Abstract
Digital technologies can lead to the provision of innovative opportunities for academic entrepreneurship. However, investigations on the rationale for the adoption of digital technologies for academic entrepreneurship, particularly in emerging economies, remain limited. As a result, the determinants of digital technology adoption for academic entrepreneurship are not fully understood. Drawing on technology adoption and entrepreneurship literature, we propose a research model to investigate the adoption of social media – a type of digital technology - for entrepreneurial activities among students in academic settings. Based on survey data collected from 312 participants, and a partial least square structural equation modeling technique for analysis, this study shows that computer self-efficacy and perceived enjoyment significantly influence perceived ease of use. In addition, perceived job relevance and perceived ease of use significantly influence perceived usefulness. Furthermore, perceived ease of use and students’ perceived entrepreneurial feasibility significantly affect behavioral intention. Moreover, the study shows that behavioral intention significantly affects actual usage. Through these findings, our study advances knowledge on the antecedents of social media adoption for entrepreneurship in academic settings in emerging economies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abbad, M. M. (2021). Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7205–7224.
Adam, I. O., Effah, J., & Boateng, R. (2019). Activity theory analysis of the virtualisation of teaching and teaching environment in a developing country university. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 251–276.
Afful, B., & Akrong, R. (2020). WhatsApp and academic performance among undergraduate students in Ghana: Evidence from the University of Cape Coast. Journal of Education for Business, 95(5), 288–296.
Al Shamsi, J. H., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2022). Understanding key drivers affecting students’ use of artificial intelligence-based voice assistants. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8071–8091.
Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., & Al-Emran, M. (2023). Developing a comprehensive theoretical model for adopting socialmedia in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4324–4345.
Alalwan, N. (2022). Actual use of social media for engagement to enhance students’ learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9767–9789.
Ansah, G. N. (2014). Re-examining the fluctuations in language in-education policies in post-independence Ghana. Multilingual Education, 4, 1–15.
Audretsch, D. B., & Kayalar-Erdem, D. (2005). Determinants of scientist entrepreneurship: An integrative research agenda (pp. 97–118). Interdisciplinary Perspectives.
Barfi, K. A., Bervell, B., & Arkorful, V. (2021). Integration of social media for smart pedagogy: Initial perceptions of senior high school students in Ghana. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3033–3055.
Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128–143.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Publishers: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 189–211.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.
Dell’Atti, V., Russo, G., Dicuonzo, G., & Palmaccio, M. (2023). Digital academic entrepreneurship: Knowledge and public value from an Italian case study. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(5), 1–14.
Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). An extended hedonic motivation adoption model of TikTok in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13595–13617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11749-x
Faqih, K. M., & Jaradat, M. I. R. M. (2015). Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 37–52.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2014). Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1.
Ghana Statistical Service. (2023). Ghana fact sheet. Retrieved July, 2023, from https://statsghana.gov.gh/ghfactsheet.php#:~:text=Ghana%20has%20a%20young%20age,under%20the%20age%20of%2025
Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017). Digital technology entrepreneurship: A definition and research agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5), 44–51.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: Evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 105–131.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S., et al. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. In Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: a workbook (pp. 1–29).
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 616–632.
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027.
Jumpah, E. T., Ampadu-Ameyaw, R., & Owusu-Arthur, J. (2020). Youth employment in Ghana: Economic and social development policies perspective. World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development, 16(4), 413–427.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
Kpessa-Whyte, M., & Dzisah, J. (2022). Digitalisation of basic services in Ghana: State of policies in action and lesson for progress. INCLUDE.
Krueger, N. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–21.
Lee, W., Wong, A., & Tong, C. (2014). A qualitative study of the software adoption of building information modelling technology in the Hong Kong construction industry. Business and Economic Research, 4(2), 222.
Liñán, F., & Santos, F. J. (2007). Does social capital affect entrepreneurial intentions? International Advances in Economic Research, 13, 443–453.
Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11, 907–933.
Liu, Y., Sun, J. C. Y., & Chen, S. K. (2021). Comparing technology acceptance of AR-based and 3D map-based mobile library applications: A multigroup SEM analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1955271
MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88 No(4), 542–555.
Matarirano, O., Panicker, M., Jere, N. R., & Maliwa, A. (2021). External factors affecting blackboard learning management system adoption by students: Evidence from a historically disadvantaged higher education institution in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 35(2), 188–206.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–191.
Matthess, M., & Kunkel, S. (2020). Structural change and digitalization in developing countries: Conceptually linking the two transformations. Technology in Society, 63, 101428.
Ministry of Education. (2018). The Ghana education reform agenda. Ministry of Education. Retrieved July, 2023, from https://moe.gov.gh/index.php/education-reform/
Muafi, M., Syafri, W., Prabowo, H., & Nur, S. A. (2021). Digital entrepreneurship in Indonesia: A human capital perspective. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 8(3), 351–359.
Nachira, F., Dini, P., & Nicolai, A. (2007). A network of digital business ecosystems for Europe: Roots, processes and perspectives. European Commission Bruxelles Introductory Paper, 106, 1–20.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238.
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055.
Oppong, G. Y. S., Singh, S., & Kujur, F. (2020). Potential of digital technologies in academic entrepreneurship–a study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(7), 1449–1476.
Rice, M. F. (2003). Information and communication technologies and the global digital divide: Technology transfer, development, and least developing countries. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 1(1), 72–88.
Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886.
Rippa, P., & Secundo, G. (2019). Digital academic entrepreneurship: The potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 900–911.
Sasu, D. D. (2022). Total number of active social media users in Ghana from 2017 to 2022 (in millions). Retrieved June, 2023, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1171445/number-of-social-media-users-ghana/
Sasu, D. D. (2023). Forecast of the e-commerce market revenue in Ghana from 2017 to 2027 (in million U.S. dollars). Retrieved July, 2023, from https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1343449/ecommerce-market-revenue-ghana
Secundo, G., Rippa, P., & Cerchione, R. (2020). Digital Academic Entrepreneurship: A structured literature review and avenue for a research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120118.
Senyo, P. K., Liu, K., & Effah, J. (2019). Digital business ecosystem: Literature review and a framework for future research. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 52–64.
Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLS predict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347.
Somsuk, N., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2014). A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: Resource-based view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 198–210.
Tekic, Z., & Koroteev, D. (2019). From disruptively digital to proudly analog: A holistic typology of digital transformation strategies. Business Horizons, 62(6), 683–693.
Toniolo, K., Masiero, E., Massaro, M., & Bagnoli, C. (2020). A grounded theory study for digital academic entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(7), 1567–1587.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
Völckner, F., Sattler, H., Hennig-Thurau, T., & Ringle, C. M. (2010). The role of parent brand quality for service brand extension success. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 379–396.
Vorbach, S., Poandl, E. M., & Korajman, I. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship education: The role of MOOCs. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(3), 99–111.
Zolait, A. H. S. (2014). The nature and components of perceived behavioural control as an element of theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(1), 65–85.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was carried out without an ethics issue.
Consent to participate
All participants gave their consent for participation.
Consent for publication
All authors gave their consent for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Attuquayefio, S., Aboagye-Darko, D. & Okronipa, A.Q. Digital academic entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Antecedents of social media adoption for academic entrepreneurship. Educ Inf Technol 29, 11765–11791 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12286-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12286-3