Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Fast and accurate methods for predicting short-range constraints in protein models

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protein modeling tools utilize many kinds of structural information that may be predicted from amino acid sequence of a target protein or obtained from experiments. Such data provide geometrical constraints in a modeling process. The main aim is to generate the best possible consensus structure. The quality of models strictly depends on the imposed conditions. In this work we present an algorithm, which predicts short-range distances between Cα atoms as well as a set of short structural fragments that possibly share structural similarity with a query sequence. The only input of the method is a query sequence profile. The algorithm searches for short protein fragments with high sequence similarity. As a result a statistics of distances observed in the similar fragments is returned. The method can be used also as a scoring function or a short-range knowledge-based potential based on the computed statistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plewczynska D, Kolinski A (2005) Macromol Theory Simul 14:444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tramontano A (2003) Comp Funct Genomics 4:402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pieper U, Eswar N, Braberg H, Madhusudhan MS, Davis FP, Stuart AC, Mirkovic N, Rossi A, Marti-Renom MA, Fiser A, Webb B, Greenblatt D, Huang CC, Ferrin TE, Sali A (2004) Nucleic Acids Res 32:D217

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kopp J, Schwede T (2004) Nucleic Acids Res 32:D230

  5. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sanchez R, Melo F, Sali A (2000) Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29:291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goebel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A (1994) Proteins 18:309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Punta M, Rost B (2005) Bioinformatics 21:2960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuff JA, Clamp ME, Siddiqui AS, Finlay M, Barton GJ (1998) Bioinformatics 14:892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones DT (1999) J Mol Biol 292:195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rost B (2001) J Struct Biol 134:204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de Brevern AG, Etchebest C, Hazout S (2000) Proteins 41:271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fetrow JS, Palumbo MJ, Berg G (1997) Proteins 27:249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bystroff C, Baker D (1998) J Mol Biol 281:565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D (2004) Methods Enzymol 383:66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gront D, Kolinski A (2005) Bioinformatics 21:981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gront D, Kolinski A (2006) Bioinformatics 22:621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gront D, Kolinski A (2008) Bioinformatics 24:584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gribskov M, McLachlan AD, Eisenberg D (1987) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:4355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sadreyev R, Grishin N (2003) J Mol Biol 326:317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohlson T, Wallner B, Elofsson A (2004) Proteins 57:188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prlic A, Domingues FS, Sippl MJ (2000) Protein Eng 13:545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kolinski A (2004) Acta Biochim Pol 51:349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dragalin V, Fedorov V, Patterson S, Jones B (2003) Stat Med 22:913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Davis JV, Dhillon I (2006) Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 19:89

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kmiecik S, Kurcinski M, Rutkowska A, Gront D, Kolinski A (2005) Acta Biochim Pol 53:131

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang G, Dunbrack RLJ (2003) Bioinformatics 19:1589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Biopolymers 22:2577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bradley P, Malmstrom L, Qian B, Schonbrun J, Chivian D, Kim DEE, Meiler J, Misura KMSM, Baker D (2005) Proteins 61:124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kolinski A, Bujnicki JM (2005) Proteins 61:84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Moult J, Fidelis K, Rost B, Hubbard T, Tramontano A (2005) Proteins 61:3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported from NIH grant 1R01GM081680-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Gront.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gront, D., Kolinski, A. Fast and accurate methods for predicting short-range constraints in protein models. J Comput Aided Mol Des 22, 783–788 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9213-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9213-8

Keywords

Navigation