Abstract
This model study investigates the validity of methods used to interpret linear (laminar) multielectrode recordings. In computer experiments extracellular potentials from a synaptically activated population of about 1,000 pyramidal neurons are calculated using biologically realistic compartmental neuron models combined with electrostatic forward modeling. The somas of the pyramidal neurons are located in a 0.4 mm high and wide columnar cylinder, mimicking a stimulus-evoked layer-5 population in a neocortical column. Current-source density (CSD) analysis of the low-frequency part (<500 Hz) of the calculated potentials (local field potentials, LFP) based on the ‘inverse’ CSD method is, in contrast to the ‘standard’ CSD method, seen to give excellent estimates of the true underlying CSD. The high-frequency part (>750 Hz) of the potentials (multi-unit activity, MUA) is found to scale approximately as the population firing rate to the power 3/4 and to give excellent estimates of the underlying population firing rate for trial-averaged data. The MUA signal is found to decay much more sharply outside the columnar populations than the LFP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barth, D. S., & Di, S. (1991). Laminar excitability cycles in neocortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 65, 891–898.
Beaulieu, C. (1993). Numerical data on neocortical neurons in adult rat, with special reference to the GABA population. Brain Research, 609, 284–292.
Bedard, C., Kröger, H., & Destexhe, A. (2004). Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space. Biophysical Journal, 86, 1829–1842.
Bedard, C., Kröger, H., & Destexhe, A. (2006). Model of low-pass filtering of local field potentials. Physical Review. E, 73, 051911.
Blomquist, P., Indahl, U. G., Devor, A., Ulbert, I., Einevoll, G. T., & Dale, A. M. (2006). Estimation of cortical microcircuit model from joint thalamic single-unit and cortical laminar-electrode recordings in rat whisker-barrel system. Abstracts—Society for Neuroscience, 53, 23.
Buzsáki, G. (2004). Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 446–451.
Einevoll, G. T., Pettersen, K. H., Devor, A., Ulbert, I., Halgren, E., & Dale, A. M. (2007). Laminar population analysis: Estimating firing rates and evoked synaptic activity from multielectrode recordings in rat barrel cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 2174–2190.
Feldmeyer, D., & Sakmann, B. (2000). Synaptic efficacy and reliability of excitatory connections between the principal neurones of the input (layer 4) and output layer (layer 5) of the neocortex. Journal of Physiology, 525, 31–39.
Gold, C., Henze, D. A., Koch, C., & Buzsáki, G. (2006). On the origin of the extracellular action potential waveform: A modeling study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 3113–3128.
Gold, C., Henze, D. A., & Koch, C. (2007). Using extracellular action potential recordings to constrain compartmental models. Journal of Comparative Neuroscience, 23, 39–58.
Grimenes, S., & Martinsen, Ø. G. (2000). Bioimpedance & bioelectricity. New York: Academic.
Hagen, E. (2006). Modeling of extracellular potentials from activity in cortical neural populations. Master of Technology thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993). Magnetoencephalography theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65, 413–497.
Holt, G. R., & Koch, C. (1999). Electrical interactions via the extracellular potential near cell bodies. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 6, 169–184.
Lewicki, M. S. (1998). A review of methods for spike sorting: The detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 9, R53–R78.
Mainen, Z. F., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1996). Influence of dendritic structure on firing pattern in model neocortical neurons. Nature, 382, 363–366.
Mitzdorf, U. (1985). Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: Investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiological Reviews, 65, 37–100.
Moffitt, M. A., & McIntyre, C. C. (2005). Model-based analysis of cortical recording with silicon microelectrodes. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2240–2250.
Mountcastle, V. (1997). The columnar organization of neocortex. Brain, 120, 701–722.
Nawrot, M., Aertsen, A., & Rotter, S. (1999). Single-trial estimation of neuronal firing rates: From single-neuron spike trains to population activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 94, 81–92.
Nicholson, C., & Freeman, J. A. (1975). Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology, 38, 356–368.
Nunez, P. L., & Srinavasan, R. (2006). Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of EEG. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettersen, K. H. (2007). Electric potentials of the brain and the underlying neural activity. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Pettersen, K. H., Devor, A., Ulbert, I., Dale, A. M., & Einevoll, G. T. (2006). Current-source density estimation based on inversion of electrostatic forward solution: Effects of finite extent of neuronal activity and conduc tivity discontinuities. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 154, 116–133.
Rappelsberger, P., Pockberger, H., & Petsche, H. (1981). Current source density analysis: Methods and applications to simultaneously recorded field potentials of the rabbit’s visual cortex. Pflügers Archiv, 389, 159–170.
Schroeder, C. E., Lindsley, R. W., Specht, C., Marcovici, A., Smiley, J. F., & Javitt, D. C. (2001). Somatosensory input to auditory association cortex in the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 1322–1327.
Somogyvári, Z., Zalányi, L., Ulbert, I., & Érdi, P. (2005). Model-based source localization of exrtacellular action potentials. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 147, 126–137.
Ulbert, I., Halgren, E., Heit, G., & Karmos, G. (2001). Multi ple microelectrode-recording system for human intra cortical applications. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 106, 69–79.
Vaknin, G., DiScenna, P. G., & Teyler, T. J. (1988). A method for calculating current source density (CSD) analysis without resorting to recording sites outside the sampling volume. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 24, 131–135.
Wilent, W. B., & Contreras, D. (2004). Synaptic responses to whisker deflections in rat barrel cortex as a function of cortical layer. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 3985–3998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Action Editor: Alain Destexhe
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pettersen, K.H., Hagen, E. & Einevoll, G.T. Estimation of population firing rates and current source densities from laminar electrode recordings. J Comput Neurosci 24, 291–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-007-0056-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-007-0056-4