Abstract
The advancement of scientific research requires an adequate investment, which calls for promoting fair political decisions about the allocation of limited resources. In this context, funders need to be properly informed to assess the results of research lines or programmes. The WoS databases can help in making decisions, since they include the funding acknowledgements of documents along with additional useful data. The purpose of this paper is to analyse, in four different disciplines, the possible relation between international funding (from the EU and other foreign sources) and collaboration and impact. WoS articles with a Spanish address and written in English are selected (period 2010–2014), classifying them according to the existence or absence of funding acknowledgements, and identifying international sponsorship and the presence of EU funds. After applying some logistic regression models, the results confirm the hypotheses, except for some unexpected findings. In general, articles with international funding present greater collaboration, especially international and larger for those supported by only other non-EU foreign funds, with some differences between disciplines. This internationally funded research also achieves the highest citation rates, being unexpectedly higher for publications sponsored by EU funds, even showing less cooperation than those supported by other foreign funds. In the same way, the proportion of articles with only national funding is not diminished by their limited percentage of collaboration. In conclusion, this paper provides interesting information, both for funders and researchers, discussing the various characteristics and disparities between disciplines and funding sources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To allow comparisons between disciplines, the RCR is calculated as the count of citations received by a document in a given discipline and year with respect to the world average number of citations in the same discipline and year.
European Structural & Investment Funds (ESIF) consist of five funds including European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and European Social Fund (ESF). The EU countries administer the funds on a decentralised basis through shared management (extracted from https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/funding/ESIF_en).
References
Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Bordons, M., Costas, R., & Calero-Medina, C. (2018). Studying the research funding structure of countries through the analysis of funding acknowledgments. In 23rd International conference on science and technology indicators (STI 2018), September 12–14, 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS). Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/65363/STI2018_paper_195.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed January 29, 2019.
Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Morillo, F., & Bordons, M. (2017). Funding acknowledgments in the Web of Science: Completeness and accuracy of collected data. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1793–1812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2453-4.
Begum, M., & Lewison, G. (2017). Web of Science research funding information: Methodology for its use in analysis and evaluation. Journal of Scientometric Research, 6(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.6.2.12.
Braun, D. (1998). The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science. Research Policy, 27(8), 807–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00092-4.
Clark, B. Y., & Llorens, J. J. (2012). Investments in scientific research: Examining the funding threshold effects on scientific collaboration and variation by academic discipline. Policy Studies Journal, 40(4), 698–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00470.x.
Costas, R., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2012). Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1647–1661. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22692.
Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705055535.
Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008.
Díaz-Faes, A. A., & Bordons, M. (2014). Acknowledgements in scientific publications: Presence in Spanish science and text patterns across disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(9), 1834–1849. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23081.
Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2013). Impact of funding on scientific output and collaboration: A survey of literature. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 12(04), 1350037. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649213500378.
Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2015). How to receive more funding for your research? Get connected to the right people! PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133061.
Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2016). How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1093–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1825-x.
Gök, A., Rigby, J., & Shapira, P. (2016). The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23406.
Grassano, N., Rotolo, D., Hutton, J., Lang, F., & Hopkins, M. M. (2017). Funding data from publication acknowledgments: Coverage, uses, and limitations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 999–1017. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23737.
Huang, M. H., & Huang, M. J. (2018). An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspectives in the G9 countries. Scientometrics, 115(2), 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2677-y.
Jaffe, A. B. (2002). Building programme evaluation into the design of public research-support programmes. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.22.
Langfeldt, L., Bloch, C. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2015). Options and limitations in measuring the impact of research grants-evidence from Denmark and Norway. Research Evaluation, 24(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv012.
Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776961.
Lewison, G. (1994). Publications from the European Community’s Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP): Multinationality, acknowledgement of support, and citations. Scientometrics, 31(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018556.
Lewison, G., & Dawson, G. (1998). The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research. Scientometrics, 41(1–2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457963.
MacLean, M., Anderson, J., & Martin, B. R. (1998a). Identifying research priorities in public sector funding agencies: Mapping science outputs on to user needs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524308.
MacLean, M., Davies, C., Lewison, G., & Anderson, J. (1998b). Evaluating the research activity and impact of funding agencies. Research Evaluation, 7(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/7.1.7.
Mongeon, P., Brodeur, C., Beaudry, C., & Larivière, V. (2016). Concentration of research funding leads to decreasing marginal returns. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw007.
Morillo, F. (2016). Public–private interactions reflected through the funding acknowledgements. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2032-0.
Morillo, F., & Álvarez-Bornstein, B. (2018). How to automatically identify major research sponsors selecting keywords from the WoS Funding Agency field. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1755–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2947-8.
Nomaler, Ö., Frenken, K., & Heimeriks, G. (2013). Do more distant collaborations have more citation impact? Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 966–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.001.
Rigby, J. (2011). Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: New dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 20(5), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13164389670392.
Wang, J., Lee, Y. N., & Walsh, J. P. (2018). Funding model and creativity in science: Competitive versus block funding and status contingency effects. Research Policy, 47(6), 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.014.
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: An enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 87(3), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0362-5.
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2015). Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0117727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117727.
Wu, D., Yuan, L., Li, R., & Li, J. (2018). Decomposing inequality in research funding by university-institute sub-group: A three-stage nested Theil index. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1312–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.007.
Yan, E., Wu, C., & Song, M. (2018). The funding factor: A cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact. Scientometrics, 115(1), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2583-8.
Zhao, D. (2010). Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: A case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics, 84(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0191-y.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant CSO2014-57826-P). Valuable assistance is also acknowledged from José Manuel Rojo (Statistical Analysis Unit, CCHS-CSIC) and useful comments from two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morillo, F. Collaboration and impact of research in different disciplines with international funding (from the EU and other foreign sources). Scientometrics 120, 807–823 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03150-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03150-8