Power distance and verbal index in Kazakh business discourse

• Anderson, J. A. (1988). Cognitive styles and multicultural populations. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 2–9.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Basabe, N., & Ros, M. (2005). Cultural dimensions and social behavior correlates: Individualism–Collectivism and power distance. International Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 189–225.

  Google Scholar 

• Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196–213.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bochner, S., & Hesketh, B. (1994). Power distance, individualism/collectivism, and job-related attitudes in a culturally diverse work group. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(2), 233–257.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M., Francesco, A., Chen, Z., & Shapiro, D. (2001). Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4), 300–315.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Daller, H., & Yildiz, C. (2006). Power distance at work: The cases of Turkey, successor states of the former Soviet Union and Western Europe. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2(1), 35–53.

  Google Scholar 

• Davidson, W. H. (1980). The location of foreign direct investment activity: Country characteristics and experience effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(2), 9–22.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eslamirasekh, Z. (1993). A cross-cultural comparison of requestive speech act realization patterns in Persian and American English.

• Eylon, D., & Au, K. (1999). Exploring empowerment cross-cultural differences along the power distance dimension. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(3), 373–385.

• Farh, J., Hackett, R., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715–729.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hofstede, G. (1980). Cross-cultural research. In Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

  Google Scholar 

• Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The Taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

  Google Scholar 

• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Iwasaki, I., & Suganuma, K. (2013). A gravity model of Russian trade: The role of foreign direct investment and socio-cultural similarity (p. 40). Tokyo: Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.

  Google Scholar 

• Kapitonov, I. A., Korolev, V. G., Shadrin, A. A., & Shulus, A. A. (2017). The role of small and medium-sized innovative enterprises in the solution of the import substitution task in oil and gas-sector segment of the Russian fuel and energy complex. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(3), 137–145.

  Google Scholar 

• Karibayeva, B., & Kunanbayeva, S. (2015). Kazakh business discourse: Peculiarities of Kazakh business meetings. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 1455–1462.

  Google Scholar 

• Karibayeva, B., & Kunanbayeva, S. (2016). Intercultural business discourse: Characteristics of Kazakh context. Proceedings of INTCESS2016 3rd international conference on education and social sciences (pp. 154–157).

• Kosinov, S. (2015). Types of control in a democracy. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 3(82), 40–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Lee, C., Pillutla, M., & Law, K. (2000). Power-distance, gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26(4), 685–704.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Melnichuk, А.V. (2014). Introduction of sign-symbolic means of corporate culture in modern organizations in the course of training. Materials of the Afanasiev Readings, 1, 185–188.

  Google Scholar 

• Rabinovich, P. (2017). Main components of legal language: general theoretic overview. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 1(88), 17–29.

• Scherer, K. R. (2000). A cross-cultural investigation of emotion inferences from voice and speech: implications for speech technology. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 379–382).

• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Universals in content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries in advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Simoes, A.J.G, & Hidalgo, C. A. (2011). The economic complexity observatory: An analytical tool for understanding the dynamics of economic development. Workshops at the twenty-fifth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.

• Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 679–704.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. H., & Huo, Y. J. (2000). Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution. Across Cultures. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(4), 1138–1163.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wolfson, N. (1981). Compliments in cross-cultural perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 15(2), 117–124.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zaharna, R. S. (1995). Understanding cultural preferences of Arab communication patterns. Public Relations Review, 21(3), 241–255.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references