Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Outage Performance Analysis of Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks for NOMA Transmissions

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate radio frequency (RF) energy harvesting (EH) in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) using non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) uplink transmission with regard to a probable secrecy outage during the transmission between sensor nodes (SNs) and base station (BS) in the presence of eavesdroppers (EAVs). In particular, the communication protocol is divided into two phases: 1) first, the SNs harvest energy from multiple power transfer stations (PTSs), and then, 2) the cluster heads are elected to transmit information to the BS using the harvested energy. In the first phase, we derive a 2D RF energy model to harvest energy for the SNs. During the second phase, the communication faces multiple EAVs who attempt to capture the information of legitimate users; thus, we propose a strategy to select cluster heads and implement the NOMA technique in the transmission of the cluster heads to enhance the secrecy performance. For the performance evaluation, the exact closed-form expressions for the secrecy outage probability (SOP) at the cluster heads are derived. A nearly optimal EH time algorithm for the cluster head is also proposed. In addition, the impacts of system parameters, such as the EH time, the EH efficiency coefficient, the distance between the cluster heads and the BS, and the number of SNs as well as EAVs on the SOP, are investigated. Finally, Monte Carlo simulations are performed to show the accuracy of the theoretical analysis; it is also shown that the secrecy performance of NOMA in RF EH WSN can be improved using the optimal EH time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wan J, Tang S, Shu Z, Li D, Wang S, Imran M, Vasilakos AV (2016) Software-defined industrial internet of things in the context of industry 4.0. IEEE Sens J 16(20):7373–7380

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang S, Wan J, Li D, Zhang C (2015) Implementing smart factory of industrie 4.0: an outlook. Int J Distrib Sensor Netw 12(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang S, Wan J, Zhang D, Li D, Zhang C (2016) Towards the smart factory for industrie 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system assisted with big data based feedback and coordination elsevier computer networks. Comput Netw 101:158–168

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Turjman F, Radwan A (2017) Data delivery in wireless multimedia sensor networks: challenging and defying in the IoT era. IEEE Wireless Commun 24(5):126–131

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams JM, Khanna R, Ruiz-Rosero JP, Pisharody G, Qian Y, Carlson CR, Liu H, Rmirez-Gonzalez G (2017) Weaving the wireless web: toward a low-power, dense wireless sensor network for the industrial IoT. IEEE Microwave Mag 18(7):40–63

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ye W, Ordonez F (2008) Robust optimization models for energy-limited wireless sensor networks under distance uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun 7(6):2161–2169

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trapasiya SD, Soni HB (2017) Energy efficient policy selection in wireless sensor network using cross layer approach. IET Wireless Sens Syst 7(6):191–197

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu H-H, Su J-J, Chou CF (2017) On energy-efficient straight-line routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Syst J 11(4):2374–2382

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen TG, So-In C, Nguyen NG, Phoemphon S (2017) A novel energy-efficient clustering protocol with area coverage awareness for wireless sensor networks. Peer to Peer Networking and Applicat 10(3):519–536

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheng Z, Mahapatra C, Zhu C, Leung VCM (2015) Recent advances in industrial wireless sensor networks toward efficient management in IoT. IEEE Access 3:622–637

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li F, Li Y, Zhao W, Chen Q, Tang W (2006) An adaptive coordinated MAC protocol based on dynamic power management for wireless sensor networks. In: Proc Int Conf on wireless Commun and mobile computing, pp 1073–1078

  12. Li Y, Yu N, Zhang W, Zhao W, You X, Daneshmand M (2011) Enhancing the performance of LEACH protocol in wireless sensor networks. In: Proc IEEE Conf on Comput Commun workshops, pp 223–228

  13. Cao B, Ge Y, Kim CW, Feng G, Tan H, Li Y (2013) An experimental study for inter-user interference mitigation in wireless body sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 13(10):3585–3595

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen TG, So-In C, Nguyen NG (2017) Barrier coverage deployment algorithms for mobile sensor networks. J of Internet Technology 18(7):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li T, Dong Y, Fan P, Letaief KB (2017) Wireless communications with RF-based energy harvesting: from information theory to green systems. IEEE Access PP(99):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shaikh FK, Zeadally S (2016) Energy harvesting in wireless sensor networks: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:1041–1054

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van NTP, Hasan SF, Gui X, Mukhopadhyay S, Tran H (2017) Three-step two-way decode and forward relay with energy harvesting. IEEE Commun Lett 21(4):857–860

    Google Scholar 

  18. Habibu H, Zungeru AM, Susan AA, Gerald I (2014) Energy harvesting wireless sensor networks: design and modeling. Int J Wireless Mobile Netw 6(5):17–31

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alanazi A, Elleithy K (2015) Real-time QoS routing protocols in wireless multimedia sensor networks: study and analysis. Sensors 15(9):22209–22233

    Google Scholar 

  20. Teng Z, Kim K (2010) A survey on real-time MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks. Commun and Network 2(2):104–112

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rachamalla S, Kancharla A (2013) Survey of real-time routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Int J of Comput Sci Eng Survey 4(3):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hua Y-K, Pang A-C, Hsiu P-C, Zhuang W, Liu P (2012) Distributed throughput optimization for zigbee cluster-tree networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 23(23):513–520

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhiqiang W, Jinhong Y, Ng DWK, Elkashlan M, Zhiguo D (2016) A survey of downlink non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G wireless communication networks. ZTE Commun 14(4):17–25

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dai L, Wang B, Yuan Y, Han S, I C-l, Wang Z (2015) Non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G: solutions, challenges, opportunities, and future research trends. IEEE Commun Mag 53(9):74–81

    Google Scholar 

  25. Men J, Ge J (2015) Performance analysis of non-orthogonal multiple access in downlink cooperative network. IET Commun 9(18):2267–2273

    Google Scholar 

  26. Diamantoulakis PD, Pappi KN, Karagiannidis GK, Xing H, Nallanathan A (2017) Joint downlink/uplink design for wireless powered networks with interference. IEEE Access 5:1534–1547

    Google Scholar 

  27. Higuchi K, Benjebbour A (2015) Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) with successive interference cancellation for future radio access. IEICE Trans Commun E98-B(3):403–414

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ding Z, Peng M, Poor HV (2015) Cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access in 5G systems. IEEE Commun Lett 19(8):1462–1465

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Ding Z, Elkashlan M, Poor HV (2016) Cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access with simultaneous wireless information and power transfer. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 34(4):938–953

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen Z, Ding Z, Dai X, Zhang R (2016) A mathematical proof of the superiority of NOMA compared to conventional OMA. IEEE Trans Signal Process 65(19):5191–5202

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Zeng M, Yadav A, Dobre OA, Tsiropoulos GI, Poor HV (2017) On the sum rate of MIMO-NOMA and MIMO-OMA systems. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett 6(4):534–537

    Google Scholar 

  32. Saito Y, Kishiyama Y, Benjebbour A, Nakamura T, Li A, Higuchi K (2014) Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) for cellular future radio access. In: Proc IEEE Veh Technology Conf, pp 1–5

  33. Fan L, Yang N, Duong TQ, Elkashlan M, Karagiannidis GK (2016) Exploiting direct links for physical layer security in multiuser multirelay networks. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 15(6):3856–3867

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xiaomei Y, Ke M (2016) Evolution of wireless sensor network security. In: Proc IEEE World Automat Congr, pp 1–5

  35. Perrig A (2002) SPINS: security Protocols for sensor networks. ACM Wireless Networks 8(5):521–534

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Chan H, Perrig A, Song D (2003) Random key predistribution schemes for sensor networks. In: Proc IEEE Symp Security and Privacy, May 2003, pp 197–213

  37. Liu D, Ning P, Li R (2005) Establishing pairwise keys in distributed sensor networks. ACM Trans Info and System Security 8(1):41–77

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhu J, Zou Y, Zheng B (2016) Physical-layer security and reliability challenges for industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 5:5313–5320

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ha D-B, Tran D-D, Truong T-V, Vo N-V (2016) Physical layer secrecy performance of energy harvesting networks with power transfer station selection. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf Commun Electron, pp 451–456

  40. Qian M, Liu C, Zou Y (2016) Cooperative beamforming for physical layer security in power-constrained wireless sensor networks with partial relay selection. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 12(3):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hyadi A, Rezki Z, Alouini M (2016) An overview of physical layer security in wireless communication systems with csit uncertainty. IEEE Access 4:6121–6132

    Google Scholar 

  42. Choi J, Ha J, Jeon H (2013) Physical layer security for wireless sensor networks. In: Proc IEEE Int Symp on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Comm, pp 1–6

  43. Zou Y, Wang G (2016) Intercept behavior analysis of industrial wireless sensor networks in the presence of eavesdropping attack. IEEE Trans Ind Informat 12(2):780–787

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jameel F, Wyne S, Krikidis I (2017) Secrecy outage for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun Lett 21(7):1565–1568

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tran H, Akerberg J, Bjorkman M, Tran H-V (2017) RF energy harvesting: an analysis of wireless sensor networks for reliable communication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1546-6

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vo VN, Nguyen TG, So-In C, Ha D-B (2017) Secrecy performance analysis of energy harvesting wireless sensor networks with a friendly jammer. IEEE Access 5:25196–25206

    Google Scholar 

  47. Diamantoulakis PD, Pappi KN, Ding Z, Karagiannidis GK (2016) Wireless-powered communications with non-orthogonal multiple access. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 15(12):8422– 8436

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ha D-B, Nguyen SQ Outage performance of energy harvesting DF relaying NOMA networks. Mobile Networks and Applicat pp. 1–14, Oct. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0922-x

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang N, Song X, Cheng J, Leung VCM (2014) Enhancing the security of free-space optical communications with secret sharing and key agreement. J Opt Commun Netw 6(12):1072–1081

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wan Y, Li Q, Zhang Q, Qin J (2015) Optimal and suboptimal full-duplex secure beamforming designs for MISO two-way communications. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett 4(5):493–496

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shaikh FK, Zeadally S (2016) Energy harvesting in wireless sensor networks: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:1041–1054

    Google Scholar 

  52. Miridakis NI, Vergados DD (2013) A survey on the successive interference cancellation performance for single-antenna and multiple-antenna OFDM systems. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 15(1):313–335

    Google Scholar 

  53. Naderi MY, Chowdhury KR, Basagni S (2015) Wireless sensor networks with RF energy harvesting: energy models and analysis. In: Proc IEEE Wireless Commun and Networking Conf, pp 1494–1499

  54. Tran H, Quach TX, Tran H, Uhlemann E (2017) Optimal energy harvesting time and transmit power in cognitive radio network under joint constraints of primary users and eavesdroppers. In: Proc Int Symp on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Commun

  55. Kim J-B, Lee I-H (2015) Capacity analysis of cooperative relaying systems using non-orthogonal multiple access. IEEE Commun Lett 19(11):1949–1952

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lu F, Xu M, Cheng L, Wang J, Zhang J, Chang GK (2016) Non-orthogonal multiple access with successive interference cancellation in millimeter-wave radio-over-fiber systems. J Lightwave Technol 34(17):4178–4185

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ding Z, Adachi F, Poor HV (2016) The application of MIMO to non-orthogonal multiple access. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 15(1):537–552

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gradshteyn I, Ryzhik I (2007). In: Jeffrey A, Zwillinger D (eds) Table of integrals, series, and Products. Academic Press , USA

  59. Barros J, Rodrigues MRD (2006) Secrecy capacity of wireless channels. In: Proc IEEE Int Symp Inf Theory, pp 356–360

  60. Vo VN, Nguyen TG, So-In C, Baig ZA, Sanguanpong S (2018) Secrecy outage performance analysis for energy harvesting sensor networks with a jammer using relay selection strategy. IEEE Access 6:23406–23419

    Google Scholar 

  61. Do NT, Costa DB, Duong TQ, Bao VNQ (2017) Exploiting direct links in multiuser multirelay SWIPT cooperative networks with opportunistic scheduling. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 16(8):5410–5427

    Google Scholar 

  62. Toan HV, Bao VNQ, Le HN (2017) Cognitive two-way relay systems with multiple primary receivers: exact and asymptotic outage formulation. IET Commun 11(16):2490–2497

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Khon Kaen University via ASEAN and the GMS Countries’ Personnel programs 2017-2020 and an interdisciplinary grant (CSKKU2560) from the Department of Computer Science, Khon Kaen University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Network Technology (ANT) Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

    Van Nhan Vo & Chakchai So-In

  2. Faculty of Information Technology, Duy Tan University, Danang, Vietnam

    Tri Gia Nguyen

  3. Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden

    Hung Tran

Authors
  1. Van Nhan Vo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tri Gia Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chakchai So-In
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hung Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chakchai So-In.

Appendices

Appendix A: Proof of Lemma 1

Now, we prove Lemma 1 by considering the following integral:

$$ {\Gamma} \left( z \right) = \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} {\frac{{{e^{Cz}}}}{{{{\left( {z + A} \right)}^{2}}\left( {z + D} \right)}}} dz. $$
(78)

Using some simplified transformations, we can rewrite Eq. 78 as follows:

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} {\Gamma} \left( z \right) \!&=&\! \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} {\frac{{\left( {D - A} \right)\left( {z + B} \right) - \left( {z + A} \right)\left( {z + D} \right) + {{\left( {z + A} \right)}^{2}}}}{{{{\left( {z + A} \right)}^{2}}\left( {z + D} \right){{\left( {D - A} \right)}^{2}}}}}\\ &&\times {e^{Cz}}dz\\ &=&{{\Gamma}_{1}}\left( z \right)+{{\Gamma}_{2}}\left( z \right)+{{\Gamma}_{3}}\left( z \right), \end{array} $$
(79)

where \({{\Gamma }_{1}}\left (z \right )\), \({{\Gamma }_{2}}\left (z \right )\), and \({{\Gamma }_{3}}\left (z \right )\) are defined as follows:

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} {{\Gamma}_{1}}\left( z \right) &=& \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} {\frac{{{e^{Cz}}}}{{{{\left( {z + A} \right)}^{2}}\left( {D - A} \right)}}} dz, \end{array} $$
(80)
$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} {{\Gamma}_{2}}\left( z \right) &=& -\int\limits_{0}^{\infty} {\frac{{{e^{Cz}}}}{{\left( {z + A} \right){{\left( {D - A} \right)}^{2}}}}} dz, \end{array} $$
(81)
$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} {{\Gamma}_{3}}\left( z \right) &=& \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} {\frac{{{e^{Cz}}}}{{\left( {z + D} \right){{\left( {D - A} \right)}^{2}}}}} dz. \end{array} $$
(82)

Using (3.352.4) and (3.353.2) in [58] to solve these integrals, \({\Gamma } \left (z \right )\) is obtained as in Eq. 50. The proof is completed.

Appendix B: Proof of Lemma 2

Similar to the approach of Lemma 1, we have

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} {\Omega} \left( z \right) &=& \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} {\frac{{{e^{Cz}}}}{{\left( {z + A} \right)\left( {z + D} \right)}}} dz\\ &=& \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} {\frac{{z + D - \left( {z + A} \right)}}{{\left( {z + A} \right)\left( {z + D} \right)\left( {D - A} \right)}}{e^{Cz}}} dz\\ &=& {{\Omega}_{1}}\left( z \right)+{{\Omega}_{2}}\left( z \right), \end{array} $$
(83)

where \({{\Omega }_{1}}\left (z \right )\) and \({{\Omega }_{2}}\left (z \right )\) are defined as

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} {{\Omega}_{1}}\left( z \right) &=& \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} {\frac{{{e^{Cz}}}}{{\left( {z + A} \right)\left( {D - A} \right)}}} dz, \end{array} $$
(84)
$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} {{\Omega}_{2}}\left( z \right) &=& \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} {\frac{{{e^{Cz}}}}{{\left( {z + D} \right)\left( {A - D} \right)}}} dz. \end{array} $$
(85)

Using (3.352.4) and (3.353.2) in [58] to calculate these integrals, the function \({\Omega } \left (z \right )\) can be obtained as in Eq. 54. The proof is completed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vo, V.N., Nguyen, T.G., So-In, C. et al. Outage Performance Analysis of Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks for NOMA Transmissions. Mobile Netw Appl 25, 23–41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1188-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1188-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation