Gamification to Enhance Motivation and Engagement in Blended eLearning for Technical and Vocational Education and Training

• Adams, E., & Dormans, J. (2012). Game mechanics. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.

  Google Scholar 

• Albertazzi, D., Ferreira, M. G. G., & Forcellini, F. A. (2018). A wide view on gamification. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(2), 191–202.

  Google Scholar 

• Allen, W. C. (2006). Overview and evolution of the ADDIE training system. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(4), 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422306292942.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Amriani, A., Aji, A. F., Utomo, A. Y., & Junus, K. M. (2013). An empirical study of gamification impact on eLearning environment. In Proceedings of 2013 3rd international conference on computer science and network technology (pp. 265–269). IEEE.

• Arbib, M. A. (1992). The cognitive structure of emotions: Andrew Ortony, Gerald L. Clore and Allan Collins.

• Argüelles, A. (2000). Competency based education and training: A world perspective. Editorial Limusa.

• Bartel, A., & Hagel, G. (2016, April). Gamifying the learning of design patterns in software engineering education. In 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 74–79). IEEE.

• Bartel, A., Figas, P., & Hagel, G., (2015), Towards a competency-based education with gamification design elements. In Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (CHI PLAY '15) (pp. 457–462). ACM, New York, NY, USA.

• Bateman, C., & Nacke, L. E. (2010). The neurobiology of play. In Proceedings of the international academic conference on the future of game design and technology (pp. 1–8). ACM.

• Beaudoin, M., Kurtz, G., & Eden, S. (2009). Experiences and opinions of e-learners: What works, what are the challenges, and what competencies ensure successful online learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of ELearning and Learning Objects, 5(1), 275–289.

  Google Scholar 

• Bedard, A. T. (2015). What candy crush saga teaches us about motivating employees. Performance Improvement, 54(4), 43–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for eLearning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855.

  Google Scholar 

• Bielawski, L., & Metcalf, D. S. (2003). Blended elearning: Integrating knowledge, performance, support, and online learning. Human Resource Development. ISBN 9780874257175

• Blanchard, E., & Frasson, C. (2004) An autonomy-oriented system design for enhancement of learner’s motivation in ELearning. In: J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds) Intelligent tutoring systems. ITS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3220. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

• Bosch, C., Mentz, E., & Reitsma, G. M. (2019). Integrating cooperative learning into the combined blended learning design model: Implications for students' intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 11(1), 58–73.

  Google Scholar 

• Brewer E. W., & Burgess D. N. (2005), Professor’s Role in Motivating Students to Attend Class, https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v42n3/brewer.html Accessed 24 August 2017

• Browne, C. J. (2019). Assessing the engagement rates and satisfaction levels of various clinical health science student sub-groups using supplementary eLearning resources in an introductory anatomy and physiology unit. Health Education, 119(1), 2–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.

  Google Scholar 

• Chaiprasurt, C., & Esichaikul, V. (2013). Enhancing motivation in online courses with mobile communication tool support: A comparative study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 377–401.

  Google Scholar 

• Cheong, C., Filippou, J., & Cheong, F. (2014). Towards the gamification of learning: Investigating student perceptions of game elements. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(3), 233–244.

  Google Scholar 

• Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, Vol. 23. Self-processes and development (pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

• da Rocha Seixas, L., Gomes, A. S., & de Melo Filho, I. J. (2016). Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 48–63.

  Google Scholar 

• Dale, S. (2014). Gamification: Making work fun, or making fun of work? Business information review, 31(2), 82–90.

  Google Scholar 

• Deater-Deckard, K., Mallah, S. E., Changb, M., Evans, M. A., & Norton, A. (2014). Student behavioral engagement during mathematics educational video game instruction with 11–14-year olds. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(2014), 101–108.

  Google Scholar 

• de-Marcos, L., Garcia-Lopez, E., & Garcia-Cabot, A., (2016). On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers & Education, 95, 99–113.

• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). ACM.

• Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88.

  Google Scholar 

• Domínguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagé, S. C., & Martínez-HerráIz, J. J., (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392.

  Google Scholar 

• Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.

  Google Scholar 

• Fırat, M., Kılınç, H., & Yüzer, T. V. (2017). Level of intrinsic motivation of distance education students in e-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 63–70.

  Google Scholar 

• Fischhoff, B., & Beyth, R. (1975). I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once—Future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 1–16.

  Google Scholar 

• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

  Google Scholar 

• Garett, R., & Young, S. D. (2019). Health care gamification: A study of game mechanics and elements. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(3), 341–353.

  Google Scholar 

• Glover, I. (2013). Play as you learn: Gamification as a technique for motivating learners. In Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2013. AACE, Chesapeake, VA, 1999–2008. ISBN 9781939797032

• Gonida, E. N., Kiosseoglou, G., & Voulala, K. (2007). Perceptions of parent goals and their contribution to student achievement goal orientation and engagement in the classroom: Grade-level differences across adolescence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(1), 23.

  Google Scholar 

• Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended eLearning systems: Definition, current trends and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended eLearning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In System sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii international conference (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE.

• Hamzah, W., Haji Ali, N., Mohd Saman, M., Yusoff, M., & Yacob, A. (2015). Influence of gamification on students’ motivation in using ELearning applications based on the motivational design model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 10(2), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i2.4355.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hay, D. B., Kehoe, C., Miquel, M. E., Kinchin, I. M., Hatzipanagos, S., Keevil, S. F., et al. (2008). Measuring eLearning quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1037–1056.

  Google Scholar 

• Hodges, C. B. (2004). Designing to motivate: Motivational techniques to incorporate in eLearning experiences. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3), 1–7.

  Google Scholar 

• Hu R., & Shang J. (2018) Application of gamification to blended learning in elementary math instructional design. In S. Cheung, L. Kwok, K. Kubota, L. K. Lee, & J. Tokito (Eds.), Blended learning. enhancing learning success. ICBL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10949.Cham: Springer.

• Husen, T., & Postlethwaite, T. (Eds.). (1994). The international encyclopaedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 7). Oxford: Permagon.

• Ifenthaler, D., Bellin-Mularski, N., & Mah, D. K. (2016). Foundation of digital badges and micro-credentials. Cham: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Iosup, A., & Epema, D. (2014). An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 27–32). ACM.

• Jayalath, J, (2010). Feasibility of using eLearning in capacity building of ICT trainers and delivery of technical, vocational education and training (TVET) courses in Sri Lanka, SEAVERN Journals, vol. 2.

• Jayalath, J., & Esichaikul, V. (2016). Gamification-embedded eLearning courses for the learner success of competency based education: Case of Technical and Vocational Education and Training. Eighth Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning, 28 November 2016, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

• John, V. K., & Duangekanong, D. (2018). eLearning adoption and eLearning satisfaction of learners: A case study of Management Program in a University of Thailand.

• Jovanovic, J., & Devedzic, V. (2014). Open badges: Novel means to motivate, scaffold and recognize learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(1), 115–122.

  Google Scholar 

• Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Hoboken: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Kapp, K. M. (2013). The gamification of learning and instruction fieldbook: Ideas into practice. Hoboken: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of personality assessment, 82(3), 291–305.

  Google Scholar 

• Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Keller, J. M. (2000). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach (pp. 1–13). Santiago: VII Semanario.

  Google Scholar 

• Keller, J. M. (2009). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer Science & Business Media

• Keller, J., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229–239.

  Google Scholar 

• Kendall, J. R., Mason, J. M., & Hunter, W. (1980). Which comprehension? Artifacts in the measurement of reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(4), 233–236.

  Google Scholar 

• Kim, H., Lee, H. J., Cho, H., Kim, E., & Hwang, J. (2018). Replacing self-efficacy in physical activity: Unconscious intervention of the AR Game, Pokémon GO. Sustainability (2071-1050), 10(6).

• Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014). Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 179–188.

  Google Scholar 

• Komiak, S. Y., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 941–960.

• Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. L., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature (Vol. 8). Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.

  Google Scholar 

• Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., Callan, R. C., & Armstrong, M. B. (2015). Psychological theory and the gamification of learning. In T. Reiners & L. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business. Cham: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., & Callan, R. C. (2017). Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 508–515.

  Google Scholar 

• Latchem, C. (2017). ICTs, blended eLearning and TVET transformation. Using ICTs and blended elearning in transforming TVET, UNESCO and Commonwealth of Learning.

• Lee, H., & Doh, Y. Y. (2012). A study on the relationship between educational achievement and emotional engagement in a gameful interface for video lecture systems. In 2012 international symposium on ubiquitous virtual reality (ISUVR), (pp. 34–37). IEEE.

• Lever, J. (1978). Sex differences in the complexity of children's play and games. American Sociological Review, 471–483.

• Liao, C. W., Chen, C. H., & Shih, S. J. (2019). The interactivity of video and collaboration for learning achievement, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and behavior patterns in a digital game-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 133, 43–55.

  Google Scholar 

• Lint, A. H. (2013). ELearning student perceptions on scholarly persistence in the 21st century with social media in higher education. Creative Education, 4(11), 718.

  Google Scholar 

• Lister, M. C. (2015). Gamification: The effect on student motivation and performance at the post-secondary level. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 3(2).

• Lobel, A., Engels, R. C. M. E., Stone, L. L., et al. (2017). Journal of Youth Adolescence, 46, 884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0646-z.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lowe, D. (2012). Perceptual organization and visual recognition (Vol. 5). Berlin: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Lüscher, Z., & Dore, R. (2011) Persistence and dropout in the vocational education high school in Minas Gerais. Program of Vocational Education in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

• Mah, D. K. (2016). Learning analytics and digital badges: Potential impact on student retention in higher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(3), 285–305.

  Google Scholar 

• Malone, T. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333–369.

  Google Scholar 

• Margueratt, D. (2007). Improving learners’ motivation through enhanced instructional design. Unpublished master’s thesis, Athabasca University, Canada.

• Marope, P. T. M., Chakroun, B., & Holmes, K. P. (2015). Unleashing the potential: Transforming technical and vocational education and training. UNESCO Publishing.

• McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York, NY: Penguin.

  Google Scholar 

• McPherson M. A., Nunes M. B., (2008), Critical issues for eLearning delivery: What may seem obvious is not always put into practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

• Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., & Tuch, A. N. (2013). Do points, levels and leaderboards harm intrinsic motivation? An empirical analysis of common gamification elements. In Proceedings of the first international conference on gameful design, research, and applications (pp. 66–73). ACM.

• Milman, N. B. (2016). What is engagement? Distance Learning-Issue, 13(3), 61.

  Google Scholar 

• Muntean, C. I. (2011). Raising engagement in eLearning through gamification. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on virtual learning (pp. 323–329).

• Nduna, N. J. (2017). Promoting effective Work Integrated Learning (WIL) and Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) practices in the TVET sector through research. Vocational Education and Training in Sub-Saharan Africa, 282.

• Petch, J., Calverley, G., Dexter, H., & Cappelli, T. (2007, February). Piloting a process maturity model as an eLearning benchmarking method. In Proceedings of the 5th European conference on elearning: ECEL (p. 273). Academic Conferences Limited.

• Poulsen, A., Lam, K., Cisneros, S., & Trust, T. (2008). Review of ARCS model of motivational design. EDTEC 544

• Prensky, M. (2001). Fun, play and games: What makes games engaging. Digital Game-Based Learning, 5(1), 5–31.

  Google Scholar 

• Raftopoulos, M. (2014). Towards gamification transparency: A conceptual framework for the development of responsible gamified enterprise systems. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 6(2), 159–178.

  Google Scholar 

• Raihan, M. A., & Lock, H. S. (2012). Designing interactive and collaborative eLearning environments for TVET. Journal of Educational Research, 26(2), 177–201.

  Google Scholar 

• Robertson, J., & Howells, C. (2008). Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 559–578.

  Google Scholar 

• Robson, K., Plangger, K., Kietzmann, J. H., McCarthy, I., & Pitt, L. (2015). Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification. Business Horizons, 58(4), 411–420.

  Google Scholar 

• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.

  Google Scholar 

• Şahin, M. (2010). Blended eLearning in vocational education: An experimental study. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 2(6), 95–101.

  Google Scholar 

• Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H., & Klevers, M. (2017). Fostering development of work competencies and motivation via gamification. In Competence-based vocational and professional education (pp. 795–818). Berlin: Springer.

• Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (Eds.). (2005). The game design reader: A rules of play anthology (p. 80). Cambridge: MIT Press.

• Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of human-computer studies, 74, 14–31.

  Google Scholar 

• Shareef, S. G., Ascet, G., & Rajendra, I. C. (2013) Classifying learners based on questionnaire style using Bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Global Technology, 1(3).

• Shin, N. (2003). Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 69–86.

  Google Scholar 

• Sicart, M. (2008). Defining game mechanics. Game Studies, 8(2), 1–14.

  Google Scholar 

• Simões, J., Redondo, R. D., & Vilas, A. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345–353.

  Google Scholar 

• Small, R. V. (1999). Motivation in instructional design. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 89–92.

• Sorden, S. D., & Munene, I. I. (2013). Constructs related to community college student satisfaction in blended learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12, 251–270.

  Google Scholar 

• Stott, A., & Neustaedter, C. (2013). Analysis of gamification in education (p. 8). BC, Canada: Surrey.

  Google Scholar 

• Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful eLearning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), 1183–1202.

  Google Scholar 

• Surendeleg, G., Murwa, V., Yun, H. K., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). The role of gamification in education-a literature review. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 7(29), 1609–1616.

  Google Scholar 

• Svahnberg, M., Van Gurp, J., & Bosch, J. (2005). A taxonomy of variability realization techniques. Software: Practice and Experience, 35(8), 705–754.

  Google Scholar 

• Terzis, V., Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2012). The effect of emotional feedback on behavioral intention to use computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 59(2), 710–721.

  Google Scholar 

• Thurston, T. N. (2018). Design case: Implementing gamification with ARCS to engage digital natives. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 2(1), 5.

  Google Scholar 

• Tiger, L. (2017). The pursuit of pleasure. Routledge.

• UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO General Conference, 38th Session, Paris, 2015, Proposal for the Revised Recommendation Concerning Technical and Vocational Education, 37 C/Resolution 17.

• Uppal, M. A., Ali, S., & Gulliver, S. R. (2018). Factors determining e-learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 412–426.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Eck, R. (Ed.). (2010). Gaming and cognition: Theories and practice from the learning sciences. IGI Global.

• Vu, P., Cao, V., Vu, L., & Cepero, J. (2014). Factors driving learner success in online professional development. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.

• Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Wharton Digital Press.

• Winters, D., & Latham, G. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group & Organization Management, 21(2), 236–250.

  Google Scholar 

• Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225–240.

  Google Scholar 

• Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended eLearning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155–164.

  Google Scholar 

• Wu, W., Martin, B. C., & Ni, C. (2017). A systematic review of competency-based education effort in the health professions: Seeking order out of chaos. Handbook on research on competency-based education in university settings, 352–378.

• Yasak, Z., & Alias, M. (2015). ICT integrations in TVET: Is it up to expectations? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 88–97.

  Google Scholar 

• Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O'Reilly Media, Inc..

• Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(4), 397–417.

  Google Scholar 

Download references