Abstract
This paper addresses the relative errors associated with simple versus realistic (or science-based) models. We take the perspective of trying to predict what the model will predict as we begin to build the model. Any model building process can get the model “wrong” to a greater or lesser extent by making a theoretical mistake in constructing the model. In addition, every model needs data of some sort, whether it be obtained by experiments, surveys or expert judgment, and the data collection process is filled with error sources. This paper suggests a hypothesis that
-
1.
simple models have a larger variance in their predication of a result than do more realistic models (something most people intuitively agree to), and
-
2.
more realistic models still have a significant probability of an error because the errors in the model building process will result in a probability distribution that ought to be bimodal, trimodal, or higher multimodal.
The paper provides evidence to support these statements and draws conclusions about what types of models to generate and when.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Box GEP (1979) Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In: Launer RL, Wilkinson GN (eds) Robustness in Statistics. Academic Press, New York
Clemen RT (1989) Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. Int J Forecast 5:559–583
Clemen RT, Winkler RL (2006) Aggregating probability distributions. In: Edwards, Miles, von Winterfeldt (eds) Advances in decision analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Collopy F, Armstrong JS (1992) Expert opinions about extrapolation and the mystery of the overlooked discontinuities. Int J Forecast 8:575–582
Dani V, Madani O, Pennock D, Sanghai S, Galebach B (2006) An empirical comparison of algorithms for aggregating experts. In: Dechter R, Richardson TS (eds) Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: proceedings of the twenty second conference. AUAI Press, Cambridge, MA
Friedman M (1953) The methodology of positive economics. In: Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Henrion M, Fischoff B (1986) Assessing uncertainty in physical constants. Am J Phys 54:791–798
McCullough D (2003) The course of human events. 32nd Jefferson lecture in the humanities, delivered on 15 May 2003 at the Ronald Reagan International Trade Center
Peterson CR, Beach LR (1967) Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychol Bull 68:29–46
Stanford RA (2002) Managerial economics. http://facweb/furman.edu/~dstanford/mecon/mecon1.htm
Weart S (2006) The discovery of global warming. http://www.aip.org/history/climate/GCM.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buede, D. Errors associated with simple versus realistic models. Comput Math Organ Theory 15, 11–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-008-9047-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-008-9047-x