkal R, Iyer R (2013) Machine learning-based runtime scheduler for mobile offloading framework. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM 6th international conference on utility and cloud computing. IEEE Computer Society, pp 17–25

  31. Shi C, Pandurangan P, Ni K, Yang J, Ammar M, Naik M, Zegura E (2013) Ic-cloud: computation offloading to an intermittently-connected cloud. Technical report, Georgia Institute of Technology

  32. Balakrishnan P, Tham C-K (2013) Energy-efficient mapping and scheduling of task interaction graphs for code offloading in mobile cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM 6th international conference on utility and cloud computing. IEEE Computer Society, pp 34–41

  33. Broch J, Maltz DA, Johnson DB, Hu Y-C, Jetcheva J (1998) A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking. ACM, pp 85–97

  34. Sarr C, Chaudet C, Chelius G, Lassous IG (2008) Bandwidth estimation for IEEE 802.11-based ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 7(10):1228–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen L (2005) Qos-aware routing based on bandwidth estimation for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 23(3):561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li J, Blake C, De Couto DSJ, Lee HI, Morris R (2001) Capacity of ad hoc wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking. ACM, pp 61–69

  37. Casteigts A, Flocchini P, Quattrociocchi W, Santoro N (2012) Time-varying graphs and dynamic networks. Int J Parallel Emerg Distrib Syst 27(5):387–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Camp T, Boleng J, Davies V (2002) A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Commun Mobile Comput 2(5):483–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Octava networks toolbox. https://github.com/aeolianine/octave-networks-toolbox

  40. Geekbench browser. http://browser.primatelabs.com

  41. Geek2mips. http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/hpm/book97/ch3/processor.list.txt

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the Applied Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province (2013FB009, 2013FB010) and theSpecial Funds for Middle-aged and Young Core Instructor Training Program of Yunnan University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Science and Engineering, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China

    Bo Li, Yijian Pei & Hao Wu

  2. School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, 430073, China

    Bin Shen

Authors
  1. Bo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yijian Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bin Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, B., Pei, Y., Wu, H. et al. Heuristics to allocate high-performance cloudlets for computation offloading in mobile ad hoc clouds. J Supercomput 71, 3009–3036 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1425-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1425-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation