Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toward a Fault Tolerant Architecture for Vital Medical-Based Wearable Computing

  • Mobile Systems
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advancements in computers and electronic technologies have led to the emergence of a new generation of efficient small intelligent systems. The products of such technologies might include Smartphones and wearable devices, which have attracted the attention of medical applications. These products are used less in critical medical applications because of their resource constraint and failure sensitivity. This is due to the fact that without safety considerations, small-integrated hardware will endanger patients’ lives. Therefore, proposing some principals is required to construct wearable systems in healthcare so that the existing concerns are dealt with. Accordingly, this paper proposes an architecture for constructing wearable systems in critical medical applications. The proposed architecture is a three-tier one, supporting data flow from body sensors to cloud. The tiers of this architecture include wearable computers, mobile computing, and mobile cloud computing. One of the features of this architecture is its high possible fault tolerance due to the nature of its components. Moreover, the required protocols are presented to coordinate the components of this architecture. Finally, the reliability of this architecture is assessed by simulating the architecture and its components, and other aspects of the proposed architecture are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gulliver, S. R., Serif, T., and Ghinea, G., Pervasive and standalone computing: the perceptual effects of variable multimedia quality. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 60:640–665, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards, J., Moloney, K. P., Jacko, J. A., and Sainfort, F., Evaluating usability of a commercial electronic health record: a case study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66:718–728, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang, Z., Ng, B.-Y., Kankanhalli, A., and Luen Yip, J. W., Workarounds in the use of IS in healthcare: a case study of an electronic medication administration system. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 70:43–65, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aleksy, M., Rissanen, M. J., Maczey, S., and Dix, M., Wearable computing in industrial service applications. Procedia. Comput. Sci. 5:394–400, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Knight, J. F., and Baber, C., Assessing the physical loading of wearable computers. Appl. Ergon. 38:237–47, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bajalan, V., Mohammadi, F. A., and Fathi, A., Fault tolerance in wearable computing based on healthcare: a survey. In Review, 2015.

  7. Changhong, W., Qiang, W., and Shunzhong, S., A distributed wireless body area network for medical supervision. In Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2012 I.E. International. 2612–2616, 2012.

  8. Kim, Y., Lee, W., Raghunathan, A., Raghunathan, V., and Jha, N. K., Chapter 8 - Reliability and security of implantable and wearable medical devices. In: Bhunia, S., Majerus, S. J. A., and Sawan, M. (Eds.), Implantable Biomedical Microsystems. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford, pp. 167–199, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matzeu, G., Florea, L., and Diamond, D., Advances in wearable chemical sensor design for monitoring biological fluids. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 211:403–418, 2015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Park, J. W., and Jang, J., Fabrication of graphene/free-standing nanofibrillar PEDOT/P(VDF-HFP) hybrid device for wearable and sensitive electronic skin application. Carbon 87:275–281, 2015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, N., and Rau, P.-L. P., The acceptance of personal health devices among patients with chronic conditions. Int. J. Med. Inform. 84:288–297, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seo, C., Malek, S., Edwards, G., Popescu, D., Medvidovic, N., Petrus, B., et al., Exploring the role of software architecture in dynamic and fault tolerant pervasive systems, presented at the Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering for Pervasive Computing Applications, Systems, and Environments, 2007.

  13. Mahapatro, A., Khilar, P. M., Fault diagnosis in body sensor networks. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. Ind. Manag. Appl. 5, 2012.

  14. Fragopoulos, A., Gialelis, J., and Serpanos, D., Security framework for pervasive healthcare architectures utilizing MPEG-21 IPMP components. Int. J. Telemed. Appl. 2009, 2008.

  15. Aziz, O., Atallah, L., Lo, B., ElHelw, M., Wang, L., Yang, G.-Z., et al., A pervasive body sensor network for measuring postoperative recovery at home. Surg. Innov. 14:83–90, 2007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Milenković, A., Otto, C., and Jovanov, E., Wireless sensor networks for personal health monitoring: issues and an implementation. Comput. Commun. 29:2521–2533, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu, G., Ren, J., Xia, F., and Xu, Z., An adaptive fault-tolerant communication scheme for body sensor networks. Sensors (Basel) 10:9590–608, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, D.-J., and Prabhakaran, B., Motion fault detection and isolation in body sensor networks. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 7:727–745, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Geeta, D., Nalini, N., and Biradar, R. C., Fault tolerance in wireless sensor network using hand-off and dynamic power adjustment approach. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 36:1174–1185, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharifi, R., and Langari, R., Sensor fault diagnosis with a probabilistic decision process. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 34:146–155, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elhadef, M., Boukerche, A., and Elkadiki, H., A distributed fault identification protocol for wireless and mobile ad hoc networks. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 68:321–335, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morello, R., and Capua, C., A measurement system design technique for improving performances and reliability of smart and fault-tolerant biomedical systems. In: Lay-Ekuakille, A., and Mukhopadhyay, S. (Eds.), Wearable and Autonomous Biomedical Devices and Systems for Smart Environment, vol. 75. Springer, Berlin, pp. 207–217, 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Le, Z., Becker, E., Konstantinides, D. G, Ding, C., and Makedon, F., Modeling reliability for wireless sensor node coverage in assistive testbeds, presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Samos, Greece, 2010.

  24. Haibin, C., Chao, P., and Yue, Z., A novel framework of self-adaptive fault-tolerant for pervasive computing. In Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), 2012 Sixth International Conference on, 286–291. 2012.

  25. Ahamed, S. I., and Sharmin, M., A trust-based secure service discovery (TSSD) model for pervasive computing. Comput. Commun. 31:4281–4293, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, Y., Shi, D., Zou, P., and Rao, X., Adaptive fault-tolerance by exposing service request process as first-class object in pervasive computing, in Future Information Technology (FutureTech), 2010 5th International Conference on, 1–5. 2010.

  27. Sharmin, M., Ahmed, S., and Ahamed, S. I., SAFE-RD (secure, adaptive, fault tolerant, and efficient resource discovery) in pervasive computing environments. In Information Technology: Coding and Computing, 2005. ITCC 2005. Int. Conf. 2:271–276, 2005.

  28. Li, P. and Regehr, J., T-check: bug finding for sensor networks, in Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. 174–185. 2010.

  29. Krunic, V., Trumpler, E., and Han, R., NodeMD: diagnosing node-level faults in remote wireless sensor systems. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Mobile systems, applications and services. 43–56. 2007.

  30. Bucur, D., and Kwiatkowska, M., On software verification for sensor nodes. J. Syst. Softw. 84:1693–1707, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fateh, B., and Govindarasu, M., Energy minimization by exploiting data redundancy in real-time wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 11:1715–1731, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sagha, H., del Millán, J. R., and Chavarriaga, R., Detecting and rectifying anomalies in body sensor networks. In Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2011 International Conference on. 162–167. 2011.

  33. Chao, C.-M., and Hsiao, T.-Y., Design of structure-free and energy-balanced data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 37:229–239, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Williams, R., Srikant, J., Stern, E., and Lussier, Y. A., Cascading policies provide fault tolerance for pervasive clinical communications. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2005. PerCom 2005 Workshops. Third IEEE International Conference on. 209–212. 2005.

  35. Yu, W., and Wu, H., Delay/Fault-Tolerant Mobile Sensor Network (DFT-MSN): a new paradigm for pervasive information gathering. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 6:1021–1034, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brettlecker, G., and Schuldt, H., Reliable distributed data stream management in mobile environments. Inf. Syst. 36:618–643, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ghasemzadeh, H., Jain, N., Sgroi, M., and Jafari, R., Communication minimization for in-network processing in body sensor networks: A buffer assignment technique. In Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe. 358–363, 2009.

  38. Dubrova, E., Introduction, in Fault-Tolerant Design, ed: Springer. 1–4, 2013.

  39. Immonen, A., and Pakkala, D., A survey of methods and approaches for reliable dynamic service compositions. SOCA. 1–30, 2014.

  40. Napolitano, A., Carrozza, G., Antunes, N., and Duraes, J., Survey on software faults injection in java applications. In: Cotroneo, D. (Ed.), Innovative Technologies for Dependable OTS-Based Critical Systems. Springer, Milan, pp. 101–114, 2013.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Bordasch, M., and Gohner, P., Fault prevention in industrial automation systems by means of a functional model and a hybrid abnormity identification concept. In Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE. 2845–2850, 2013.

  42. Ahmed, W., and Wu, Y. W., A survey on reliability in distributed systems. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 79:1243–1255, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research (research plan no. 2068) was supported from Razi University of Kermanshah, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fardin Abdali-Mohammadi.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mobile Systems

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdali-Mohammadi, F., Bajalan, V. & Fathi, A. Toward a Fault Tolerant Architecture for Vital Medical-Based Wearable Computing. J Med Syst 39, 149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0347-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0347-7

Keywords

Navigation