Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small and medium-sized firms form 90% of the worldwide population of businesses. However, it has been argued that given their smaller scale of operations, resource access constraints and lower visibility, smaller firms are less likely to participate in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives. This article examines the different economic motivations of firms with varying combinations of visibility, resource access and scale of operations. Arguments are presented to propose that in terms of visibility, resource access and operating scale, very small and very large firms are equally motivated to participate in CSR. However, the motivational bases for CSR participation are likely to be different. Medium-sized firms are the least motivated. This suggests a U-shaped relationship between firm size and CSR participation. This study contributes towards resolution of the long-standing debate on the effects of firm size on CSR participation, and highlights the importance of considering configurations of firm characteristics in the study of CSR outcomes. In conclusion, cautions are raised against the broad categorization of firms, without adequate attention to the underlying dimensions of such categorizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams M., P. Hardwick (1998) An Analysis of Corporate Donations: United Kingdom Evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 641–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albinger H. S., S. J. Freeman (2000) Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon-Correa J. A., S. Sharma (2003) A Contingent Resource-based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28, 71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson L., J. Galaskiewicz (1988) Stock Ownership and Company Contributions to Charity. Administrative science Quarterly, 33, 82–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkus B. R., S. A. Morris, B. Seifert (2002) Governance and Corporate Philanthropy: Restraining Robin Hood? Business and Society, 41, 319–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhambri A., J. Sonnenfeld (1988) Organization Structure and Corporate Social Performance: A Field Study in Two Contrasting Industries. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 642–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin-Dufresne F., P. Savaria (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Risk. Journal of Investing, 13, 57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell L., C. S. Gulas, T. S. Gruca (1999) Corporate Giving Behavior and Decision-maker Social Consciousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, S. S., L. B. Ferreri and L. D. Parker: 1987, `The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency-Based Analysis', Accounting, Organizations and Society 12, 111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L. (2001) The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., L. R. Preston (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee T. W., D. Hess (2000). The Legitimacy of Direct Corporate Humanitarian Investment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, 95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess D., N. Rogovsky, T. W. Dunfee (2002) The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 44, 110–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman A. J., G. D. Keim (2001) Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghiemestra R.: (2000) Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted B. W. (2000) A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society, 39, 24–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H. (2004) A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective. Journal of General Management, 29, 37–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R. A., D. W. Greening (1999) The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones M. T. (1999) The Institutional Determinants of Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner B. E., D. Payne (2002) Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos G. P. (2001) The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 595–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis S. (2003) Reputation and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Communication Management, 7, 356–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden K., W. Scaife, K. Crissman (2006) How and Why Small to Medium Size Enterprises (SMEs) Engage with Their Communities: An Australian Study. International Journal of Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11, 49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I., O. C. Ferrell (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis J. D., J. P. Walsh (2003) Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy K. M., J. J. Siegfried (1985) The Effect of Firm Size on Corporate Philanthropy. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 25, 18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire J. B., A. Sundgren, T. Schneeweiss (1988) Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, B.: 2001, ‹Coca-Cola, Gates Help Step Up Assault on AIDS’, Wall Street Journal, June 20 ed., B1

  • McWilliams A., D. Siegel (2001) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meznar M. B., D. Nigh (1995) Buffer or Bridge? Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Public Affairs Activities in American Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 975–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles R. (1987), Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A Grounded Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro P. (1988) Why do Corporations Give to Charity?. Journal of Business, 61, 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C. (1991) Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky M., F. L. Schmidt, S. L. Rynes (2003) Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen C. L., R. F. Scherer (1993) Social Responsibility and Market Share. Review of Business, 15, 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J., G. R. Salancik (1978) The External Control of Organizations. Harper & Row, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. E., M. R. Kramer (2002) The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 12, 56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiia D. H. (2002) Philanthropy and Corporate Citizenship: Strategic Philanthropy is Good Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1, 57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiia D. H., A. B. Carroll, A. K. Buchholtz (2003) Philanthropy as Strategy: When Corporate Charity Begins at Home. Business and Society, 42, 169–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez C. M. (2000) Motives for Corporate Philanthropy in El Salvador: Altruism and Political Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard J. M., M. Betz, L. O’Connell (1997) The Proactive Corporation: Its Nature and Causes. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1001–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C. (1994) The New Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72, 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen Brammer S., A. Millington (2006) Firm Size, Organizational Visibility and Corporate Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman M. C. (1995) Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Industrial Development Organization: 2002, Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications for Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries

  • Van de Ven B., R. Jeurissen (2005) Competing Responsibly. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 299–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S. A., S. B. Graves (1997) The Corporate Social Performance-financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver G. R., L. K. Trevino, P. L. Cochran (1999) Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business Policy, National University of Singapore, 02-04, BIZ 1, NUS Business School, 1 Business Link, Singapore, 117592, Singapore

    Krishna Udayasankar

Authors
  1. Krishna Udayasankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna Udayasankar.

Additional information

This study was supported by Academic Research Fund Grant no. R-313-000-069-112 from the Ministry of Education, Singapore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Udayasankar, K. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size. J Bus Ethics 83, 167–175 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9609-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9609-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation