An Ontology-Based Approach to Metaphor Cognitive Computation

• Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91–130.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., & Patel-Schneider, P. (2003). The description logic handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Boden, M. A. (2003). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Chen, K. J., Shu-Ling, H., Yueh-Yin, S., & Yi-Jun, C. (2005). Extended-hownet: A representational framework for concepts. In OntoLex 2005—ontologies and lexical resources IJCNLP-05 workshop, Jeju Island, South Korea.

• Dong, Z. D., & Dong, Q. (2006). Hownet and the computation of meaning. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. London: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gomez-Perez, A., & Corcho, O. (2002). Ontology languages for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(4), 54–60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1997). Blending and metaphor. In W. G. Raymond, & J. S. Gerard (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Gruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition, 5, 199–220.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Guarino, N. (1998). Formal ontology and information systems. In Proceedings of 1st International conference on formal ontology in information systems (FOIS’98) (pp. 3–5). Trento, Italy: The IOS Press.

• Huang, X. X. (2009). Research on some key issues of metaphor computation. PhD thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (in Chinese).

• Huang, X. X., & Zhou, C. L. (2005). A logical approach for metaphor understanding. In Proceedings of 2005 IEEE International conference on natural language processing and knowledge engineering (pp. 268–271). Wuhan, China: IEEE Computer Society.

• Huang, X. X., & Zhou C. L. (2007). An owl-based wordnet lexical ontology. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science A), 8(6), 864–870.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Huang, X. X., Huang, H. X., Xu, C. H., Chen, W., & Wang, R. B. (2011). A novel a novel pattern matching method for chinese metaphor identification and classification. In Proceedings of the 2011 International conference on artificial intelligence and computational intelligence (AICI’11) (pp. 104–114). Taiyuan, China: Springer.

• Johnson, M. (1989). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kittay, E. F. (1987). Metaphor, its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books.

  Google Scholar 

• Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Maedche, A., & Volz, R. (2001). The ontology extraction and maintenance framework text-to-onto. In Proceedings of the ICDM’ 01 workshop on integrating data mining and knowledge management, California, USA (pp. 1–12).

• Mason, Z. J. (2004). Cormet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics, 30(1), 23–44.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miller, G. A. (1993). Images and models, similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, metaphor and thought (pp. 357–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1989). The meaning of meaning. New York: Mariner Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Pereira, F. C. (2007). Creativity and artificial intelligence: A conceptual blending approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  Google Scholar 

• Shutova, E. (2010). Models of metaphor in nlp. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden (pp. 688–697).

• Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation: Logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Steinhart, E. C. (2001). The logic of metaphor: Analogous parts of possible worlds. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Veale, T. (1995). Metaphor, memory and meaning: Symbolic and connectionist issues in metaphor interpretation. PhD thesis, Trinity College, Dublin.

• Yang, Y., Zhou, C. L., Ding, X. J., Chen, J. W., & Shi, X. D. (2009). Metaphor recognition: Chmeta, a pattern-based system. Computational Intelligence, 25(4), 265–301. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2009.00349.x.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Zhou, C. L. (2003). Introduction to mind computation. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhou, C. L., Yang, Y., & Huang, X. X. (2007). Computational mechanisms for metaphor in languages: A survey. Journal Computer Science and Technology, 22(2), 308–319.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references