Factors affecting use of e-learning platform (SPeCTRUM) among University students in Malaysia

• Accuosti, J. (2014). Factors affecting education technology success. Proceeding of the ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference, April 3–5, 2014, University of Bridgeport, Bridgpeort, CT, USA.

• Ali, A. (2004). Issues and challenges in implementing e-learning in Malaysia. Open University of Malaysia Publication, 1–9.

• Awais Bhatti, M. (2015). E-training adoption in the Nigerian Civil Service. European Journal of Training and Development, 39(6), 1–25.

• Bates, T. (2001). National strategies for e-learning in post- secondary education and training. Fundamentals of educational planning, No. 70. http://www.unesco.org/iiep2008/08/06. Retrieved on 6 Aug 2008.

• Caroll, N. (2013). E-learning – the McDonaldization of education. European Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 342–356.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (1999). Students’ perceptions of the efficacy of Web-based learning environment: the emergence of a new learning instrument. HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, 12–15.

• Cole, J., & Foster, H. (2007). Using moodle: teaching with the popular open source course management system. Google e-Book.

• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and quantitative descriptive research method approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Delone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Frost & Sullivan. (2010). Policy on ICT in Education Malaysia. Retrieved from www.mscmalaysia.my: http://www.mscmalaysia.my/codenavia/portals/msc/images/pdf/Policy%20on%20ICT%20in%20Education%20Malaysia%202010.pdf.

• Hussain, R. M. (2004). E-learning in higher education institutions in Malaysia. E-mento, 5(7), 72–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Jenkins, M., Browne, T., Walker, R., & Hewitt, R. (2011). The development of technology enhanced learning: Findings from a 2008 survey of UK higher education institutions. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 447–465.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones, N., & Man, A. (2010). Blending learning: Widening participation in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(4), 405–416.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kamsin, A. (2005). Is e-learning the solution and substitute for conventional learning? International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 13(3), 79–89.

  Google Scholar 

• Karim, M. R., & Hashim, Y. (2004). The experience of the e-learning implementation at the Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 1(1), 50–59.

  Google Scholar 

• Keller, C., & Cenerud, L. (2002). Students’ perceptions of e‐learning in University education. Journal of Educational Media, 27(1–2), 55–67.

  Google Scholar 

• Khan, K., & Badii, A. (2012). Impact of E-learning on higher education: Development of an e-learning framework. Life Science Journal, 9(4), 4073–4082.

  Google Scholar 

• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty‐first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 3(3), 257–274.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee, C., & Yen, P. (2009). E‐learning in Malaysia: Success factors in implementing e‐learning program. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 237–246.

  Google Scholar 

• Raja Maznah Raja Hussain (2004). eLearning in higher education institutions in Malaysia. e-mentor, 5(7).

• Oyadonghan, J. C. & Eke, F. M. (2011). Factors affecting student use of information technology: a comparative study of federal university of technology, Owerri and Niger Delta University, Amazoma. Library Philosophy and Practice e-journal, 505.

• Özgen, C. (2012). Toward an understanding of acceptance of electronic performance support systems: What drives users ‘perceptions regarding usefulness and ease of use? Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University.

• Puteh, M. (2007). E-learning in Malaysian Public Universities: Case Studies of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention, (pp. 825–834). Senai, Johor Bahru.

• Puteh, M., & Hussin, S. (2007). A comparative study of e-learning practices at Malaysian Private Universities. 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention, (pp. 1177–1188). Senai, Johor Bahru.

• Sife, A., Lwoga, E., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT 3(2).

• Sun, P., Tsai, R., Finger, G., Chen, Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a succesful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learners’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 1183–1202.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tobins, K. (1998). Qualitative Perceptions of Learning Environments on the World Wide Web. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobins (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 581–594). United Kingdom: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Trochim, W. (2010). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Cincinnati: Atomic Dog Publishing.

  Google Scholar 

• Veeramani, M. (2010). E-learning: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(2), 20–24.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.

  Google Scholar 

Download references