Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new landscape index for quantifying urban expansion using multi-temporal remotely sensed data

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape metrics or indices have been commonly used for quantifying landscape patterns. However, most of these indices are generally focused on simple analysis and description of the characterization of the geometric and spatial properties of categorical map patterns. These indices can hardly obtain the information about the spatio-temporal dynamic changes of landscape patterns, especially when multi-temporal remote sensing data are used. In this paper, a new landscape index, i.e., landscape expansion index (LEI), is proposed to solve such problems. In contrast with conventional landscape indices which are capable of reflecting the spatial characteristics for only one single time point, LEI and its variants can capture the information of the formation processes of a landscape pattern. This allows one to quantify the dynamic changes in two or more time points. These proposed indices have been applied to the measurement of the urban expansion of Dongguan in Guangdong province, China, for the period of 1988–2006. The analysis identifies three urban growth types, i.e., infilling, edge-expansion and outlying. A further analysis of different values of LEI in each period reveals a general temporal transition between phases of diffusion and coalescence in urban growth. This implies that the regularity in the spatiotemporal pattern of urban development in Dongguan, is consistent with the explanations according to urban development theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti M, Waddell P (2000) An integrated urban development and ecological simulation model. Integr Assess 1:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld H (1954) The tidal wave of metropolitan expansion. J Am Inst Plan 20:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce RR (1966) The edge of the metropolis: the wave theory analog approach. Brit Columbia Geograp Ser 7:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Cissel JH, Swanson FJ, Weisberg PJ (1999) Landscape management using historical fire regimes: Blue River Oregon. Ecol Appl 9:1217–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressy PF (1939) Population succession in Chicago, 1898–1930. Am J Soc 44:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csillag F, Kabos S (2002) Wavelets, boundaries and the analysis of landscape pattern. Ecoscience 9:177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel C, Oguz H, Hemphill JJ, Clarke KC, Gazulis N (2005) Diffusion and coalescence of the Houston metropolitan area: evidence supporting a new urban theory. Environ Plan B 32(2):231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan B, Sabagh G, Van Arsdol MD (1962) Patterns of city growth. Am J Soc 67:418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellman T (1997) Infill: the cure for sprawl? Arizona issue analysis, 146. The Goldwater Institute, Phoenix, p 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu BJ, Chen LD (2001) Agricultural landscape spatial pattern analysis in the semi-arid hill area of the Loess Plateau, China. J Arid Environ 44(3):291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RH, O’Neill RV, Turner MG (1993) Ecological implications of landscape fragmentation. In: Pickett STA, McDonnell MJ (eds) Humans as components of ecosystems: subtle human effects and the ecology of populated areas. Springer, New York, pp 208–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold M, Clarke KC, Scepan J (2002) Remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land use. Environ Plan A 34:1443–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold M, Goldstein NC, Clarke KC (2003) The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sens Environ 86:286–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbernon J, Branthomme A (2001) Characterization of landscape pattern of deforestation in tropical rain forests. Intl J Remote Sens 22:1753–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, O’Neill RV, Coleman PR (1987) Landscape pattern in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48:321–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhl JF, Ruggiero LF (1991) Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest and its potential effects on wildlife. In Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests pp 35–46. Tech. coords. by Ruggiero LF, Aubry KB, Carey AB, Huff MH. US For Serv Gen Tech Rep PNW-285. Portland, OR, USA

  • Li X, Yeh A (1998) Principal component analysis of stacked multitemporal images for the monitoring of rapid urban expansion in the Pearl River Delta. Int J Remote Sens 19:1501–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li BL, Loehle C, Malon D (1996) Microbial transport through heterogeneous porous media: random walk, fractal, and percolation approaches. Ecol Model 85:285–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XP, Li X, Liu L, He JQ (2008) A bottom-up approach to discover transition rules of cellular automata using ant intelligence. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(11–12):1247–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck M, Wu J (2002) A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region of USA. Landscape Ecol 17:327–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsushitaa B, Xu M, Fukushimaa T (2006) Characterizing the changes in landscape structure in the Lake Kasumigaura Basin, Japan using a high-quality GIS dataset. Landscape Urban Plan 9:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-351. Pacific Northwest research Station

  • Newling BE (1969) The spatial variation of urban population densities. Geograp Rev 59:242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, Krummel JR, Gardner RH et al (1988) Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 1:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1997) Mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotnick RE, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (1993) Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landscape Ecol 8:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT et al (1995) A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure indices. Landscape Ecol 10:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder B, Seppelt R (2006) Analysis of pattern–process interactions based on landscape models—Overview, general concepts, and methodological issues. Ecol Model 199:505–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH (eds) (1990) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer, New York, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EH, Hurd J, Civco D, Prisloe MP, Arnold C (2003) Development of a geospatial model to quantify, describe and map urban growth. Remote Sens Environ 86:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsborough HH (1962) City growth and city structure. J Region Sci 4:35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, David J (2002) A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Model 153:7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Liu M, Zhang C, An S, Yu W, Chen JM (2007) The spatiotemporal dynamics of rapid urban growth in the Nanjing metropolitan region of China. Landscape Ecol 22(6):925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh AGO, Li X (1997) An integrated remote sensing—GIS approach in the monitoring and evaluation of rapid urban growth for sustainable development in the Pearl River Delta, China. Int Plan Studies 2:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SQ, Zhang J, Li F, Cropp R (2006) Vector analysis theory on landscape pattern (VATLP). Ecol Model 193(3–4):492–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was in part supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 40901187), the Key National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 40830532), the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 9451027501002471) and the Research Fund of LREIS, CAS (Grant No.4106298).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoping Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Li, X., Chen, Y. et al. A new landscape index for quantifying urban expansion using multi-temporal remotely sensed data. Landscape Ecol 25, 671–682 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9454-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9454-5

Keywords

Navigation