Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic brain tumor segmentation from magnetic resonance images using superpixel-based approach

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer is the second leading cause of deaths worldwide, reported by World Health Organization (WHO). The abnormal growth of cells, which should die at the time but they remained in body organ which makes tumor and brain tumor is one of them. During its treatment planning, brain tumor segmentation plays its vital role, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is most widely used medical imaging modalities to scan brain tissues, and segmentation of brain tumor from MRI scans is still a challenging task, due to the variability in spatial, structure and appearance of the brain tumor. The existing brain tumor segmentation techniques are still suffering from an inadequate performance, dependent on initial assumptions, and required manual interference. The main challenge is to segment out the accurate tumor from MRI images, and to give the solution for its variability in size due to spatial change in image slices. The proposed model in an automated manners segment out abnormal tissues from MRI images. The proposed model has some aspects like we apply some pre-processing techniques, and apply superpixel-segmentation with their improved tuned parameter values. We have extracted different features for the superpixels in the images such that statistical features, fractal features, texton features, curvature feature and SIFT features. Due to unbalanced feature vector, we have proposed class balancing algorithm, and then apply SVM, KNN, Decision Tree and Ensemble classifiers, to classify the normal and abnormal superpixels. To evaluate the proposed model, we used MICCAI BRATS-2017 MRI training dataset. The Dice Coefficient (DSC), precision, sensitivity, and balanced error rate (BER) against the ground truths for FLAIR sequence in LGG volumes have been obtained as 0.8593, 87%, 93%, and 0.08 respectively. The DSC, precision, sensitivity, and BER against the ground truths for FLAIR sequence in HGG volumes have been obtained as 0.8528, 87%, 97%, and 0.08 respectively. It is evident from the quantitative and visual results that the proposed model provides a close match to the expert delineation for the FLAIR sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer.

  2. http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/ucacarr/teaching/ndsp/curvature.pdf.

  3. https://www.med.upenn.edu/sbia/brats2017/data.html.

  4. https://www.med.upenn.edu/sbia/brats2017/data.html.

References

  1. Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K, Lucchi A, Fua P, Süsstrunk S (2012) SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(11):2274–2282

  2. Alqazzaz S, Sun X, Yang X, Nokes L (2019) Automated brain tumor segmentation on multi-modal MR image using SegNet. Comput Vis Media 5:209–2192

  3. Attique M, Gilanie G, Mehmood MS, Naweed MS, Ikram M, Kamran JA, Vitkin A (2012) Colorization and automated segmentation of human T2 MR brain images for characterization of soft tissues. PLoS One 7(3):e33616

  4. Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, pp 679–698

  5. Chen H, Qin Z, Ding Y, Tian L, Qin Z (2020) Brain tumor segmentation with deep convolutional symmetric neural network. Neurocomputing 392:305–313

  6. Costa AF, Humpire-Mamani G, Traina AJM (2012) An efficient algorithm for fractal analysis of textures. Paper presented at the 2012 25th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images

  7. Elangovan A, Jeyaseelan T (2016) Medical imaging modalities: a survey. Paper presented at the 2016 International Conference on emerging trends in engineering, technology and science (ICETETS)

  8. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F (2021) Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer 149(4):778–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilanie G, Attique M, Naweed S, Ahmed E, Ikram M (2013) Object extraction from T2 weighted brain MR image using histogram based gradient calculation. Pattern Recognit Lett 34:1356–136312

  10. Gilanie G, Bajwa UI, Waraich MM, Habib Z, Ullah H, Nasir M (2018) Classification of normal and abnormal brain MRI slices using Gabor texture and support vector machines. Signal Image Video Process 12:479–4873

  11. Gilanie G, Bajwa UI, Waraich MM, Habib H (2019) Automated and reliable brain radiology with texture analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and cross datasets validation. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 29:531–5384

  12. Gilanie G, Bajwa UI, Waraich MM, Habib Z (2019) Computer aided diagnosis of brain abnormalities using texture analysis of MRI images. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 29(3):260–271

  13. Haeck T, Maes F, Suetens P (2015) Automated model-based segmentation of brain tumors in MR images. Proceedings BraTS Challenge 2015:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henriksen JJ (2007) 3D surface tracking and approximation using Gabor filters. South Denmark University, 28

  15. Kadkhodaei M, Samavi S, Karimi N, Mohaghegh H, Soroushmehr SMR, Ward K, . . . Najarian K (2016) Automatic segmentation of multimodal brain tumor images based on classification of super-voxels. Paper presented at the 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)

  16. Li Y, Jia F, Qin J (2016) Brain tumor segmentation from multimodal magnetic resonance images via sparse representation. Artif Intell Med 73:1–13

  17. Li W, Hosseini Jafari O, Rother C (2018) Deep object co-segmentation. Paper presented at the Asian Conference on Computer Vision

  18. Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K, Kirby J, Burren Y, Porz N, Slotboom J, Wiest R et al (2014) The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34(10):1993–2024

  19. Nabizadeh N, Kubat M (2015) Brain tumors detection and segmentation in MR images: Gabor wavelet vs. statistical features. Comput Electr Eng 45:286–301

  20. Nabizadeh N, Kubat M (2017) Automatic tumor segmentation in single-spectral MRI using a texture-based and contour-based algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 77:1–10

  21. Pei L, Bakas S, Vossough A, Reza SM, Davatzikos C, Iftekharuddin KM (2020)  Longitudinal brain tumor segmentation prediction in MRI using feature and label fusion. Biomed Signal Process Control 55:101648

  22. Rehman ZU, Naqvi SS, Khan TM, Khan MA, Bashir T (2019) Fully automated multi-parametric brain tumour segmentation using superpixel based classification. Expert Syst Appl 118:598–613

  23. Schroeder M (2009) Fractals, chaos, power laws: Minutes from an infinite paradise. Courier Corporation

  24. Sheela CJJ, Suganthi G (2019) Automatic brain tumor segmentation from MRI using greedy snake model and fuzzy C-means optimization. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences

  25. Soltaninejad M, Yang G, Lambrou T, Allinson N, Jones TL, Barrick TR, Howe FA, Ye X (2017) Automated brain tumour detection and segmentation using superpixel-based extremely randomized trees in FLAIR MRI. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(2):183–203

  26. Sompong C, Wongthanavasu S (2017) An efficient brain tumor segmentation based on cellular automata and improved tumor-cut algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 72:231–244

  27. Tan L, Ma W, Xia J, Sarker S (2021) Multimodal magnetic resonance image brain tumor segmentation based on ACU-Net network. IEEE Access 9:14608–14618

  28. Yang T, Song J, Li L (2019) A deep learning model integrating SK-TPCNN and random forests for brain tumor segmentation in MRI. Biocybern Biomed Eng 39:613–6233

  29. Zeineldin RA, Karar ME, Coburger J, Wirtz CR, Burgert O (2020) DeepSeg: deep neural network framework for automatic brain tumor segmentation using magnetic resonance FLAIR images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 15(6):909–920

  30. Zhang J, Jiang W, Wang R, Wang L (2014) Brain MR image segmentation with spatial constrained k-mean algorithm and dual-tree complex wavelet transform. J Med Syst 38(9):1–6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usama Ijaz Bajwa.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interests/Competing interests

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iqbal, M.J., Bajwa, U.I., Gilanie, G. et al. Automatic brain tumor segmentation from magnetic resonance images using superpixel-based approach. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 38409–38427 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13166-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13166-7

Keywords

Navigation