Sensor network optimization of gearbox based on dependence matrix and improved discrete shuffled frog leaping algorithm

• Ahandani MA (2014) A diversified shuffled frog leaping: an application for parameter identification. Appl Math Comput 239:1–16

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Altaf S, Al-Anbuky A, Hosseini HG (2014) Fault signal propagation in a network of distributed motors. In: Proceedings of IEEE 8th international power engineering and optimization conference (PEOCO2014), Langkawi, The Jewel of Kedah, Malaysia, pp 59–63

• Azam M, Pattipati K, Patterson-Hine A (2004) Optimal sensor allocation for fault detection and isolation. IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybernet 2:1309–1314

  Google Scholar 

• Bafroui HH, Ohadi A (2014) Application of wavelet energy and Shannon entropy for feature extraction in gearbox fault detection under varying speed conditions. Neurocomputing 133:437–445

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bagajewicz M, Fuxman A, Uribe A (2004) Instrumentation network design and upgrade for process monitoring and fault detection. AIChE J 50(8):1870–1880

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barati M, Farsangi MM (2014) Solving unit commitment problem by a binary shuffled frog leaping algorithm. IET Gener Transm Dis 8(6):1050–1060

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bhushan M, Rengaswamy R (2000) Design of sensor location based on various fault diagnostic observability and reliability criteria. Comput Chem Eng 24(2–7):735–741

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cao HR, Niu LK, He ZJ (2012) Method for vibration response simulation and sensor placement optimization of a machine tool spindle system with a bearing defect. Sensors 12(7):8732–8754

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Casillas MV, Puig V, Garza-Castanón LE, Rosich A (2013) Optimal sensor placement for leak location in water distribution networks using genetic algorithms. Sensors 13(11):14984–15005

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chen Y, Wen JY, Jiang L, Cheng SJ (2013) Hybrid algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects. IET Gener Transm Dis 7(10):1096–1104

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cheng SF, Azarian MH, Pecht MG (2010) Sensor systems for prognostics and health management. Sensors 10(6):5774–5797

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chow HM, Lam HF, Yin T, Au SK (2011) Optimal sensor configuration of a typical transmission tower for the purpose of structural model updating. Struct Control Health 18(3):305–320

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eusuff MM, Lansey KE (2003) Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J Water Res Pl-Asce 129(3):210–225

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eusuff M, Lansey K, Pasha F (2006) Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm: a memetic meta-heuristic for discrete optimization. Eng. Optim. 38(2):129–154

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Fu KC (2009) Redundant instruments placement using ACO. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on computational intelligence and natural computing (CINC2009), pp 151–154

• Hamilton A, Cleary A, Quail F (2014) Development of a novel wear detection system for wind turbine gearboxes. IEEE Sens J 14(2):465–473

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Han T, Yang B, Lee JM (2005) A new condition monitoring and fault diagnosis system of induction motors using artificial intelligence algorithms. In IEEE international conference on electric machines and drives, pp 1967–1974

• Hang J, Zhang JZ, Cheng M (2014) Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on multi-sensors information fusion technology. IET Renew Power Gener 8(3):289–298

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT Press, USA

  Google Scholar 

• IEEE STD 1522-2004. IEEE trial use standard testability and diagnosability characteristics and metrics, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Standards Press

• Jazebi S, Haji MM, Naghizadeh RA (2014) Distribution network reconfiguration in the presence of harmonic loads: optimization techniques and analysis. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 5(4):1929–1937

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jin S, Liu YH, Lin ZQ (2012) A Bayesian network approach for fixture fault diagnosis in launch of the assembly process. Int J Prod Res 50(23):6655–6666

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kavousi-Fard A, Akbari-Zadeh M-R (2013) Reliability enhancement using optimal distribution feeder reconfiguration. Neurocomputing 106:1–11

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Korkali M, Abur A (2013) Optimal deployment of wide-area synchronized measurements for fault-location observability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(1):482–489

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kulkarni RV, Venayagamoorthy GK (2010) Bio-inspired algorithms for autonomous deployment and localization of sensor nodes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 40(6):663–675

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Li F, Upadhyaya BR (2011) Design of sensor placement for an integral pressurized water reactor using fault diagnostic observability and reliability criteria. Nucl Technol 173(1):17–25

  Google Scholar 

• Li R, He D, Bechhoefe E (2012a) Gear fault location detection for split torque gearbox using AE sensors. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cy C 42(6):1308–1317

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Li F, Upadhyaya BR, Perillo SRP (2012b) Fault diagnosis of helical coil steam generator systems of an integral pressurized water reactor using optimal sensor selection. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 59(2):403–410

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liu W, Gao WC, Sun Y, Xu MJ (2008) Optimal sensor placement for spatial lattice structure based on genetic algorithms. J Sound Vib 317(1–2):175–189

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Martello S, Pisinger D, Toth P (2000) New trends in exact algorithms for the 0–1 knapsack problem. Eur J Oper Res 123(2):325–332

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Martin WN, Ghoshal A, Sundaresan MJ, Lebby GL, Pratap PR, Schulz MJ (2005) An artificial neural receptor system for structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 4(3):229–245

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mini S, Udgata SK, Sabat SL (2014) Sensor deployment and scheduling for target coverage problem in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 14(3):636–644

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mohanty AR, Kar C (2006) Fault detection in a multistage gearbox by demodulation of motor current waveform. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 53(4):1285–1297

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nimityongskul S, Kammer DC (2009) Frequency response based sensor placement for the mid-frequency range. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(4):1169–1179

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pan HX, Wei XY (2010) Optimal placement of sensor in gearbox fault diagnosis based on VPSO. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on natural computation,, pp 3383–3387

• Pandey MD, Sarkar A (2002) Comparison of a simple approximation for multinormal integration with an importance sampling-based simulation method. Probab Eng Mech 17(2):215–218

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pourali M, Mosleh A (2013) A functional sensor placement optimization method for power systems health monitoring. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 49(4):1711–1719

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Radac M, Precup R, Petriu EM, Preitl S (2014) Iterative data-driven tuning of controllers for nonlinear systems with constraints. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(11):6360–6368

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Raghuraj R, Bhushan M, Engaswamy R (1999) Locating sensors in complex chemical plants based on fault diagnostic observability criteria. AIChE J 45(2):310–322

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Seraji H, Serrano N (2009) A multisensor decision fusion system for terrain safety assessment. IEEE Trans Robot 25(1):99–108

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tao D, Tang SJ, Liu L (2013) Constrained artificial fish-swarm based area coverage optimization algorithm for directional sensor networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE 10th international conference on mobile Ad-Hoc and sensor systems (MASS2013). pp 304–309

• Urrego LR, Moreno EG, Anglada FM, Salvador AC, Cucarella EQ (2013) Hybrid analysis in the latent nestling method applied to fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 10(2):415–430

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Venkatasubramanian V, Rengaswamy R, Kavuri SN (2003) A review of process fault detection and diagnosis part II: qualitative models and search strategies. Comput Chem Eng 27(3):313–326

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wolf CM, Hanson KM, Lorenz RD, Valenzuela MA (2013) Using the traction drive as the sensor to evaluate and track deterioration in electrified vehicle gearboxes. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 49(6):2610–2618

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Worden K, Burrows AP (2001) Optimal sensor placement for fault detection. Eng Struct 23(8):885–901

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yang SM, Qiu J, Liu GJ, Yang P (2013) Sensor selection and optimization for aerospace system health management under uncertainty testing. Trans Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space 56(4):187–196

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zappala D, Tavner PJ, Crabtree CJ, Sheng S (2014) Side-band algorithm for automatic wind turbine gearbox fault detection and diagnosis. IET Renew Power Gener 8(4):380–389

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhen ZY, Wang DB, Liu YY (2009) Improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm for continuous optimization problem. In IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC2009), pp 2992–2995

• Zhong BL, Huang R (2007) Introduction to machine fault diagnosis. China machine press, Beijing

  Google Scholar 

• Zhou XW, Wang YY, Tian XX, Guo RQ (1997) A tabu search algorithm for quadratic 0–1 programming problem. Chin Q J Math 12(4):98–102

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references