Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Privacy considerations for a decentralized finance (DeFi) loans platform

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending platforms that offer users to obtain a loan by committing a collateral or by calculating a “credit score”, which is based on factors such as the users’ credit history. However, the requirements of collateral and credit history are quite burdensome for some users. Nowadays, with more than 55% of the global population using social media, there is a lot of publicly available personal data (Global Social Media Stats. https://datareportal.com/social-media-users. Accessed 27 March 2022). This data could be used as an alternative risk mitigator for lending. There are many inferences that can be drawn from the users’ social media accounts about their professional behavior and reliability, allowing us to derive the users’ social trustworthiness. We propose to calculate a “social score” based on the social media data of a user. Our contribution is to develop an Ethereum blockchain-enabled fully decentralized lending platform that relies on this score. This platform could give users a chance for a loan even if they do not have a collateral or a sufficient credit score. Furthermore, we discuss privacy considerations for our platform and present an enhanced version that protects the borrower’s privacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset used for the current study is available in the Stanford Network Analysis Project (SNAP) repository, https://snap.stanford.edu/data/ego-Facebook.html. The dataset is called “Social circles: Facebook” [2].

References

  1. Global Social Media Stats. https://datareportal.com/social-media-users. Accessed 27 March 2022

  2. SNAP: Network Datasets: Social Circles: Facebook. https://snap.stanford.edu/data/ego-Facebook.html. Accessed 27 March 2022

  3. Zopa: First Peer-to-peer Lending Platform in the UK. https://www.zopa.com/. Accessed 27 March 2022

  4. Businesswire: Global Peer to Peer (P2P) Lending Market Trends, Growth, Opportunity Report 2020-2025. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201215005523/en/Global-Peer-to-Peer-P2P-Lending-Market-Trends-Growth-Opportunity-Report-2020-2025. Accessed 27 March 2022

  5. CoinLoan: Peer-to-peer Lending Platform. https://coinloan.io/. Accessed 27 March 2022

  6. InLock: Peer-to-peer Lending Platform. https://inlock.io/. Accessed 27 March 2022

  7. Prosper: Peer-to-peer Lending Platform. https://www.prosper.com/. Accessed 27 March 2022

  8. Lendingclub. https://www.lendingclub.com/. Accessed 27 March 2022

  9. Fico Score. https://www.fico.com/en/products/fico-score. Accessed 27 March 2022

  10. Dubos, R.: Social Capital: Theory and Research. Routledge, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Field, J.: Social capital in policy and practice. In: Social Capital, pp. 84–99. Routledge (2016)

  12. Gurajala, S., White, J.S., Hudson, B., Voter, B.R., Matthews, J.N.: Profile characteristics of fake twitter accounts. Big Data Soc. 3(2), 1–13 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ścigała, K.A., Schild, C., Zettler, I.: Dishonesty as a signal of trustworthiness: honesty-humility and trustworthy dishonesty. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7(10), 200685 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartmann, J., Hasan, O.: A social-capital based approach to blockchain-enabled peer-to-peer lending. In: The Third IEEE International Conference on Blockchain Computing and Applications (BCCA 2021), pp. 105–110 (2021)

  15. Hayes, G.: The Beginners Guide to Using an Ethereum Test Network. https://medium.com/compound-finance/the-beginners-guide-to-using-an-ethereum-test-network-95bbbc85fc1d. Accessed 10 Sept 2022

  16. IBM: what are smart contracts on blockchain? https://www.ibm.com/topics/smart-contracts. Accessed 10 Sept 2022

  17. Hasan, O., Brunie, L., Bertino, E., Shang, N.: A decentralized privacy preserving reputation protocol for the malicious adversarial model. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 8(6), 949–962 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rappe, D.K.: Homomorphic cryptosystems and their applications. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2006/001. https://eprint.iacr.org/2006/001 (2006)

  19. Cryptographic Hash Functions. https://www.ics.uci.edu/texttildelow keldefra/teaching/fall2016/uci_compsci134/slides/LEC5-KED.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2022

  20. Cryptography Hash Functions. https://www.tutorialspoint.com/cryptography/cryptography_hash_functions.htm. Accessed 27 March 2022

  21. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., Goldfeder, S.: Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (CRAM). https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/challenge-response-authentication-mechanism-cram/. Accessed 10 Sept 2022

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar Hasan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartmann, J., Hasan, O. Privacy considerations for a decentralized finance (DeFi) loans platform. Cluster Comput 26, 2147–2161 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03772-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03772-3

Keywords

Navigation