Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Selfish herds optimization algorithm with orthogonal design and information update for training multi-layer perceptron neural network

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selfish herd optimization algorithm is a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm, which simulates the group behavior of herds when attacked by predators in nature. With the further research of algorithm, it is found that the algorithm cannot get a better global optimal solution in solving some problems. In order to improve the optimization ability of the algorithm, we propose a selfish herd optimization algorithm with orthogonal design and information update (OISHO) in this paper. Through using orthogonal design method, a more competitive candidate solution can be generated. If the candidate solution is better than the global optimal solution, it will replace the global optimal solution. At the same time, at the end of each iteration, we update the population information of the algorithm. The purpose is to increase the diversity of the population, so that the algorithm expands its search space to find better solutions. In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, it is used to train multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network. For training multi-layer perceptron neural network, this is a challenging task to present a satisfactory and effective training algorithm. We chose twenty different datasets from UCI machine learning repository as training dataset, and the experimental results are compared with SSA, GG-GSA, GSO, GOA, WOA and SOS, respectively. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has better optimization accuracy, convergence speed and stability compared with other algorithms for training multi-layer perceptron neural network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig. 45
Fig. 46
Fig. 47
Fig. 48
Fig. 49
Fig. 50
Fig. 51
Fig. 52
Fig. 53
Fig. 54
Fig. 55
Fig. 56
Fig. 57
Fig. 58
Fig. 59
Fig. 60
Fig. 61
Fig. 62
Fig. 63
Fig. 64
Fig. 65
Fig. 66
Fig. 67
Fig. 68
Fig. 69
Fig. 70
Fig. 71
Fig. 72
Fig. 73
Fig. 74
Fig. 75
Fig. 76
Fig. 77
Fig. 78
Fig. 79
Fig. 80
Fig. 81
Fig. 82

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5(4):115–133

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Verpoort PC, MacDonald P, Conduit GJ (2018) Materials data validation and imputation with an artificial neural network. Comput Mater Sci 147:176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manngard M, Kronqvist J, Jari M (2018) Böling. Structural learning in artificial neural networks using sparse optimization. Neurocomputing 272(10):660–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tavana M, Abtahi A-R, Di Caprio D, Poortarigh M (2018) An Artificial Neural Network and Bayesian Network model for liquidity risk assessment in banking. Neurocomputing 275(31):2525–2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leśniak A, Juszczyk M (2018) Prediction of site overhead costs with the use of artificial neural network based model. Arch Civil Mech Eng 18(3):973–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulero Á, Pierantozzi M, Cachadiña I, Di Nicola G (2017) An Artificial Neural Network for the surface tension of alcohols. Fluid Phase Equilibria 449(15):28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim K-KK, Patrón ER, Braatz RD (2018) Standard representation and unified stability analysis for dynamic artificial neural network models. Neural Netw 98:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Valero D, Bung DB (2018) Artificial Neural Networks and pattern recognition for air-water flow velocity estimation using a single-tip optical fibre probe. J Hydro-Environ Res 19:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lai CC (2018) Kuo L.Su. Development of an intelligent mobile robot localization system using Kinect RGB-D mapping and neural network. Comput Electr Eng 67:620–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reale C, Gavin K, Librić L, Jurić-Kaćunić D (2018) Automatic classification of fine-grained soils using CPT measurements and Artificial Neural Networks. Adv Eng Inform 36:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaymak S, Helwan A, Uzun D (2017) Breast cancer image classification using artificial neural networks. Proc Comput Sci 120:126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sitton JD, Zeinali Y, Brett A (2017) Story. Rapid soil classification using artificial neural networks for use in constructing compressed earth blocks. Construct Build Mater 138(1):214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krishnan R, Dharani A (2016) Classification Analysis of Topographical Features Using Artificial Neural Network. Proc Technol 25:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hiew BY, Tan SC, Lim WS (2016) Intra-specific competitive co-evolutionary artificial neural network for data classification. Neurocomputing 185(12):220–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bardou D, Zhang K, Ahmad SM (2018) Lung sounds classification using convolutional neural networks. Artif Intell Med 88:58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Erkaymaz O, Ozer M, Perc M (2017) Performance of small-world feedforward neural networks for the diagnosis of diabetes. Appl Math Comput 311(15):22–28

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang F, Yan L, Ling L (2018) Doubly stochastic radial basis function methods. J Comput Phys 363(15):87–97

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kulkarni SR, Rajendran B (2018) Spiking neural networks for handwritten digit recognition—Supervised learning and network optimization. Neural Netw 103:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng S, Chi-Man P (2018) Multi-scale hierarchical recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral image classification. Neurocomputing 294(14):82–93

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nan W, Wenxiao S, Shaoshuai F, Shuxiang L (2011) PSO-FNN-based vertical handoff decision algorithm in heterogeneous wireless networks. Proc Environ Sci 11:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hameed AA, Karlik B, Salman MS (2016) Back-propagation algorithm with variable adaptive momentum. Knowledge-Based Syst 114(15):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Montana DJ, Davis L (1989) Training feedforward neural networks using genetic algorithms. Proc Int Joint Conf Artif Intell (IJCAI '89), Detroit, Mich USA 89:762–767

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Li W (2018) Improving particle swarm optimization based on neighborhood and historical memory for training multi-layer perceptron. Information 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9010016.

  24. Gambhir S, Malik SK, Kumar Y (2017) PSO-ANN based diagnostic model for the early detection of dengue disease. New Horizons Translat Med 4(4):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu H, Zhou Y, Luo Q, Basset MA (2016) Training feedforward neural networks using symbiotic organisms search algorithm. Comput Intell Neurosci Article ID 9063065, 14 pages

  26. Aljarah I, Faris H, Mirjalili S (2016) Optimizing connection weights in neural networks using the whale optimization algorithm. Soft Comput 22(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bohat VK, Arya KV (2018) An effective gbest-guide d gravitational search algorithm for real-parameter optimization and its application in training of feedforward neural networks. Knowledge-Based Syst 143:192–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alboaneen DA, Tianfield H, Zhang Y (2017) Glowworm Swarm Optimization for Training Multi-Layer Perceptrons. BDCAT’17, Session: Deep Learning, Austin, Texas, USA: 131–138

  29. Heidari AA, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mirjalili S (2018) An efficient hybrid multilayer perceptron neural network with grasshopper optimization. Soft Computing.: 1–18

  30. Abusnaina AA, Ahmad S, Jarrar R, Mafarja M (2018) Training neural networks using salp swarm algorithm for pattern classification. ICFNDS’18, Amman, Jordan

  31. Valian E, Mohanna S, Tavakoli S (2011) Improved cuckoo search algorithm for feedforward neural network training. Int J Artif Intell Appl 2(3):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mirjalili S (2015) How effective is the Grey Wolf optimizer in training multi-layer perceptions. Appl Intell 43(1):150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moallem P, Razmjooy N (2012) A multi-layer perceptron neural network trained by invasive weed optimization for potato color image segmentation. Trends Appl Sci Res 7(6):445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Karaboga D, Akay B, Ozturk C (2007) Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for training feed-forward neural networks. Proc Int Conf Model Decisions Artif Intell(MDAI ’07), Springer, Kitakyushu, Japan: 318–329

  35. Ozturk C, Karaboga D (2011) Hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for neural network training. Proc IEEE Congress Evol Comput (CEC ’11), IEEE, New Orleans, LA, USA: 84–88

  36. Griffiths EJ, Orponen P (2005) Optimization, block designs and No Free Lunch theorems. Inform Process Lett 94(2):55–61

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Fausto F, Cuevas E, Valdivia A, González A (2017) A global optimization algorithm inspired in the behavior of selfish herds. Biosystems 160:39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Araújo R d A, Oliveira ALI, Meira S (2017) A morphological neural network for binary classification problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 65:12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry to the selfish herd. J Theory Biol 31(2):295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Feng Z k, Niu W j, Cheng C t, Liao S l (2017) Hydropower system operation optimization by discrete differential dynamic programming based on orthogonal experiment design. Energy 126(1):720–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Deng L, Feng B, Zhang Y (2018) An optimization method for multi-objective and multi-factor designing of ceramic slurry: Combining orthogonal experimental design with artificial neural networks. Ceramics Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.010

  42. Ghaderpour E (2018) Constructions for orthogonal designs using signed group orthogonal designs. Discrete Math 341(1):277–285

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Tawfak L, Al-Bahrani, Jagdish C (2018) Patra. A novel orthogonal PSO algorithm based on orthogonal diagonalization. Swarm Evolution Comput 40:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu K, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Gu R (2012) Differential evolution based on ε-domination and orthogonal design method for power environmentally-friendly dispatch. Expert Syst Applic 39(4):3956–3963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Juan D, Yang, Man-Ni, Yang, Shi-Fang (2016) Correlations and optimization of a heat exchanger with offset fins by genetic algorithm combining orthogonal design. Appl Thermal Eng 107(25):1091–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Villanueva J (2008) Kolmogorov theorem revisited. J Differ Equations 244(9):2251–2276

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Samet H, Hashemi F, Ghanbari T (2015) Minimum non detection zone for islanding detection using an optimal Artificial Neural Network algorithm based on PSO. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yeh I-C, Yang K-J, Ting T-M (2009) Knowledge discovery on RFM model using Bernoulli sequence. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5866–5871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Siegler RS (1976) Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognit Psychol 8(4):481–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Blake CL, Merz CJ (1998) UCI repository of machine learning databases. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets.html. Accessed 20 May 2018

  51. Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugenics 7(Part 2):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Niknam T, Olamaie J, Amiri B (2008) A hybrid evolutionary algorithm based on ACO and SA for cluster analysis. J Appl Sci 8(15):2695–2702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Derrac J, Gracie S, Molina D, Herrera F (2011) A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 1:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. This article has been awarded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61170035, 61272420, 81674099), the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (30916011328, 30918015103), and Nanjing Science and Technology Development Plan Project (201805036).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, Jiangsu, China

    Ruxin Zhao, Yongli Wang, Peng Hu, Hamed Jelodar, Chi Yuan, YanChao Li, Isma Masood & Mahdi Rabbani

Authors
  1. Ruxin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yongli Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peng Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hamed Jelodar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chi Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. YanChao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Isma Masood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mahdi Rabbani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ruxin Zhao or Yongli Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, R., Wang, Y., Hu, P. et al. Selfish herds optimization algorithm with orthogonal design and information update for training multi-layer perceptron neural network. Appl Intell 49, 2339–2381 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1373-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1373-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation