Abstract
The effectiveness of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) communication has attracted increasing attention from marketing practitioners, but relatively few studies focus on the dissemination of eWOM communication from a message perspective. Online video is a prominent form of marketing promotion, yet again, little is known about which factors make online video engaging or how they influence recipients’ forwarding intentions. This study adopts Lasswell’s communication model to investigate the persuasiveness of online video and uses the source, content, and channel dimensions to examine three potentially influential factors: awareness of persuasive intent, perceived humor, and multimedia effect. Awareness of persuasive intent exerts a negative influence, whereas the humor and multimedia effects have positive influences on both attitude toward a received online video and forwarding intentions. Therefore, e-marketers should reshape video clips to be humorous, use multimedia effects, and disguise their commercial intent to attract recipients’ attention and persuade them to disseminate an online video.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
The experimental stimuli can be accessed through the following link: https://sites.google.com/site/reserachplatofrm/.
References
Golan, G. J., & Zaidner, L. (2008). Creative strategies in viral advertising: An application of Taylor’s six-segment message strategy wheel. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(4), 959–972.
Hennig-Thurau, T., & Walsh, G. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the Internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 51–74.
Hinz, O., Skiera, B., Barrot, C., & Becker, J. U. (2011). Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 55–71.
Phelps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D., & Raman, N. (2004). Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(4), 333–348.
Ho, J. Y. C., & Dempsey, M. (2010). Viral marketing: Motivations to forward online content. Journal of Business Research, 63(9/10), 1000–1006.
Lian, S. (2011). Innovative Internet video consuming based on media analysis techniques. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(1), 75–89.
Gill, J. (2006). Contagious commercials: How to get in on the Youtube craze. Inc., 28(11), 31–32.
Online-Publishers-Association (2007). Frame of reference: Online video advertising, content and consumer behavior. http://www.online-publishers.org/media/file/OPAFramesofReferenceFINA1024.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2011.
Chiu, H.-C., Hsieh, Y.-C., Kao, Y.-H., & Lee, M. (2007). The determinants of email receivers’ disseminating behaviors on the Internet. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 524–534.
Huang, C.-C., Lin, T.-C., & Lin, K.-J. (2009). Factors affecting pass-along email intentions (PAEIs): Integrating the social capital and social cognition theories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 160–169.
van der Lans, R., van Bruggen, G., Eliashberg, J., & Wierenga, B. (2010). A viral branching model for predicting the spread of electronic word of mouth. Marketing Science, 29(2), 348–365.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dobele, A., Lindgreen, A., Beverland, M., Vanhamme, J., & van Wijk, R. (2007). Why pass on viral messages? Because they connect emotionally. Business Horizons, 50(4), 291–304.
Ajzen, I. (1992). Persuasive communication theory in social psychology: A historical perspective. In M. J. Manfredo (Ed.), Influencing human behavior: Theory and applications in recreation, tourism, and natural resources management (pp. 1–27). Champaign: Sagamore.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Hartcourt Brace.
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), Communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). New York: Harper and Row.
Marsen, S. (2006). Methods and models of communication studies. In S. Marsen (Ed.), Communication studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Duncan, T., & Moriarty, S. E. (1998). A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 1–13.
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On going beyond the information given. In H. E. Gruber, K. R. Hammond, & R. Jessor (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 41–69). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
Morreale, S. P., Spitzberg, B. H., & Barge, J. K. (2001). Human communication: Motivation, knowledge and skills. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Purcell, K. (2010). The State of Online Video. http://www.pewinternet.org/Press-Releases/2010/State-of-Online-Video.aspx. Accessed 30 June 2011.
Madden, M. (2007). Online video proliferates as viewers share what they find online; 57 % of online adults watch or download video. http://www.pewinternet.org/Press-Releases/2007/Online-video-proliferates-as-viewers-share-what-they-find-online-57-of-online-adults-watc.aspx. Accessed 30 June 2011.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287.
Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2007). The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers’ product understanding. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31(3), 475–500.
Dobele, A., Tolemanb, D., & Beverland, M. (2005). Controlled infection! Spreading the brand message through viral marketing. Business Horizons, 48, 143–149.
Cowley, E., & Barron, C. (2008). When product placement goes wrong: The effects of program liking and placement prominence. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 89–98.
Gupta, P. B., & Lord, K. L. (1998). Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20(1), 47–59.
Van Reijmersdal, E. (2009). Brand placement prominence: Good for memory! Bad for attitudes? Journal of Advertising Research, 49(2), 151–153.
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.
Wei, C.-P., Chen, H.-C., & Cheng, T.-H. (2008). Effective spam filtering: A single-class learning and ensemble approach. Decision Support Systems, 45(3), 491–503.
Beard, F. K. (2005). One hundred years of humor in American advertising. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 54–65.
Cline, T. W., Altsech, M. B., & Kellaris, J. J. (2003). When does humor enhance or inhibit Ad responses? The moderating role of the need for humor. Journal of Advertising, 32(3), 31–45.
Shabbir, H., & Thwaites, D. (2007). The use of humor to mask deceptive advertising: It’s no laughing matter. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 75–85.
Eisend, M. (2009). A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 191–203.
Rimé, B., Corsini, S., & Herbette, G. (2002). Emotion, verbal expression, and the social sharing of emotion. In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 185–208). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
Severin, W. (1967). Another look at cue summation. Audio Visual Communication Review, 15(4), 233–245.
Rieber, L. P., Tzeng, S.-C., & Tribble, K. (2004). Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: finding the right mix. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 307–323.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125–139.
Nathan, R. J., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2011). Crucial web usability factors of 36 industries for students: a large-scale empirical study. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2), 151–180.
Cook, D. L., & Coupey, E. (1998). Consumer behavior and unresolved regulatory issues in electronic marketing. Journal of Business Research, 41(3), 231–238.
Appia, O. (2006). Rich media, poor media: The impact of audio/video vs. text/picture testimonial Ads on browsers’ evaluations of commercial web sites and online products. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 28(1), 73–86.
Otondo, R. F., Scotter, J. R. V., Allen, D. G., & Palvia, P. (2008). The complexity of richness: Media, message, and communication outcomes. Information & Management, 45(1), 21–30.
Lutz, R. J. (1985). Antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework. In L. F. Alwitt & A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects: Theory, research, and application (pp. 45–63). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Reardon, J., & Miller, C. (2008). Smoking prevention messages for adolescents: how intensity, valence, and recipient of consequences affect attitude toward the ad and intent to smoke. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(1), 67–77.
Zikmund, W. G. (2007). Business research methods (7th ed.). Mason: South-Western College.
Gulas, C. S., & Weinberger, M. G. (2006). Humor in advertising: A comprehensive analysis. New York: Sharpe.
Weinberger, M. G., Spotts, H., Campbell, L., & Parsons, A. L. (1995). The use and effect of humor in different advertising media. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(3), 44–56.
Arias-Bolzmann, L., Chakraborty, G., & Mowen, J. C. (2000). Effects of absurdity in advertising: The moderating role of product category attitude and the mediating role of cognitive responses. Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 35–49.
Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65–77.
Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2004). The effects of information format and shopping task on consumers’ online shopping behavior: A cognitive fit perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 149–184.
Szymanski, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (2000). E-satisfaction: an initial examination. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 309–322.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Monograph Supplement, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.
Analtech (2010). Adventures of Ana L’Tech. http://www.analtech.com/adventuresofana_hi_res.html. Accessed 30 June 2011.
Netcosm (2007). Network Monitoring Software—NetQoS Netcosm. http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=dtC6ZM0_m8U. Accessed 30 June 2011.
Weinberger, M. G., & Spotts, H. E. (1989). A situational view of information content in TV advertising in the US and UK. Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 89–94.
Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43–54.
Ulbrich, F., Christensen, T., & Stankus, L. (2011). Gender-specific on-line shopping preferences. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2), 1–19.
Feiereisen, S., Broderick, A. J., & Douglas, S. P. (2009). The effect and moderation of gender identity congruity: Utilizing “real women” advertising images. Psychology & Marketing, 26(9), 813–843.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Scale measures
Appendix: Scale measures
Construct | Measure | Item Means | Construct Means | Cronbach’s alpha | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perceived humor | This video is happy | 4.51 | 3.96 | 0.944 | [33] |
This video is interesting | 4.00 | ||||
This video is funny | 3.74 | ||||
This video is humorous | 3.73 | ||||
This is amusing | 3.81 | ||||
Multimedia effect | This video is rich in sound effects | 3.44 | 3.63 | 0.911 | |
This video is rich in visual effects | 3.96 | ||||
This video is rich in multimedia effect | 3.57 | ||||
I video the media used in this video can present sufficient effects | 3.54 | ||||
Awareness of persuasive intent | This video is trying to sell a specific product or a specific brand to me | 4.18 | 4.25 | 0.945 | |
This video is a commercial that is marketing a specific product | 4.21 | ||||
This video was made based on commercial intent | 4.38 | ||||
Attitude toward received online video | This video is appealing | 3.86 | 3.86 | 0.941 | [46] |
This video expresses its ideas clearly | 3.92 | ||||
This video is easy to be understood | 3.94 | ||||
This video is refreshing | 3.80 | ||||
This video is pleasant | 3.77 | ||||
Intention to forward | I think this video is worth sharing with others | 3.92 | 3.76 | 0.921 | [9] |
I will recommend this video to others | 3.85 | ||||
I will share this video to my friends through Internet | 3.52 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsieh, JK., Hsieh, YC. & Tang, YC. Exploring the disseminating behaviors of eWOM marketing: persuasion in online video. Electron Commer Res 12, 201–224 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9091-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9091-y