Data mining-based methods for fault isolation with validated FMEA model ranking

1. Chen HC Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Training Manual, Personal Communication, Hen Technology Inc, USA

2. Zaluski M, Japkowicz N, Matwin S (2003) Case authoring from text and historical experiences. In: Proceedings of the sixteenth canadian conference on artificial intelligence (AI2003)

3. Genovesi A, Harmand J, Steyer J-P (2000) Integrated fault detection and isolation: Application tyo a Winery’s wasterwater treat,emt plant. Appl Intell 13(1):59–76

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Bahrampour S, Moshiri B, Salahshoor K (2011) Weighted and constrained possibilistic C-means clustering for online fault detection and isolation. Appl Intell 35(2):269–284

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Cholette ME, Liu J, Djurdjanovic D, Marko KA (2012) Monitoring of complex systems of interacting dynamic systems. Appl Intell 37(1):60–79

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Mengshoel O, et al. (Sep. 2010) Probabilistic model-based diagnosis: An electrical power system case study. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Humans 40(5):874–885

7. Yang C, Létourneau S, Zaluski M, Scarlett E (2010) APU FMEA validation and its application to fault identification. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conference & computer and information in engineering conference, IDETC/CIE 2010, Montreal, Canada

8. Yang C, Létourneau S, Scarlett E, Zaluski M (2009) APU FMEA validation using operation and maintenance data. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of the prognostics and health management society, San Diego, CA, USA

9. Sellappan N, Sivasubramanian R (February 2008) Modified method for evaluation of risk priority number in design FMEA. Icfai J Oper Manag 7(1):43–52

10. Létourneau S, Yang C, Drummond C, Scarlett E, Valdes J, Zaluski M (April 2005) A domain independent data mining methodology for prognostics. In: Proceedings of the 59th meeting of the society for machine failure prevention technology, MFPT ’05, Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA

11. Yang C, Létourneau S (2005) Learning to predict train wheel failures. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD2005), Chicago, USA, pp 516–525

12. Létourneau S, Famili A F, Matwin S (1999) Data mining for prediction of aircraft component replacement. IEEE Intell Syst Appl 14(6):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Hall M (A 2000) Correlation-based feature selection for discrete and numeric class machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on machine learning, pp 359–366

14. Kira K, Rendell (1992) A practical approach to feature selection. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on machine learning, pp 249–256

15. Yang C, Létourneau S (2009) Two-stage classifications for improving time-to-failure estimates: A case study in prognostic of train wheels. Int J Appl Intell 31(3):255–266

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

16. Japkowicz N, Shah M (2011) Evaluation of learning algorithms, a classification perspective. Cambridge University Press

17. Provost F, Fawcett T (1997) Analysis and visualization of classifier performance: Combination under imprecise class and cost distributions. In: Proceedings of international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD1997)

18. Fawcett T (2003) ROC Graphs: Notes and practical considerations for data mining researchers, Technical report, Intelligent Enterprise Technologies Laboratory, HP

19. Flach P The Many Faces of ROC Analysis in Machine Learning, ICML’04 tutorial. http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/%7Eflach/ICML04tutorial/

20. Flach P The Geometry of ROC space: Understanding machine learning metrics through ROC isometrics

21. Bradley A (1997) The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recogn 30:1145–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Huang J, Ling C (2005) Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(3):299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Drummond C, Holte R (2004) What ROC curve can’t do (and cost curve can),. In: ECAI workshop on ROC analysis in artificial intelligence

24. Zheng Z, Padmanabhan B, et al. (2004) A DEA approach for model combination

25. Caruana R, Niculescu-Mizil A (2006) An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning (ICML2006)

26. Caruana R, Niculescu-Mizil A (2004) Data mining in metric space: An empirical analysis of supervised learning performance criteria. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD2004), Seattle, Washington, USA, pp 69–78

27. Yang C, Zou Y, Liu J, Mulligan KR (2014) Predictive model evaluation for PHM. Int J Prognostics Health Manag 5(2)

28. Elkan C (2001) The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. Proceedings of the 7^th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI 2001), Seattle, USA

Download references