Speaker diarization system using MKMFCC parameterization and WLI-fuzzy clustering

• Ajmera, J., McCowan, I., & Bourlard, H. (2004). Robust Speaker Change Detection. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 11(8), 649–651.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anguera, X., Bozonnet, S., Evans, N., Fredouille, C., & Friedland, G. (2010). Speaker diarization: A review of recent research. In Proceedings of IEEE TASLP (pp. 1–14).

• Bakis, R., Chen, S., Gopalakrishnan, P., Gopinath, R., Maes, S., Polymenakos, L., & Franz, M. (1997). Transcription of broadcast news shows with the IBM large vocabulary speech recognition system. In Proceedings of the speech recognition workshop (pp. 67–72).

• Barras, C., Zhu, X., Meignier, S., & Gauvain, J.-L. (2006). Multistage Speaker Diarization of Broadcast News. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 14(5), 1505–1512.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beigi, H., & Maes, S. (1998). Speaker, channel and environment change detection. In Proceedings of the world congress on automation.

• Bezdek, J. C., Ehrlich, R., & Full, W. (1984). FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Computers & Geosciences, 10(2–3), 191–203.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chen, S., & Gopalakrishnan, P. (1998). Speaker, environment and channel change detection and clustering via the bayesian information criterion. Proceedings of DARPA Broadcast News Transcription and Understanding Workshop, 8, 127–132.

  Google Scholar 

• Chen, J., Shue, L., & Ser, W. (2002). A new approach for speaker tracking in reverberant environment. Signal Processing, 82(7), 1023–1028.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• CSTR VCTK Corpus from http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/jyamagis/page3/page58/page58.html

• Davis, S., & Mermelstein, P. (1980). Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Transaction on Acoustic Speech Signal Processing, 28(4), 357–366.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Delgado, H., Anguera, X., Fredouille, C., & Serrano, J. (2015). Fast single- and cross-show speaker diarization using binary key speaker modeling. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 23(12), 2286–2297.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dunn, R. B., Reynolds, D. A., & Quatieri, T. F. (2000). Approaches to speaker detection and tracking in conversational speech. Digital Signal Processing, 10(1–3), 93–112.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• ELSDSR database from http://cogsys.compute.dtu.dk/soundshare/elsdsr.zip

• Evans, N., Bozonnet, S., & Wang, D. (2012). A comparative study of bottom-up and top-down approaches to speaker diarization. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 20(2), 382–392.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gish, H., & Schmidt, N. (1994). Text-independent speaker identification. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 11(4), 18–32.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huijbregts, M., & van Leeuwen, D. A. (2012). Large-scale speaker diarization for long recordings and small collections. IEEE Transaction on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20(2), 404–413.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jiang, J.-Y., Liou, R.-J., & Lee, S.-J. (2011). A fuzzy self-constructing feature clustering algorithm for text classification. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(3), 335–349.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kenny, P., Gupta, V., Stafylakis, T., Ouellet, P. & Alam, J. (2014). Deep neural networks for Baum-Wech statistics for speaker Recognition. In Proceedings of neural networks for speaker and language modelling.

• Kubala, F., Jin, H., Matsoukas, S., Nguyen, L., Schwartz, R., & Makhou, J. (1997). The 1996 BBN Byblos Hub-4 transcription system. In Proceedings of the speech recognition workshop (pp. 90–93).

• Le, V. B., Mella, O., & Fohr, D. (2007). Speaker diarization using normalized cross likelihood ratio. Interspeech, 7, 1869–1872.

  Google Scholar 

• Madikeri, S., Himawan, I., Motlicek, P., & Ferras, M. (2015). Integrating online i-vector extractor with information bottleneck based speaker diarization system. In Interspeech-2015 16 th Annual Conference of the international speech communication association, Dresden, Germany, September 6–10 (pp. 3105–3109).

• Makhoul, J. (1975). Linear prediction: a tutorial review. Proceedings of IEEE, 63(4), 561–580.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meignier, S., Bonastre, J.-F., & Igounet, S. (2001). E-HMM approach for learning and adapting sound models for speaker indexing. In Proceedings of Odyssey workshop (pp. 175–180).

• Moattar, M. H., & Homayounpour, M. M. (2012). Variational conditional random fields for online speaker detection and tracking. Speech Communication, 54(6), 763–780.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Muda, L., Begam, M., & Elamvazuthi, I. (2010). Voice recognition algorithms using Mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) and dynamic time warping (DTW) techniques. Journal of Computing, 2(3), 138–153.

  Google Scholar 

• Nguyen, T. H., Chng, E. S., & Li, H. (2015). Speaker diarization: An emerging research. In T. Ogunfunmi (Ed.), Speech and audio processing for coding, enhancement and recognition, Part II (pp. 229–277). New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• NIST. (2009). The NIST Rich Transcription 2009 (RT’09) evaluation. http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/mig/tests/rt/2009/docs/rt09-meeting-val-plan-v2.pdf.

• Oku, T., Sato, S., Kobayashi, A., Homma, S., & Imai, T. (2012). Low-latency speaker diarization based on Bayesian information criterion with multiple phoneme classes. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (pp. 4189–4192).

• Pertila, P. (2013). Online blind speech separation using multiple acoustic speaker tracking and time–frequency masking. Computer Speech & Language, 27(3), 683–702.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ramaiah, V. S., & Rao, R. R. (in press) A novel approach for speaker diarization system using tmfcc parameterization and lion optimization. Journal of Central South University of Technology.

• Reynolds, D. (2009). Universal background models. In Encyclopedia of biometrics (pp. 1349–1352). New York: Springer.

• Reynolds, D. A., & Rose, R. C. (1995). Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 3(1), 72–83.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Siegler, M. A., Jain, U., Raj, B., & Stern, R. M. (1997). Automatic segmentation, classification and clustering of broadcast news audio. In Proceedings of DARPA speech recognition workshop (pp. 97–99).

• Siegler, M., Jain, U., Ray, B., & Stern, R. (1997). Automatic segmentation, classifcation and clustering of broadcast news audio. In Proceedings of the speech recognition workshop (pp. 97–99).

• Sohal, J. S., & Sukhvinder, K. (2015). Optimization of speaker diarization by reducing diarization error rate: A review. International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, 4, 84–87.

  Google Scholar 

• Stevens, S., & Volkmann, J. (1940). The relation of pitch to frequency: a revised scale. The American Journal of Psychology, 53(3), 329–353.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vijayasenan, D., Valente, F., & Bourlard, H. (2012). Multistream speaker diarization of meetings recordings beyond MFCC and TDOA features. Speech Communication, 54, 55–67.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Woodland, P., Gales, M., Pye, D., & Young, S. (1997). The development of the 1996 HTK broadcast news transcription system. In Proceedings of the speech recognition workshop (pp. 73–78).

• Wu, C.-H., Ouyang, C.-S., Chen, L.-W., & Lu, L.-W. (2013). A new fuzzy clustering validity index with a median factor for centroid-based clustering. IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy System, 23(3), 1–16.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Xu, Y., McLoughlin, I., Song, Y., & Wu, K. (2015). Improved i-vector representation for speaker diarization. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, 35(9), 3393–3404.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references