Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Real-Time Density and Thickness Estimation of Thin Asphalt Pavement Overlay During Compaction Using Ground Penetrating Radar Data

  • Published:
Surveys in Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Achieving desired density is crucial for thin asphalt concrete (AC) overlay construction quality control and quality assurance purposes. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) can be implemented for AC pavement layer thickness and density prediction during compaction. However, the overlapping of GPR reflections from surface and bottom of the thin AC overlay, as well as the presence of surface moisture, jeopardizes the prediction accuracy. In this study, a pavement model with thin AC overlay was simulated using gprMax, a finite-difference time-domain-based tool. Surface moisture was simulated as a 2-mm film with mixed electrical properties of water and AC. A nonlinear optimization method was used to address the overlapping and surface moisture issues simultaneously. The error of the thin AC overlay dielectric constant and thickness prediction results was less than 7% and 10%, respectively. Field test during thin overlay compaction was also performed to validate the proposed method. The AC overlay thickness and density estimation accuracies were 91% and 99%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S (2005) Measuring layer thicknesses with GPR—theory to practice. Constr Build Mater 19:763–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annan AP (2005) Ground-penetrating radar. Near-Surf Geophys 357–438

  • Bruckstein AM, Shan TJ, Kailath T (1985) The resolution of overlapping echos. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 33(6):1357–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels DJ (2004) Ground penetrating radar. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diamanti N, Redman D, Giannopoulos A (2010) A study of GPR vertical crack responses in pavement using field data and numerical modelling. In: Proceedings of the XIII international conference on ground penetrating radar, pp 1–6

  • Illinois Department of Transportation (2010) Bureau of Design and Environmental Manual. Retrieved from http://www.idot.illinois.gov/doing-business/procurements/engineering-architectural-professional-services/Consultants-Resources/index

  • Irfan M, Khurshid MB, Labi S (2009) Determining the service life of thin hot-mix asphalt overlay by means of different performance indicators. Transp Res Rec 2108(1):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassem E, Chowdhury A, Scullion T, Masad E (2016) Application of ground-penetrating radar in measuring the density of asphalt pavements and its relationship to mechanical properties. Int J Pavement Eng 17(6):503–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahouar S, Al-Qadi IL (2008) Automatic detection of multiple pavement layers from GPR data. NDT & E Int 41(2):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai WWL, Dérobert X, Annan P (2018) A review of ground penetrating radar application in civil engineering: a 30-year journey from locating and testing to imaging and diagnosis. NDT & E Int 96:58–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng Z, Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S (2011) Development and validation for in situ asphalt mixture density prediction models. NDT & E Int 44(4):369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng Z, Al-Qadi IL, Shangguan P, Son S (2012) Field application of ground-penetrating radar for measurement of asphalt mixture density. Transp Res Rec 2304:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippert DL, Wu S, Ozer H, Al-Qadi IL, Meister JF, Renshaw G, Barry MK, et al (2016) Construction and performance monitoring of various asphalt mixes in Illinois: 2016 Interim Report (No. 16-009). Illinois Center for Transportation, Rantoul, IL

  • Liu H, Sato M (2014) In situ measurement of pavement thickness and dielectric permittivity by GPR using an antenna array. NDT & E Int 64:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loizos A, Plati C (2007) Accuracy of pavement thicknesses estimation using different ground penetrating radar analysis approaches. NDT & E Int 40(2):147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maser KR, Scullion T (1992) Automated pavement subsurface profiling using radar: case studies of four experimental field sites. Transp Res Rec 1344:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata D, Hanifa KI (2017) Evaluation of non-destructive density determination for QA/QC acceptance testing: research project capsule (No. 17-2B). Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rough, LA

  • Muller W (2014). Self-correcting pavement layer depth estimates using 3D multi-offset ground penetrating radar (GPR). In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on ground penetrating radar, pp 887–892

  • Newcomb DE (2009) Thin asphalt overlays for pavement preservation (No. Series 135). National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, MD

  • Romero P, Kuhnow F (2002) Evaluation of new non-nuclear pavement density gauges with data from field projects. Transp Res Rec 1813:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarenketo T, Scullion T (2000) Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar. J Appl Geophys 43:119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shangguan P, Al-Qadi IL, Zhen L, Schmitt RL, Faheem A (2013) Innovative approach for asphalt pavement compaction monitoring with ground-penetrating radar. Transp Res Rec 2347(1):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shangguan P, Al-Qadi IL, Coenen A, Zhao S (2016) Algorithm development for the application of ground-penetrating radar on asphalt pavement compaction monitoring. Int J Pavement Eng 17(3):189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL (2018) Continuous real-time monitoring of flexible pavement layer density and thickness using ground penetrating radar. NDT & E Int 100:48–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL (2019) Real-time monitoring of asphalt concrete pavement density during construction using ground penetrating radar: theory to practice. Transp Res Rec. 0361198119841038

  • Warren C, Giannopoulos A, Giannakis I (2016) GprMax: open source software to simulate electromagnetic wave propagation for ground penetrating radar. Comput Phys Commun 209:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson DE, Heitzman M (2014) Thin asphalt concrete overlays (No. Project 20-05, Topic 44-07). National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn

  • Yee K (1966) Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 14(3):302–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL (2017a) Development of regularization methods on simulated ground-penetrating radar signals to predict thin asphalt overlay thickness. Sig Process 132:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL (2017b) Pavement drainage pipe condition assessment by GPR image reconstruction using FDTD modeling. Constr Build Mater 154:1283–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Shangguan P, Al-Qadi IL (2015) Application of regularized deconvolution technique for predicting pavement thin layer thicknesses from ground penetrating radar data. NDT & E Int 73:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL, Wang S (2018) Prediction of thin asphalt concrete overlay thickness and density using nonlinear optimization of GPR data. NDT & E Int 100:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is based on the results conducted in cooperation with the Illinois Center for Transportation, the Illinois Department of Transportation and the Open Road Paving Company. The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance provided by many individuals including Marshall Thompson and Michael Johnson. Special thanks go to Jeff Kern for his support and assistance. The contents of this paper reflect the view of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Illinois Center for Transportation or the Illinois Department of Transportation. This paper does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siqi Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Zhao, S. & Al-Qadi, I.L. Real-Time Density and Thickness Estimation of Thin Asphalt Pavement Overlay During Compaction Using Ground Penetrating Radar Data. Surv Geophys 41, 431–445 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09556-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09556-6

Keywords

Navigation