Critical success factors taxonomy for software process deployment

• Ayala, C. (2006). Systematic construction of goal-oriented COTS taxonomies. In Proceedings of 3rd doctoral consortium at the 18th conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAISE 2006).

• Baddoo, N., & Hall, T. (2002a). Motivators of software process improvement: An analysis of practitioners’ views. Journal of Systems and Software, 62(02), 85–96.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baddoo, N., & Hall, T. (2002b). Software process improvement motivators: An analysis using multidimensional scaling. Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, 7(2), 93–114.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Baddoo, N., & Hall, T. (2003). De-motivators for software process improvement: An analysis of practitioners’ views. Journal of Systems and Software, 66(1), 23–33.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bayona, S., Calvo-Manzano, J., Cuevas, G., & San Feliu, T. (2008). Process deployment in a multi-site CMMI level 3 organization: A case study. In L. Roger (Eds.), Studies in computational intelligence (Vol. 131, pp. 147–153). Berlin: Springer.

• Bayona, S., Calvo-Manzano, J. A., Cuevas, G., & San Feliu, T. (2010). Taxonomía de factores críticos para el despliegue de procesos software. Revista Española de Innovación Calidad e Ingeniería del Software (REICIS), 6(3), 6–21.

  Google Scholar 

• Beecham, S., Hall, T., & Rainer, A. (2003). Software process problems in twelve software companies: An empirical analysis. Empirical Software Engineering, 8(1), 7–42.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Biolchini, J., Gomes, M., Cruz, N., & Horta, T. (2005). Systematic Review in Software Engineering, Software Engineering and Computer Science Department, Technical Report RT-ES679/05.

• Bruno, D., & Richmond, H. (2003). The truth about taxonomies. Information Management Journal, 37, 48–50, 52–53. http://news-business.vlex.com/vid/the-truth-about-taxonomies-54584663.

  Google Scholar 

• Busch, J. (2008). Teaching taxonomy methodology. http://www.taxonomystrategies.com/presentations/2008/Woodley-2008-07-24.pdf.

• Centelles, M. (2005). Taxonomías para la Categorización y la Organización de la Información en Sitios Web. Hipertext.net, http://www.hipertext.net.

• Chrissis, M., Konrad, M., & Shrum, S. (2007). CMMI second edition guidelines for process integration and product improvement. United States, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.

  Google Scholar 

• Craig, S. (2007). A taxonomy of information systems audits, assessments and reviews. http://www.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/auditing/a_taxonomy_of_information_systems_audits_assessments_and_reviews_1801?show=1801.php&cat=auditing.

• Crandall M. (2000). Using taxonomies effectively in the organization. Microsoft information services. http://www.infotoday.com/kmworld2000/presentations/crandall.ppt.

• Debar, H., & Dacier, W. (2000). A revised taxonomy for intrusion-detection systems. Journal Annals of Telecommunications, Paris: Springer, 55, 361–378.

  Google Scholar 

• Dyba, T. (2000). An instrument for measuring the key factors of success in software process improvement. Empirical Software Engineering, 5(4), 357–390.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Dyba, T. (2005). An empirical investigation of the key factors for success in software process improvement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(5), 410–424.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• El Emam, K., Goldenson, D., McCurley, J., & Herbsleb, J. (2001). Modeling the likelihood of software process improvement: An exploratory study. Empirical Software Engineering, 6(3), 207–229.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Goldenson, D., & Herbsleb, J. (1995). After the appraisal: A Systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-95-TR-009, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Eng. Inst.

• Graef, J. (2001). Managing taxonomies strategically. Montague Institute Review. http://www.montague.com/abstracts/taxonomy3.html.

• Guerrero, F., & Eterovic, Y. (2004). Adopting the SW-CMM in a small IT organization. IEEE Software, 21(4), 29–35.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hall, T., Rainer, A., & Baddoo, N. (2002). Implementing software process improvement: An empirical study. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 7(1), 3–15.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Humphrey, W. (1998). Managing the software process. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

  Google Scholar 

• Kaltio, T., & Kinnula, A. (2000). Deploying the defined software process. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 5(1), 65–83.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in software engineering, EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, Keele University.

• Lepasaar, M., Varkoi, T., & Jaakkola, H. (2001). Models and success factor of process change. In Proceedings of product focused software process improvement (PROFES 2001) (pp. 68–77), Sept. 2001. doi:10.1007/3-540-44813-6_9.

• MacDonell, S., Shepperd, M., Kitchenham, B., & Mendes, E. (2010). How reliable are systematic reviews in empirical software engineering? IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 36(5), 676–687.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McDermid, J., & Bennet, K. (1999). Software engineering research a critical appraisal. Proceedings of IEEE on Software Engineering, 146(4), 179–186.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Messnarz, R., Ekert, D., Reiner, M., & O’Suilleabhain, G. (2008). Human resources based improvement strategies-the learning factor. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 13(4), 355–362.

  Google Scholar 

• Montoni, M., Santos, G., Rocha, A., Figueiredo, S., Cabral, R., Barcellos, R., Barreto, A., Soares, A., Cerdeiral, C., & Lupo P. (2006). Taba Workstation: Supporting software process deployment based on CMMI and MR-MPS.BR COPPE/UFRJ. In Proceedings of PROFES 2006, LNCS 4034 (pp. 249–262). Berlin: Springer.

• Niazi, M., Willson, D., & Zowghi, D. (2006). Critical success factors for software process improvement implementation: An empirical study. Software Process: Improvement and Practice Journal, 11(2), 193–211.

  Google Scholar 

• Niazi, M., Wilson, D., & Zowghi, A. (2005). A framework for assisting the design of effective software process improvement implementation strategies. Journal of Systems and Software, 78(2), 204–222.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pino, J., García, F., & Piattini, M. (2008). Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: A systematic review. Software Quality Journal, Springer, 16(2), 237–261.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rainer, A., & Hall, T. (2002). Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: A maturity-based analysis. Journal of Systems and Software, 62(2), 71–84.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Regli, T., & Daniel, R. (2005). Taxonomies and meta data for business impact. Taxonomy strategies. http://www.taxonomystrategies.com/presentations/Taxonomy_Tutorial_Regli_and_Daniel(final).ppt.

• Stelzer, D., & Mellis, W. (1998). Success factors of organizational change in software process improvement. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 4(4), 227–250.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Valerio, G. (2003). Desarrollo de Taxonomías. http://memoriadigital.lacoctelera.net/post/2006/04/05/desarrollo-taxonomias.

• Verity. (2004). Classification, Taxonomies and You. Verity White Paper. http://www.weitkamper.com/download/verity/verity_mk0648.pdf.

• Whittaker, M., & Breininger, K. (2008). Taxonomy development for knowledge management. In Proceedings of world library and information congress 74th IFLA conference and council, Aug.

• Wilson, D., Hall, T., & Baddoo, N. (2007). A framework for evaluation and prediction of software process improvement success. Journal of Systems and Software, 59(2), 135–142.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zahran, S. (1998). Software process improvement: Practical guidelines for business success. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

  Google Scholar 

Download references