Abstract
Equity in education is a key concern internationally; however, it is rare that this issue is examined separately for low- and high-achieving students and concurrently across different subject domains. This study examines student and school background characteristics associated with low and high achievement in mathematics and science on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Based on the results of a multilevel multinomial model of achievement for each domain, findings indicate that a greater number of the variables examined are associated with low rather than high achievement. At student level, home language, intention to leave school early, socioeconomic status, grade level, cultural capital, and books in the home are significantly associated with achievement in mathematics and science. At school level, only school average socioeconomic status is statistically significant in the models. Significant gender differences are found in the distribution of high and low achievers, which vary across the domains. In mathematics, females are more likely to be low achievers while males are more likely to be high achievers. In science, gender interacts with early school-leaving intent whereas males intending to leave school early are more likely to be in the low-achieving group than females intending to leave early. Conclusions emphasise the need for targeting resources aimed at promoting equity in outcomes at student level as well as at school level. Future work may extend the current analyses by incorporating domain-specific variables or examining cross-country differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitkin, M., Francis, B., & Hinde, J. (2005). Statistical modelling in GLIM 4. London: Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). London: Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sheffield: Sheffield Region Centre for Science and Technology.
Chiu, M. M., & Xihua, Z. (2008). Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 321–336.
Commission of the European Communities (2008). Migration and mobility: Challenges and opportunities for EU education systems (Green Paper). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
Conaty, C. (2002). Including all: Home, school and community united in education. Dublin: Veritas.
Cosgrove, J., & Cunningham, R. (in press). A multilevel model of science achievement of Irish students participating in the 2006 Programme for International Student Assessment. Irish Journal of Education.
Cosgrove, J., & Gilleece, L. (2009, September). A profile of high and low achievers in Ireland: Reading literacy in PISA 2000, 2003 and 2006. Paper presented at the PISA research conference, Kiel, Germany.
Cosgrove, J., Shiel, G., Sofroniou, N., Zastrutzki, S., & Shortt, F. (2005). Education for life: The achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland in the second cycle of PISA. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
Department of Education & Science (2005). DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity In School): An action plan for educational inclusion. Dublin: Author.
Eivers, E., Shiel, G., & Cunningham, R. (2008). Ready for tomorrow’s world? The competencies of Ireland’s 15-year-olds in PISA 2006. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
Goldstein, H. (1995). Interpreting international comparisons of student achievement. Paris: UNESCO.
Government of Ireland (1998). Education Act (No. 51 of 1998). Dublin: The Stationery Office.
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Shibley Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51.
Hampden-Thompson, G., & Johnston, J. S. (2006). Variation in the relationship between nonschool factors and student achievement. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Kellaghan, T. (2001). Towards a definition of educational disadvantage. Irish Journal of Education, 32, 3–22.
O’Brien, S., & Ó Fathaigh, M. (2004, April). Bringing in Bourdieu’s theory of social capital: Renewing learning partnership approaches to social inclusion. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Educational Studies Association of Ireland, NUI Maynooth, Ireland.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1999). Classifying educational programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world—First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). PISA 2003 data analysis manual. Paris: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world (vol. 1: Analysis). Paris: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: Author.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and non-linear modelling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Willms, J. D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 307–335.
Shiel, G., Cosgrove, J., Sofroniou, N., & Kelly, A. (2001). Ready for life: The literacy achievements of Irish 15-year olds. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
Van de Gaer, E., Gebhardt, E., & Schulz, W. (2009, September). The relationship between achievement and self-concept: A cross-country investigation. Paper presented at the PISA research conference, Kiel, Germany.
Williams, T., & Williams, K. (in press). Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology.
Willms, J. D. (2002). Ten hypotheses about socioeconomic gradients and community differences in children’s developmental outcomes. Montreal, Quebec: Statistics Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilleece, L., Cosgrove, J. & Sofroniou, N. EQUITY IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE OUTCOMES: CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH AND LOW ACHIEVEMENT ON PISA 2006 IN IRELAND. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 8, 475–496 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9199-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9199-2