Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A deep network solution for intelligent fault detection in analog circuit

  • Published:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automatic fault diagnosis in analog electronic circuits is one of the interesting and important cases for researchers of this field that has gained substantial improvements in recent decades. Fault detection issue could be transferred into a classification problem. In this paper, a new fault detection method is proposed based on deep Convolution Neural Network (CNN). We used the real part of Power Spectrum Density (PSD) of faulty signals as the input images of CNN. The main reason for this is extracting microstructure features among signals by using PSD which result in a better discrimination amongst wide range of faults. Our method is evaluated by two benchmark circuits. The superior performance of our method is proved by simulation results and compared with other state of arts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bandler, J. W., & Salama, A. E. (1985). Fault diagnosis of analog circuits. Proceedings of the IEEE, 73(8), 1279–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Catelani, M., & Fort, A. (2000). Fault diagnosis of electronic analog circuits using a radial basis function network classifier. Measurement, 28(3), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng, Y., He, Y., & Sun, Y. Fault diagnosis of analog circuits with tolerances using artificial neural networks. In IEEE APCCAS 2000. 2000 IEEE Asia-Pacific conference on circuits and systems. Electronic communication systems. (Cat. No. 00EX394), 2000 (pp. 292–295).

  4. Guo, Z., & Savir, J. (2004). Analog circuit test using transfer function coefficient estimates. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 87(3), 642–646.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Isermann, R. (2006). Fault-diagnosis systems: an introduction from fault detection to fault tolerance: Springer, Berlin

  6. Kumar, A., & Singh, A. (2013). Fuzzy classifier for fault diagnosis in analog electronic circuits. ISA Transactions, 52(6), 816–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, Z., Liu, T., Han, J., Bu, S., Tang, X., & Pecht, M. (2016). Signal model-based fault coding for diagnostics and prognostics of analog electronic circuits. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(1), 605–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sindia, S., Singh, V., & Agrawal, V. D. Multi-tone testing of linear and nonlinear analog circuits using polynomial coefficients. In IEEE 2009 Asian test symposium, 2009 (pp. 63–68).

  9. Sindia, S., Singh, V., & Agrawal, V. D. Polynomial coefficient based DC testing of non-linear analog circuits. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM creat lakes symposium on VLSI, 2009 (pp. 69–74).

  10. Sobhani-Tehrani, E., & Khorasani, K. (2009). Fault diagnosis of nonlinear systems using a hybrid approach (Vol. 383). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Yi-Chuang, S. (2008). Test and diagnosis of analogue, mixed—signal and RF integrated circuits. London, UK: Institution of Engineering and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kedadouche, M., Thomas, M., & Tahan, A. (2016). A comparative study between empirical wavelet transforms and empirical mode decomposition methods: application to bearing defect diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 81, 88–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao, Y., & Feng, L. (2012). A novel neural-network approach of analog fault diagnosis based on kernel discriminant analysis and particle swarm optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 12(2), 904–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, D., Wang, Y., Cui, J., Kong, D., & Luo, H. A novel approach for analog fault diagnosis based on LMD decomposition and reconstruction. In 2016 IEEE prognostics and system health management conference (PHM-Chengdu), 2016 (pp. 1–5).

  15. Fanni, A., Giua, A., Marchesi, M., & Montisci, A. (1999). A neural network diagnosis approach for analog circuits. Applied Intelligence, 11(2), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hou, Q.-J., & Wang, H.-L. (2009). Method of fault feature extraction for analog circuits based on EMD. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 31(6), 1525–1528.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, C., He, Y., Yuan, L., He, W., Xiang, S., & Li, Z. (2016). A novel approach for diagnosis of analog circuit fault by using GMKL-SVM and PSO. Journal of Electronic Testing, 32(5), 531–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiong, J., Tian, S., Yang, C., & Liu, C. (2016). A novel method of failure sample selection for electrical systems using ant colony optimization. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2016, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, P., & Yang, S. (2005). A new diagnosis approach for handling tolerance in analog and mixed-signal circuits by using fuzzy math. IEEE transactions on circuits and systems I: regular papers, 52(10), 2118–2127.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu, Z., Xiao, M., Zhang, L., Liu, S., & Ge, Y. (2016). Mahalanobis distance based approach for anomaly detection of analog filters using frequency features and Parzen window density estimation. Journal of Electronic Testing, 32(6), 681–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dorj, E., Chen, C., & Pecht, M. A Bayesian Hidden Markov Model-based approach for anomaly detection in electronic systems. In 2013 IEEE aerospace conference, 2013 (pp. 1–10).

  22. Ma, Q., He, Y., & Zhou, F. (2016). A new decision tree approach of support vector machine for analog circuit fault diagnosis. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 88(3), 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shokrolahi, S. M., & Kazempour, A. T. N. (2019). A novel approach for fault detection of analog circuit by using improved EEMD. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 98(3), 527–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., & Dudley, J. T. (2017). Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Briefings In bioinformatics, 19(6), 1236–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheikhzadeh, F., Ward, R. K., van Niekerk, D., & Guillaud, M. (2018). Automatic labeling of molecular biomarkers of immunohistochemistry images using fully convolutional networks. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0190783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Moslem Shokrolahi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shokrolahi, S.M., Karimiziarani, M. A deep network solution for intelligent fault detection in analog circuit. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 107, 597–604 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-020-01732-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-020-01732-8

Keywords

Navigation