Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

A Swarm Intelligence Based (SIB) method for optimization in designs of experiments

  • Published:
Natural Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural heuristic methods, like the particle swarm optimization and many others, enjoy fast convergence towards optimal solution via inter-particle communications. Many applications of such methods are applied to the optimization in engineering, but only a few to the optimization in statistics. It is especially difficult to implement in the optimization problems of experimental designs as the search space is mostly discrete, while most natural heuristic methods are limited to searching continuous domains. This paper introduces a new natural heuristic method called Swarm Intelligence Based method for optimizing problem with a discrete domain. It includes two new operations, MIX and MOVE, for combining two particles and selecting the best particle respectively. This method is ready for the search of both continuous and discrete domains, and its global best particle is guaranteed to monotonically move towards the optimum. Several demonstrations on the optimization of experimental designs are given at the end of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bera R, Roy JS (2013) Thinning of elliptical and concentric elliptical antenna arrays using particle swarm optimization. Microw Rev 19:2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Box KHV, Cox DR (1962) Some systematic supersaturated designs. Technometrics 4:489–495

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd S, Vandenverghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braendler D, Hendtlass T (2002) The suitability of particle swarm optimization for training neural hardware. In: International conference on industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert system, 190–199 (2002)

  • Brandstatter B, Baumgartner U (2002) Particle swarm optimization—mass-spring system analogon. IEEE Trans Magn 38:997–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulutoglu DA (2007) Cyclicly constructed \(E(s^2)\)optimal supersaturated designs. J Stat Plan Inference 137:2413–2428

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bulutoglu DA, Cheng CS (2004) Construction of \(E(s^2)\)-optimal supersaturated designs. Annal Stat 32:1662–1678

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti R, Chattopadhyay PK, Basu M, Panigrahi CK (2006) Particle swarm optimization technique for dynamic economic dispatch. J Inst Eng (India) 87:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen RB, Hsieh DN, Hung Y, Wang W (2013) Optimizing Latin hypercube designs by particle swarm. Stat Comput 23:663–676

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clerc M (2006) Particle swarm optimization. ISTE, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Craigen R, Faucher G, Low R, Wares T (2013) Circulant partial Hadamard matrices. Linear Algebra Appl 439:3307–3317

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M (1992) Learning and Natural Algorithms. PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

  • Eberhart R, Shi Y (2001) Particle swarm optimization: developments, application and resources. In: IEEE proceedings of the congress on evolutionary computation 1:81–85

  • Engelbrecht AP (2005) Fundamentals of computational swarm intelligence. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Eusuff M, Lansey K, Pasha F (2006) Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm: a memetic meta-heuristic for discrete optimization. Eng Optim 38:129–154

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser A (1957) Simulation of genetic systems by automatic digital computers. I. Introduction. Aust J Biol Sci 10:484–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geramita A, Seberry J (1979) Quadratic forms, orthogonal designs, and Hadamard matrices, Lecture notes in pure and applied mathematics series 45, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

  • Gong T, Tuson AL (2008) Particle swarm optimization for quadratic assignment problems—a forma analysis approach. Int J Comput Intell Res 4:177–185

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Horadam KJ (2007) Hadamard matrices and their applications. Priceton University Press, Princeton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conferenec on neural networks 4:1942–1948

  • Low RM, Stamp M, Craigen R, Faucher G (2005) Unpredictable binary strings. Congr Numer 177:65–75

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MD, Mitchell TJ (1995) Exploratory designs for computational experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 43:381–402

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Orouskhano M, Orouskhani Y, Mansouri M, Teshnehlab M (2013) A novel cat swarm optimization algorithm for unconstrained optimization problems. I J Inf Technol Comput Sci 11:32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Panduro MA, Brizuela CA, Balderas LI, Acosta DA (2009) A comparison of genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization and the differential evolution method for the design of scannable circular antenna arrays. Prog Electromagn Res B 13:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passino KM (2002) Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Syst Mag 22:52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoa FKH, Chen RB, Wang W, Wong WK (2016) Optimizing two-level supersaturated designs using swarm intelligence techniques. Technometrics 58:43–49

  • Plackett RL, Burman JP (1946) The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika 33:305–325

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation, 69–73

  • Xu H, Phoa FKH, Wong WK (2009) Recent developments in nonregular fractional factorial designs. Stat Surv 3:18–46

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Career Development Award of Academia Sinica (Taiwan) grant number 103-CDA-M04 and Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan) grant numbers 102-2628-M-001-002-MY3 and 104-2118-M-001-016-MY2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick Kin Hing Phoa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phoa, F.K.H. A Swarm Intelligence Based (SIB) method for optimization in designs of experiments. Nat Comput 16, 597–605 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-016-9555-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-016-9555-4

Keywords

Navigation