Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic emission source localization method for high-speed train bogie

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bogie is one of the most critical parts of high-speed train and is directly related to the operation quality and safety of the train. However, currently no dynamic non-destructive testing method exists for real-time monitoring. Therefore, this paper proposes a new damage localization method for high-speed train bogie dynamic testing. The acoustic emission testing technology is applied to test the vulnerable welding parts of the bogie with time reversal localization method. Firstly, the bogie welding parts structure model based on finite element software is established. Then an acoustic emission damage signal is sent from the model and the acoustic emission source signal is received by the preset acoustic emission sensor. And the accurate localization of damage is achieved by dealing with the received signal according to the time reversal focusing principle and imaging the acoustic emission source. The simulation experiments show that the proposed method can accurately find the damaged localization. And finally, the method has been verified through experiment, and the results show it can effectively improve signal energy of the damage source, and the position of the damage source can be shown accurately through signal reconstruction and localization in the detection area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fanyong M (2012) Analysis of machining process for bogie frame of EMU. Mech Res Appl 3:96–97

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niccolini G, Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G (2011) Acoustic emission monitoring of the Syracuse Athena temple: scale invariance in the timing of ruptures. Phys Rev Lett 106(10):108503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fotouhi M, Saeedifar M, Sadeghi S (2015) Investigation of the damage mechanisms for mode I delamination growth in foam core sandwich composites using acoustic emission. Struct Health Monit 14(3):265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu Y, Wang L, Huang X (2015) On-line sizing of pneumatically conveyed particles through acoustic emission detection and signal analysis. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 64(5):1100–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li D, Chen Z, Feng Q (2015) Damage analysis of CFRP-confined circular concrete-filled steel tubular columns by acoustic emission techniques. Smart Mater Struct 24(8):085017

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Siracusano G, Lamonaca F, Tomasello R (2016) A framework for the damage evaluation of acoustic emission signals through Hilbert-Huang transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 75(15):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rabiei M, Modarres M (2013) Quantitative methods for structural health management using in situ acoustic emission monitoring. Int J Fatigue 49:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silversides I, Maslouhi A, LaPlante G (2013) Acoustic emission monitoring of interlaminar delamination onset in carbon fibre composites. Struct Health Monit 12(2):126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Torres-Arredondo MA, Tibaduiza DA, McGugan M (2013) Multivariate data-driven modelling and pattern recognition for damage detection and identification for acoustic emission and acousto-ultrasonics. Smart Mater Struct 22(10):105023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Builo SI, Ivanochkin PG, Myasnikova NA (2013) Diagnostics of critical points of the friction coefficient of a multilayer nanomodified antifriction coating by an acoustic emission technique. Russ J Nondestruct Test 49(6):318–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jomdecha C (2007) Study on source location using an acoustic emission system for various corrosion types. NDT&E Int 40(8):584–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu H, Li Y, Uemura T, Kim H, Serikawa S (2018) Low illumination underwater light field images reconstruction using deep convolutional neural networks. Futur Gener Comput Syst 82:142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boris AZ, Adrian P, Sepand M, Obdulia L (2015) Structural health monitoring of liquid-filled tanks: a Bayesian approach for location of acoustic emission sources. Smart Mater Struct 24(1):015017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ozevin D (2011) Geometry-based spatial acoustic source location for spaced structures. Struct Health Monit 10(5):503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mostafapour A, Davoodi S, Ghareaghaji M (2014) Acoustic emission source location in plates using wavelet analysis and cross time frequency spectrum. Ultrasonics 54(8):2055–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dehghan NE, Farhidzadeh A, Salamone S (2013) Nonlinear Kalman filtering for acoustic emission source localization in anisotropic panels. Ultrasonics 54(2):486–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu H, Li Y, Uemura T, Ge Z, Xu X, He L, Serikawa S, Kim H (2017) FDCNet: filtering deep convolutional network for marine organism classification. Multimed Tools Appl 77(17):21847–21860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiaopeng Y, Linhui P, Shuangle G (2012) The time reversal signal temporal focus of rough seafloor wave guide. Period Ocean Univ China 42(7):178–182

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu S, Liu J, Xu S (2012) Experimental studies on pillar failure characteristics based on acoustic emission location technique. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22(11):2792–2798

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Hensman J, Mills R, Pierce SG (2010) Locating acoustic emission sources in complex structures using Gaussian processes. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(1):211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramin M, Paul Z, Juan MC (2019) Acoustic emission Bayesian source location: onset time challenge. Mech Syst Signal Process 123(15):483–495

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mathias F (1992) Time reversal of ultrasonic field--part I: basic principles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 39(5):555–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu F, Thomas JL, Mathias F (1992) Time reversal of ultrasonic fields-part II: experimental results. IEEE trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect, Freq. Contr. 39(5):567–578

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang CH, Rose JT, Chang FK (2004) A synthetic time reversal imaging method for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 13(2):415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fink M (1999) Time reversal of ultrasonic fields part I: basic principles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 39(5):555–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qiu L, Yuan S, Yang W (2014) On research of time reversal imaging method and structural health monitoring system. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech 46(4):927–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chun HW, James TR, Fu-Kuo C (2004) A synthetic time reversal imaging method for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 13(2):415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Q, Chen J, He C (2015) Location algorithm for source of acoustic emission based on time reversal. Chin J Sens Actuators 28(11):1659–1663

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gutkin R, Green CJ, Vangrattanachai S (2011) On acoustic emission for failure investigation in CFRP: pattern recognition and peak frequency analyses. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(4):1393–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li X, Luo G, Long S (2016) Location method of acoustic emission by time reversal focusing and enhancing for steel plate. Chin J Sci Instrum 37(8):1792–1799

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yao C, Boyuan C, Xia W (2019) Air-coupled lamb waves imaging for impact damage of CFRP plates based on the time reversal damage index. Fail Anal Prev 14(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lu H, Li Y, Mu S, Wang D, Kim H, Serikawa S (2018) Motor anomaly detection for unmanned aerial vehicles using reinforcement learning. IEEE Internet Things J 5(4):2315–2322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cong H, Qiong W, Qiufeng L (2016) Application of time reversal on acoustic emission source localization of train bogie. China Meas Test 42(12):136–139 +144

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11764030 and 51865033), Special Plan for the Construction of Superiority Scientific and Technological Innovation Teams in Jiangxi Province (Grant No. 20171BCB24008), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (Grant No. 20171BAB206039), Science and Technology Planning Project of Jiangxi Quality Supervision Bureau (GZJKE201810), Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Education Department (Grant No. GJJ170577 and GJJ180525), and Nanchang Hangkong University Graduate Innovation Special Fund (Grant No. YC2019044).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiufeng Li.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, X., Chen, Y., Lu, C. et al. Acoustic emission source localization method for high-speed train bogie. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 14933–14949 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08580-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08580-3

Keywords

Navigation