Manner of articulation based Bengali phoneme classification

• Ali, A. A., Van Der Speigel, J., & Mueller, P. (2000). Auditory-based speech processing based on the average localized synchrony detection. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing ICASSP’00 (Vol. 3, pp. 1623–1626). IEEE.

• Ali, A. A., Van der Spiegel, J., & Mueller, P. (1998). An acoustic-phonetic featurebased system for the automatic recognition of fricative consonants. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Vol. 2, pp. 961–964). IEEE.

• Ali, A. A., Van der Spiegel, J., Mueller, P., Haentjens, G., & Berman, J. (1999). An acoustic-phonetic feature-based system for automatic phoneme recognition in continuous speech. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Vol. 3, pp. 118–121). IEEE.

• Ali, A. M. A., Van der Spiegel, J., & Mueller, P. (2001). Acoustic-phonetic features for the automatic classification of fricatives. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(5), 2217–2235.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ali, A. M. A., Van der Spiegel, J., & Mueller, P. (2002). Robust auditory-based speech processing using the average localized synchrony detection. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(5), 279–292.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bengio, Y. (2009). Learning deep architectures for AI. Foundations and trends® in Machine Learning, 2(1), 1–127.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Bhattacharya, K. (1988). Bengali phonetic reader (Vol. 28). Mysuru: Central Institute of Indian Languages.

  Google Scholar 

• Bhowmik, T. (2017). Prosodic and phonological feature based speech recognition system for Bengali (Doctoral dissertation, IIT Kharagpur).

• Bitar, N., & Espy-Wilson, C. Y. (1995a). A signal representation of speech based on phonetic features. In Proceedings of 5th Annual Dual Use Technologies and Applications Conference (pp. 310–315).

• Bitar, N. N., & Espy-Wilson, C. Y. (1995b). Speech parameterization based on phonetic features: Application to speech recognition. In Fourth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 1411–1414).

• Bitar, N. N., Espy-Wilson, C. Y. (1996). A knowledge-based signal representation for speech recognition. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Processing (pp. 29–32). IEEE.

• Chatterji, S. (1926). The origin and development of the Bengali language. Calcutta: Calcutta University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dahl, G. E., Yu, D., Deng, L., & Acero, A. (2011). Large vocabulary continuous speech recognition with context dependent dbn-hmms. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech And Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 4688–4691). IEEE.

• Das Mandal, S. (2007). Role of shape parameters in speech recognition: A study on standard colloquial Bengali (SCB). PhD thesis.

• Davis, S., & Mermelstein, P. (1980). Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 28(4), 357–366.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dekel, O., Keshet, J., & Singer, Y. (2004). An online algorithm for hierarchical phoneme classification. In International Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction (pp. 146–158). Berlin: Springer.

• Deng, L., Abdel-Hamid, O., & Yu, D. (2013). A deep convolutional neural network using heterogeneous pooling for trading acoustic invariance with phonetic confusion. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (pp. 6669–6673). IEEE.

• Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2013). Deep learning for signal and information processing. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research Monograph.

  Google Scholar 

• Dusan, S. (2005). Estimation of speaker’s height and vocal tract length from speech signal. In Ninth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology.

• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1997). Improvements on cross-validation: The 632 + bootstrap method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(438), 548–560.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to roc analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861–874.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Feng, X., Zhang, Y., & Glass, J. (2014). Speech feature denoising and dereverberation via deep autoencoders for noisy reverberant speech recognition. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 1759–1763). IEEE.

• Frankel, J., & King, S. (2005). A hybrid ann/dbn approach to articulatory feature recognition. In Proceedings of Eurospeech. Lisbon: CD-ROM.

• Garofolo, J., Consortium, L. D., et al. (1993). TIMIT: Acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Glorot, X., & Bengio, Y. (2010). Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (Vol. 9, pp. 249–256).

• Goldberg, H., & Reddy, D. (1976). Feature extraction segmentation and labeling in the harpy and hearsay-ii systems. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60(S1), S11–S11.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Graves, A., & Schmidhuber, J. (2005). Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional lstm and other neural network architectures. Neural Networks, 18(5), 602–610.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harrington, J. (1987). Acoustic cues for automatic recognition of English consonants. In Speech Technology: A Survey. (pp. 19–74). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

• Harris, J. (1994). English sound structure. Oxford: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, B., & Lahiri, A. (1991). Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 9(1), 47–96.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., et al. (2012). Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6), 82–97.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hinton, G., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18(7), 1527–1554.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006). Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786), 504–507.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Hou, J. (2009). On the use of frame and segment-based methods for the detection and classification of speech sounds and features. PhD thesis, Rutgers University Graduate School, New Brunswick.

• Huang, X. (1992). Phoneme classification using semicontinuous hidden markov models. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 40(5), 1062–1067.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• King, S., & Taylor, P. (2000). Detection of phonological features in continuous speech using neural networks. Computer Speech & Language, 14(4), 333–353.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• King, S., Taylor, P., Frankel, J., & Richmond, K. (2000). Speech recognition via phonetically featured syllables. University of the Saarland.

• Lahiri, A. (1999). Speech recognition with phonological features. In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 99, pp. 715–718).

• Larochelle, H., Erhan, D., Courville, A., Bergstra, J., & Bengio, Y. (2007). An empirical evaluation of deep architectures on problems with many factors of variation. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine learning (pp. 473–480). ACM.

• Lee, C.-H., Clements, M., Dusan, S., Fosler-Lussier, E., Johnson, K., Juang, B.-H., & Rabiner, L. (2007). An overview on automatic speech attribute transcription (ASAT). In INTERSPEECH (pp. 1825–1828) Antwerp.

• Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (2016). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (Vol. 19). Dallas, TX: SIL International Dallas.

  Google Scholar 

• Mandal, S., Chandra, S., Lata, S., & Datta, A. (2011). Places and manner of articulation of Bangla consonants: An epg based study. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 3149–3152) Florence.

• Mandal, S. D., Saha, A., & Datta, A. (2005). Annotated speech corpora development in Indian languages. Vishwa Bharat, 6, 49–64.

  Google Scholar 

• MATLAB. (2015). MATLAB version 8.5.0.197613 (R2015b). Natick: The Mathworks, Inc..

  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, B. T., Wächter, M., Brand, T., & Kollmeier, B. (2007). Phoneme confusions in human and automatic speech recognition. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 1485–1488).

• Mohamed, A.-R., Dahl, G. E., & Hinton, G. (2012). Acoustic modeling using deep belief networks. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20(1), 14–22.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mohamed, A.-R., Yu, D., & Deng, L. (2010). Investigation of full sequence training of deep belief networks for speech recognition. In INTERSPEECH (Vol. 10, pp. 2846–2849).

• Morales, S. O. C., & Cox, S. J. (2007). Modelling confusion matrices to improve speech recognition accuracy, with an application to dysarthric speech. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 1565–1568).

• Moreau, N., Kim, H.-G., & Sikora, T. (2004). Phonetic confusion based document expansion for spoken document retrieval. In INTERSPEECH.

• Online census data (2016). Retrieved July 20, 2016, from http://censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/ Census_Data_Online/Language/Statement3.htm.

• Palm, R. B. (2012). Prediction as a candidate for learning deep hierarchical models of data. Master’s thesis.

• Reetz, H. (1999). Converting speech signals to phonological features. In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 99, pp. 1733–1736).

• Renals, S., & Rohwer, R. (1989). Phoneme classification experiments using radial basis functions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNNâ˘A´Z89) (Vol. 1, pp. 461–467).

• Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G., & Williams, R. (1986). Learning representations by backpropagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Seide, F., Li, G., & Yu, D. (2011). Conversational speech transcription using context-dependent deep neural networks. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 437–440). Florence.

• Siniscalchi, S., & Lee, C.-H. (2009). A study on integrating acoustic-phonetic information into lattice rescoring for automatic speech recognition. Speech Communication, 51(11), 1139–1153.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Siniscalchi, S., Lyu, D.-C., Svendsen, T., Lee, C.-H. (2012). Experiments on cross-language attribute detection and phone recognition with minimal targetspecific training data. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20(3), 875–887.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Siniscalchi, S., Svendsen, T., & Lee, C.-H. (2007). Towards bottom-up continuous phone recognition. In IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding (ASRU) (pp. 566–569). IEEE.

• Siniscalchi, S., Yu, D., Deng, L., & Lee, C.-H. (2013). Exploiting deep neural networks for detection based speech recognition. Neurocomputing, 106, 148–157.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Siniscalchi, S. M., & Reed, J., Svendsen, T., & Lee, C.-H. (2009). Exploring universal attribute characterization of spoken languages for spoken language recognition. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 168–171). Brighton.

• Siniscalchi, S. M., Svendsen, T., & Lee, C.-H. (2011). A bottom-up stepwise knowledge integration approach to large vocabulary continuous speech recognition using weighted finite state machines. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 901–904). Florence.

• Srinivasan, S., & Petkovic, D. (2000). Phonetic confusion matrix based spoken document retrieval. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 81–87). ACM.

• Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., & Manzagol, P.-A. (2008). Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1096–1103). ACM.

• Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Lajoie, I., Bengio, Y., Manzagol, P. A. (2010). Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 3371–3408.

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Xu, D., Wang, Y., & Metze, F. (2014). EM-based phoneme confusion matrix generation for low-resource spoken term detection. IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) (pp. 424–429). IEEE.

• Yu, D., & Deng, L. (2014). Automatic speech recognition: A deep learning approach. London: Springer.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Yu, D., Deng, L., & Dahl, G. (2010). Roles of pre-training and fine tuning in context dependent dbn-hmms for real world speech recognition. In Proceedings of NIPS Workshop on Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning.

• Yu, D., Siniscalchi, S., Deng, L., & Lee, C.-H. (2012). Boosting attribute and phone estimation accuracies with deep neural networks for detection based speech recognition. In ICASSP (pp. 4169–4172). IEEE.

• Žgank, A., Horvat, B., & Kačič Z. (2005). Data driven generation of phonetic broad classes, based on phoneme confusion matrix similarity. Speech Communication, 47(3), 379–393.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, P., Shao, J., Han, J., Liu, Z., & Yan, Y. (2006). Keyword spotting based on phoneme confusion matrix. Proceedings of ICSLP (Vol. 2, pp. 408–419).

Download references