Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Using accurate AIC-based performance models to improve the scheduling of parallel applications

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predictions based on analytical performance models can be used on efficient scheduling policies in order to select adequate resources for an optimal execution in terms of throughput and response time. However, developing accurate analytical models of parallel applications is a hard issue. The TIA (Tools for Instrumenting and Analysis) modeling framework provides an easy to use modeling method for obtaining analytical models of MPI applications. This method is based on modeling selection techniques and, in particular, on Akaike’s information criterion (AIC). In this paper, first the AIC-based performance model of the HPL benchmark is obtained using the TIA modeling framework. Then the use of this model for assessing the runtime estimation on different backfilling policies is analyzed in the GridSim simulator. The behavior of these simulations is compared with the equivalent simulations based on the theoretical model of the HPL provided by its developers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Albín JL, Lorenzo JA, Cabaleiro JC, Pena TF, Rivera FF (2007) Simulation of parallel applications in GridSim. In: 1st Iberian grid infrastructure conference proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dongarra JJ, Luszczek P, Petitet A (2003) The LINPACK benchmark: past, present and future. Concurr Comput 15(9):803–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jann J, Pattnaik P, Franke H, Wang F, Skovira J, Riodan J (1997) Modeling of workload in MMPs. In: IPPS/SPDP’97/JSSPP’97: proceedings of the job scheduling strategies for parallel processing

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martínez DR, Blanco V, Boullón M, Cabaleiro JC, Pena TF (2007) Analytical performance models of parallel programs in clusters. In: Parallel computing: architectures, algorithms and applications. ParCo 2007

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martínez DR, Pena TF, Cabaleiro JC, Rivera FF, Blanco V (2010) Performance modeling of MPI applications using model selection. In: 18th Euromicro conference on parallel, distributed and networkbased processing

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sulistio A, Cibej U, Venugopal S, Robic B, Buyya R (2008) A toolkit for modelling and simulating data grids: an extension to GridSim. Concurr Comput 20(13):1591–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsafrir D, Etsion Y, Feitelson DG (2007) Backfilling using system-generated predictions rather than user runtime estimates. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 18:789–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego R. Martínez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martínez, D.R., Albín, J.L., Pena, T.F. et al. Using accurate AIC-based performance models to improve the scheduling of parallel applications. J Supercomput 58, 332–340 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-011-0589-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-011-0589-1

Keywords

Navigation