Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investing: A Global Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and company stock valuation across three regions of the world. After a brief introduction, the article gives an overview of the evolving definition of CSR as well as a discussion of the ways in which this construct has been operationalized. Presentation of the potential impact of corporate social performance on firm financial performance follows, including investor characteristics, the rationale behind their choices, and their influence on the marketplace for securities worldwide. The unique method used to select socially responsible investments is then provided that also includes a description of the quantitative techniques employed in the analyses. Results are offered subsequently, and the close describes implications for global enterprises as socially responsible investments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Becker-Olson K. L., C. B. Andrew, Hill R. P. (2006) The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research 59:46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham E. F., Gapenski L. C., Ehrhardt M. C. (1999). Financial Management: Theory and Practice, Ninth Edition. Dryden Press, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A. B. (1979) A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4):497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A. B. (1998) The Four Faces of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review 100(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A. B. (1999) Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business and Society 38:268–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin P. A., Brown T. J. (1997) The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing 61:68–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenburg S., Greene T., Erekson H. (2003) Approaching Socially Responsible Investment with a Comprehensive rating Scale: Total Social Impact. Journal of Business Ethics 43:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diltz J. D. (1995) Does Social Screening Affect Portfolio Performance?. Journal of Investing 4(Spring):64–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright M. E. (1994) Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Guying Criterion. Journal of Marketing 58(3):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein E. M. (1989) Business Ethic, Corporate Good Citizenship and the Corporate Social Policy Process: A View from the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 8:583–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick W. C. (1994) From CSR1 to CSR2: The Maturing of Business and Society Thought. Business and Society 33:150–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick W. C. (1998) Creatures, Corporations, Communities, Chaos, Complexity. Business and Society 37:358–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine 33:122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby J. R., Hunt S. D. (1992) Cognitive Moral Development and Marketing. Journal of Marketing 56:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerard J. B. (1997) Is There a Cost to Being Socially Responsible in Investing? Journal of Investing 6:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill R. P., Cassill D. (2004) The Naturological View of the Corporation and its Social Responsibility: An Extension of the Frederick Model of Corporate–Community Relationships. Business and Society Review 109:281–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R. P., Stephens D. L., Smith I. (2003) Corporate Social Responsibility: An Examination of Individual Firm Behavior. Business and Society Review 108:339–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted B. W. (2000) A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society 39:24–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley P. C., Elm D. R. (2003) The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones’s Issue-Contingent Model. Journal of Business Ethics 48:139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumsick B. (2003) Socially Responsible High Tech Companies: Emerging Issues. Journal of Business Ethics 43:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer W. S. (2003) Social Screening of Investments: An Introduction. Journal of Business Ethics 43:163–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Etang J. (1995) Ethical Corporate Social Responsibility: A Framework for Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 14:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machan T. R. (2004) Aristotle and the Moral Status of Business. Journal of Value Inquiry 38:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I. (2001) Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 30:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. (2001) People and Profits: The Search for a Link between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance. Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. 1986, ‘Happy Returns for Do-gooders’, Financial World, March 18, 32–33.

  • Moir L. (2001) What Do We Mean by Corporate Social Responsibility?. Corporate Governance 1(2):16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Torres M. J., Fernandez-Izquierdo M. A., Balaguer-Franch M. R. (2004) The Social Responsibility Performance of Ethical and Solidarity Funds: An Approach to the Case of Spain. Business Ethics 13:200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. 1994, ‘The Seven (Almost) Deadly Sins of High-Minded Entrepreneurs’, Inc 16(7), 47, 48, 51

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasi J., Nasi S., Phillips N., Zyglidopoulos S. (1997) The Evolution of Corporate Social Responsiveness: An Exploratory Study of Finnish and Canadian Forestry Companies. Business and Society 36:296–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. (2003), Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3):403–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivoli P. (2003) Labor Standards in the Global Economy: Issues for Investors. Journal of Business Ethics 43:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin D. P., Reidenbach R. E. (1987) Social, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap between Concept and Application. Journal of Marketing 51:44–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen B. N., Sandler D. M., Shani D. (1991) Social Issues and Social Responsible Investment Behavior: A Preliminary Empirical Investigation. Journal of Consumer Affairs 25:221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer D. A. (1997) The Impact of Socially-Responsible Screens on Investment Performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund. Review of Financial Economics 6(2):137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shank T. M., Manullang D., Hill R. P. (2005) Doing Well While Doing Good’ Revisited: A Study of Socially Responsible Firm’s Short-term versus Long-term Performance. Managerial Finance 30(8):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon D. G., Lane P. J. (2004) A Model of Cultural Differences and International Alliance Performance. Journal of International Business Studies 35(4):306–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S. M., Alcorn D. S. (1991) Cause Marketing: A New Direction in the Marketing of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing 8:19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer R. C. (2001) Assets in Socially Screened Investments Grew by 183%. Employee Benefit Plan Review 56:30–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Statman, M. 2000, ‘Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’, Financial Analysts Journal May/June, 30–39

  • Stone B. A. (2001) Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Investment. Business and Society 40(1):112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D. C., Au K. (2002) The Effect of Cultural Differences on Behavioral Responses to Low Job Satisfaction. Journal of International Business Studies 33(2):309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood D. J. (1991) Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review 16:691–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Paul Hill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, R.P., Ainscough, T., Shank, T. et al. Corporate Social Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investing: A Global Perspective. J Bus Ethics 70, 165–174 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9103-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9103-8

Keywords

Navigation