Abstract
This paper presents the outage probability analysis of the energy harvesting (EH) decode and forward (DF) cooperative relay network when more than one relays are available to assist the communication between source and destination in the presence of the direct connection. The relays use power splitting (PS) protocol with adaptive PS ratio for EH. As wireless EH can be more beneficial over smaller distances therefore a clustered environment is considered in which the source, destination and relays are located in a small area. First, we analyze the performance of selection cooperation (SC) which requires channel state information (CSI) at the source. High signal to noise ratio approximation of the outage probability is provided for this case. Secondly, we present the performance of all relays cooperation (ARC) scheme which requires no CSI at the source. Lower and upper bounds of the outage probability are presented for smaller number of relays in ARC scheme whereas high signal to noise ratio approximation is provided for higher number of relays. Simulation results validate the analytical results and show that SC scheme outperforms ARC scheme at the expense of CSI requirement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mepedally B, Mehta NB (2010) Voluntary energy harvesting relays and selection in cooperative wireless networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 9(11):3543–3553
Krikidis I (2015) Relay selection in wireless powered cooperative networks with energy storage. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 33(12):2596–2610
Nasir AA, Zhou X, Durrani S, Kennedy RA (2013) Relaying protocols for wireless energy harvesting and information processing. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 12(7):3622–3636
Ding Z, Perlaza S, Esnaola I, Poor HV (2014) Power allocation strategies in energy harvesting wireless cooperative networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 13(2):846–860
Ding H, da Costa D, Suraweera H, Ge J (2016) Role selection cooperative systems with energy harvesting relays. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 15(6):4218–4233
Varan B, Yener A (2015) Incentivizing signal and energy cooperation in wireless networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 33(12):2524–2566
Wang Z, Chen Z, Xia B, Luo L, Zhou J (2016) Cognitive relay networks with energy harvesting and information transfer: design, analysis and optimization. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 15(4):2562–2576
Bae YH, Baek JW (2016) Achievable throughput analysis of opportunistic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks with energy harvesting. IEEE Trans Commun 64(4):1399–1410
Wu T-Q, Yang H-C (2015) On the performance of overlaid wireless sensor transmission with RF energy harvesting. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 33(8):1693–1705
Liu W, Zhou X, Durrani S, Mehrpouyan H, Blostein D (2016) Energy harvesting wireless sensor networks: Delay analysis considering energy costs of sensing and transmission. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 15(7):4635–4650
Mekikis P-V, Antonopoulos A, Kartsakli E, Lalos A. S., Verikoukis C (2016) Information exchange in randomly deployed dense WSNs with wireless energy harvesting capabilities. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 15(4):3008–3018
Li T, Fan P, Letaief KB (2016) Outage probability of energy harvesting relay-aided cooperative networks over rayleigh fading channel. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65(2):972–978
Son PN, Kong HY (2015) Exact outage analysis of energy harvesting underlay cooperative cognitive networks. IEICE Trans Commun E98-B(4):661–672
Do NT, Bao VNQ, An B (2016) Outage performance analysis of relay selection schemes in wireless energy harvesting cooperative networks over non-identical rayleigh fading channels. Sensors, MDPI:1–19
Lee Y-H, Liu K-H (2015) Battery-aware relay selection for energy harvesting cooperative networks. In: IEEE 26th annual international symposium on personal, indoor, and mobile radio communications (PIMRC), 2015, Hong Kong, pp 1786–1791
Liu KH (2014) Selection cooperation using RF energy harvesting relays with finite energy buffer. In: 2014 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference. WCNC, Istanbul, pp 2156–2161
Liu KH (2016) Performance analysis of relay selection for cooperative relays based on wireless power transfer with finite energy storage. IEEE Trans Veh Tech 65(7):5110–5121
Michalopoulos DS, Suraweera HA, Schober R (2015) Relay selection for simultaneous information transmission and wireless energy transfer: a tradeoff perspective. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 33(8):1578–1594
Ding Z, Krikidis I, Sharif B, Poor HV (2014) Wireless information and power transfer in cooperative networks with spatially random relays. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 13(8):4440–4453
Luo Y, Zhang J, Letaief KB (2013) Relay selection for energy harvesting cooperative communication systems. In: 2013 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM), Atlanta, GA, pp 2514–2519
Xiao Y, Han Z, DaSilva LA (2014) Opportunistic relay selection for cooperative energy harvesting communication networks. In: 2014 IEEE global communications conference, Austin, TX, pp 4371–4376
Krikidis I, Thompson JS, Mclaughlin S, Goertz N (2009) Max-min relay selection for legacy amplify-and-forward systems with interference. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 8(6):3016– 3027
Uysal M (2009) Cooperative Communications for Improved Wireless Network Transmission: Frameworks for Virtual Antenna Array Applications. IGI-Global
Beaulieu NC, Hu J (2006) A closed-form expression for the outage probability of decode-and-forward relaying in dissimilar rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Commun Lett 10(12):813–815
Ikki SS, Ahmed MH (2011) Performance analysis of cooperative diversity with incremental-best-relay technique over rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Trans Commun 59(8):2152–2161
Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (2000) Table of integrals, series and products, 6th edn. Academic Press
Ng EW, Geller M (1969) A table of integrals of the error functions. J Res National Bureau of Standards-B Mathematical Sciences 73B(1):1–20
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (B0126-16-1051) and National Research Foundation (NRF) Korea under grant number NRF-2015R1D1A1A09059026.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Lemma 1
We know the cdf of individual g i ’s and since they are independent therefore we can write the outage probability for SC scheme as
After some mathematical manipulations, the above integral can be written as
For high SNR, we use following approximations
Hence Eq. 37 can be simplified to
we can use binomial expansion to get
the result of the inner integration can be written as
□
By putting Eq. 43 into Eq. 42 Lemma 2 is proved.
Proof of Lemma 2
The pdf of g can be found using Eq. 18
and \(\overline {g}\) and \({\sigma _{g}^{2}}\) are given by
Now we can use following identity from [26]
where W α,β (x) is the Whittaker function. Putting Eq. 44 into Eqs. 45, 46 and using Eq. 47 we can get Eqs. 34 and 35. Now we can write the right hand side of Eq. 27 as follows
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ashraf, M., Jang, J.W. & Lee, KG. Outage Probability Analysis for Energy Harvesting Cooperative Relays in a Clustered Environment. Mobile Netw Appl 23, 1208–1219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0813-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0813-1