Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mobile Technology for Improved Contraceptive Care in Morocco

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fulfillment of unmet needs for contraception can help women reach their reproductive goals. Therefore, there is a growing concern worldwide about contraception and women’s knowledge of making an advised choice about it. In this aspect, an outgrown number of apps are now available providing information concerning contraception whether it concerns natural contraception or modern contraception. However, vast amounts of these apps contain inaccurate sexual health facts and non-evidence-based information concerning contraception. On these bases, and in respect to: (1) the needs of women to effectively prevent unintended pregnancies while conducting a stress-free healthy lifestyle. (2) the World Health Organization (WHO) Medical Eligibility Criteria (MEC) for contraception’s recommendations, and (3) the results/recommendations of a field study conducted in the reproductive health center ‘Les Orangers’ in Rabat to collect the app’s requirements, we developed an evidence-based patient-centered contraceptive app referred to as ‘MyContraception’. Thereafter, we conducted a set of functional tests to ensure that the MyContraception solution is performing as expected and is conform to the software functional requirements previously set before moving to non-functional requirements evaluation. Since customer’s feedback is valuable to non-functional testing, we choose to evaluate potential users’ feedback. Moreover, giving that mobile app testing is a complex process involving different skill sets, we elaborated a rigorous experimental design to conduct an empirical evaluation of the MyContraception solution, which will exhaustively assess the overall quality of this solution and examine its effects on improving the quality of patient-centered contraception care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. According to the WHO, women of reproductive age refers to all women aged 15–49 years.

  2. According to the CDC, both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the North American Menopause Society recommend that women continue contraceptive use until menopause or age 50–55 years.

References

  1. J. Guillebaud, Contraception today, 9th Editio. CRC Press, 2019.

  2. R. A. Bonnema, M. C. McNamara, and A. L. Spencer, “Contraception choices in women with underlying medical conditions,” Am. Fam. Physician, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 621–628, 2010.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Moffat, G. Sartorius, A. Raggi, R. Draths, and J. Bitzer, “Consultation de contraception basée sur l’évidence,” Forum Médical Suisse – Swiss Med. Forum, 2019.

  4. World Health Organization, “WHO | Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008,” Who, 2014.

  5. E. A. Kassahun et al., “Factors associated with unintended pregnancy among women attending antenatal care in Maichew Town, Northern Ethiopia, 2017,” BMC Res. Notes, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. L. MD, “Pharmacovigilance in Pregnancy,” in Pharmacovigilance: A Practical Approach, 1st Editio., T. D. C. R. F. L. M. B. L. Scarazzini, Ed. Elsevier, 2019, p. 228.

  7. M. W. Arbour and M. A. Stec, “Mobile Applications for Women’s Health and Midwifery Care: A Pocket Reference for the 21st Century,” J. Midwifery Women’s Heal., 2018.

  8. A. Mendes, “What’s new in the world of prescribing contraception?,” Nurse Prescr., vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 410–411, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Rousseau, S. M. Da Silva Godineau, C. De Casabianca, C. Begue, C. Tessier-Cazeneuve, and G. Legendre, “State of knowledge on smartphone applications concerning contraception: A systematic review,” J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 83–89, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Kharbouch, A. Idri, T. Rachad, H. Alami, L. Redman, and Y. Stelate, “MyContraception: An Evidence-Based Contraception mPHR for Better Contraceptive Fit,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2020, pp. 86–94.

  11. E. Berglund Scherwitzl, O. Lundberg, H. Kopp Kallner, K. Gemzell Danielsson, J. Trussell, and R. Scherwitzl, “Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app,” Contraception, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 420–425, 2017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Berglund Scherwitzl, K. Gemzell Danielsson, J. A. Sellberg, and R. Scherwitzl, “Fertility awareness-based mobile application for contraception,” Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Heal. Care, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 234–241, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Malarcher, J. Spieler, M. S. Fabic, S. Jordan, E. H. Starbird, and C. Kenon, “Fertility awareness methods: Distinctive modern contraceptives,” Global Health Science and Practice, vol. 4, no. 1. pp. 13–15, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Hubacher and J. Trussell, “A definition of modern contraceptive methods,” Contraception, vol. 92, no. 5. pp. 420–421, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Chor, K. Rankin, B. Harwood, and A. Handler, “Unintended pregnancy and postpartum contraceptive use in women with and without chronic medical disease who experienced a live birth,” Contraception, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. M. Curtis et al., “U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016,” MMWR Recomm. Reports, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1–104, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. WHO, Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 5th Editio. 2015.

  18. S. S. T. Ashok Sivaji, Norfarhana Abdollah, “Measuring Public Value UX based on ISO / IEC 25010 Quality Attributes,” User Sci. Eng. (i-USEr), 2014 3rd Int. Conf., pp. 56–61, 2014.

  19. Z. Zahidi, Y. P. Lim, and P. C. Woods, “Understanding the user experience (UX) factors that influence user satisfaction in digital culture heritage online collections for non-expert users,” in Proceedings of 2014 Science and Information Conference, SAI 2014, 2014, pp. 57–63.

  20. E. Von Zezschwitz et al., Human Computer Interaction in the Internet of Things Era - An overview of current trends, developments, and research in human-computer interaction. 2015.

  21. M. Bachiri, A. Idri, J. L. Fernández-Alemán, and A. Toval, “Evaluating the Privacy Policies of Mobile Personal Health Records for Pregnancy Monitoring,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 42, no. 8, 2018.

  22. J. L. Fernández-Alemán, I. C. Señor, P. Á. O. Lozoya, and A. Toval, “Security and privacy in electronic health records: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 46, no. 3. pp. 541–562, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. B. C. Zapata, A. H. Niñirola, J. L. Fernández-Alemán, and A. Toval, “Assessing the privacy policies in mobile personal health records,” in 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2014, 2014, pp. 4956–4959.

  24. World Health Organization, “Family planning/Contraception,” Family planning/Contraception. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception.

  25. D. J. Hooper, “Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: A global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey,” Clin. Drug Investig., vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 749–763, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. L. Leeman, “Medical Barriers to Effective Contraception,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 34, no. 1. pp. 19–29, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Ouhbi, J. L. Fernández-Alemán, J. M. Carrillo-de-Gea, A. Toval, and A. Idri, “E-health internationalization requirements for audit purposes,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 144, pp. 49–60, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. L. Fernández-Alemán, C. L. Seva-Llor, A. Toval, S. Ouhbi, and L. Fernández-Luque, “Free web-based personal health records: An analysis of functionality,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 37, no. 6, 2013.

  29. International Organization For Standardization Iso, “Iso/Iec 25010:2011,” Softw. Process Improv. Pract., p. 34, 2011.

  30. L. Ouhbi, S., Idri, A., Fern, “,” 8th Int. Conf. Heal. Informatics, pp. 405–412, 2015.

  31. A. Idri, Bachiri, M., Fernández-alemán, J.L. Toval, “ISO/ IEC 25010 based evaluation of free mobile personal health records for pregnancy monitoring,” IEEE 41st Annu. Comput. Softw. Appl. Conf., pp. 262–267, 2017.

  32. A. Idri, Sardi, L., Fernández-alemán, “Quality evaluation of gamified blood donation apps using ISO/IEC 25010 Standard,” 12th Int. Conf. Heal. Informatics, pp. 607–614, 2018.

  33. WHO, Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 3rd Editio. 2016.

  34. M. Kharbouch, A. Idri, L. Redman, J. L. Alami, Hassan Fernández-Alemán, and A. Toval, “Software Requirement Catalog on Acceptability, Usability, Internationalization and Sustainability for Contraception mPHRs,” in Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020, 2020, pp. 1–12.

  35. ISO, IEC, and IEE, “ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148: systems and software engineering — life cycle processes — requirements engineering,” 2011.

  36. S. Ouhbi, A. Idri, J. L. F. Aleman, and A. Toval, “Evaluating software product quality: a systematic mapping study,” in Proceedings - 2014 Joint Conference of the International Workshop on Software Measurement, IWSM 2014 and the International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, Mensura 2014, 2014, pp. 141–151.

  37. S. Ouhbi, A. Idri, J. L. Fernández-Alemán, A. Toval, and H. Benjelloun, “Applying ISO/IEC 25010 on mobile personal health records,” in HEALTHINF 2015 - 8th International Conference on Health Informatics, Proceedings; Part of 8th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, BIOSTEC 2015, 2015, pp. 405–412.

  38. M. W. Arbour and M. A. Stec, “Mobile Applications for Women’s Health and Midwifery Care: A Pocket Reference for the 21st Century,” J. Midwifery Women’s Heal., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 330–334, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. K. P. Tebb, S. L. Trieu, R. Rico, R. Renteria, F. Rodriguez, and M. Puffer, “A mobile health contraception decision support intervention for Latina adolescents: Implementation evaluation for use in school-based health centers,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 21, no. 3, 2019.

  40. A. Idri, M. Bachiri, and J. L. Fernández-Alemán, “A Framework for Evaluating the Software Product Quality of Pregnancy Monitoring Mobile Personal Health Records,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1–17, Mar. 2016.

  41. L. Sardi, A. Idri, L. M. Readman, H. Alami, R. Bezad, and J. L. Fernández-Alemán, “Mobile health applications for postnatal care: Review and analysis of functionalities and technical features,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 184, pp. 1–26, Feb. 2020.

  42. M. Bachiri, A. Idri, L. M. Redman, J. L. Fernandez-Aleman, and A. Toval, “A requirements catalog of mobile personal health records for prenatal care,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2019, vol. 11622 LNCS, pp. 483–495.

  43. M. Bachiri, A. Idri, A. Abran, L. M. Redman, and J. L. Fernández-Alemán, “Sizing Prenatal mPHRs using COSMIC Measurement Method,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1–11, Oct. 2019.

  44. M. Bachiri, A. Idri, L. Redman, A. Abran, J. M. C. de Gea, and J. L. Fernández-Alemán, “COSMIC functional size measurement of mobile personal health records for pregnancy monitoring,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2019, vol. 932, pp. 24–33.

  45. M. Bachiri, A. Idri, J. L. Fernández-Alemán, and A. Toval, “Evaluating the Privacy Policies of Mobile Personal Health Records for Pregnancy Monitoring,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1–14, Aug. 2018.

  46. A. Idri, M. Bachiri, J. L. Fernández-Alemán, and A. Toval, “Experiment design of free pregnancy monitoring mobile personal health records quality evaluation,” in 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services, Healthcom 2016, 2016, pp. 1–6.

  47. M. Bachiri, A. Idri, J. L. Fernández-Alemán, and A. Toval, “Mobile personal health records for pregnancy monitoring functionalities: Analysis and potential,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 134, pp. 121–135, Oct. 2016.

  48. M. Bachiri, A. Idri, J. L. Fernandez-Aleman, and A. Toval, “A preliminary study on the evaluation of software product quality of pregnancy monitoring mPHRs,” in Proceedi2016ngs of 2015 IEEE World Conference on Complex Systems, WCCS 2015, , pp. 1–6.

  49. J. Tian, Software Quality Engineering: Testing, Quality Assurance, and Quantifiable Improvement. 2005.

  50. © Statista 2018, “Global mobile medical apps market forecast 2025.” .

  51. J. Reyes, Y. Washio, M. Stringer, and A. M. Teitelman, “Usability and acceptability of everhealthier women, a mobile application to enhance informed health choices,” J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs., vol. 47, pp. 853–861, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Idri.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Appendices

Appendix 1

Fig. 1
figure 1

Features & functionalities Detailed Overview

Fig. 2
figure 2

Features & functionalities Summarized Overview

Appendix 2

Fig. 3
figure 3

Launching interface

Fig. 4
figure 4

Sign in interface

Fig. 5
figure 5

Period/ovulation tracking logs (1)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Period/ovulation tracking logs (2)

Fig. 7
figure 7

Main interface

Fig. 8
figure 8

Period/ovulation calendar

Fig. 9
figure 9

Notes/symptoms logs

Fig. 10
figure 10

Medical archive logs

Fig. 11
figure 11

History records

Fig. 12
figure 12

Awareness interface

Fig. 13
figure 13

Eligibility test (1)

Fig. 14
figure 14

Eligibility test (2)

Fig. 15
figure 15

Eligibility test (3)

Fig. 16
figure 16

Selected practice recommendations

Fig. 17
figure 17

Medical appointment logs

Fig. 18
figure 18

Settings interface

Appendix 3

Table 1 Assessment Questionnaire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kharbouch, M., Idri, A., Rachad, T. et al. Mobile Technology for Improved Contraceptive Care in Morocco. J Med Syst 45, 16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01684-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01684-6

Keywords

Navigation