Abstract
A medical test to diagnose a disease is often used to distinguish between healthy and diseased individuals, where early, accurate and reliable diagnosis can decrease morbidity and mortality rates of disease. An optimal cut-off point is required to discriminate healthy from diseased individuals, and a corresponding biomarker value is used to assess the accuracy and robustness whether a person is healthy (negative) or diseased (positive). If the biomarker values, that are greater than or equal to this cut-off value, are considered positive, otherwise they are negative. Several indices such as Youden index, Euclidean index, product of sensitivity and specificity have been used in clinical practices but their reliability of performance are not well understood by clinicians. This study uses Taguchi quality loss function to compare the choice of methods in determining optimal cut-off points for the diagnostic tests. The results illustrate that the variance of diseased populations is less than the variance of healthy populations and the loss coefficient of false negative results is greater than loss coefficient of the false positive results, the Youden index has a better performance; in other cases, the Euclidean index is a better measure. This paper proposes a Taguchi index based on the quality loss function can measure the diagnostic accuracy for differences in the sensitivity and specificity by minimizing the cost of false positive and false negative results. The proposed index can assess diagnostic tests and offer perfect discrimination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fluss, R., Faraggi, D., & Reiser, B. (2005). Estimation of the Youden index and it’s associated cutoff point. Biometrical Journal, 47(4), 458–472.
Hajian-Tilaki, K. (2017). The choice of methods in determining the optimal cut-off value for quantitative diagnostic test evaluation. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 27(8), 2374–2383.
Liu, X. (2012). Classification accuracy and cut point selection. Statistics in Medicine, 31(23), 2676–2686.
Nakas, C. T., Alonzo, T. A., & Yiannoutsos, C. T. (2010). Accuracy and cut-off point selection in three-class classification problems using a generalization of the Youden index. Statistics in Medicine, 29(28), 2946–2955.
Schisterman, E. F., & Perkins, N. (2007). Confidence intervals for the Youden index and the corresponding optimal cut-point. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 36(3), 549–563.
Schisterman, E. F., Perkins, N., Liu, A., & Bondell, H. (2005). Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology, 16(1), 73–81.
Skaltsa, K., Jover, L., & Carrasco, J. L. (2010). Estimation of the diagnostic threshold accounting for decision costs and sampling uncertainty. Biometrical Journal, 52(5), 676–697.
Stefan, M., Panduru, N. M., & Ion, D. A. (2011). Estimation of Youden index and its associated optimal cut-point when the parameters of gamma biomarkers are estimated by the method of moments. Proceedings of the Romanian Academy, Series A, 12(4), 269–276. https://acad.ro/sectii2002/proceedings/doc2011-4/01-Stefan.pdf.
Taguchi, G. (1992). Taguchi methods: Research and development. Dearborn, MI: American Suppliers Institute.
Taner, M. T., & Antony, J. (2000). The assessment of quality in medical diagnostic tests: A comparison of ROC/Youden and Taguchi methods. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 13(7), 300–307.
Taner, M. T., & Sezen, B. (2009a). An assessment of diagnostic efficiency by Taguchi/DEA methods. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 22(1), 93–98.
Taner, M. T., & Sezen, B. (2009b). Modelling of Taguchi’s signal-to-noise ratios for healthcare. Journal Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 20(5), 483–495.
Taner, M. T., Sezen, B., & Atwat, K. (2013). A comparison of two diagnostic performance measures: Signal-to-noise ratio versus partial area under receiver operating characteristic curve. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 26(2), 109–117.
Wu, F.-C., Wang, H.-M., & Fan, T.-Y. (2010). Quality design of Taguchi’s digital dynamic systems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering—Applications and Practice, 16(5), 405–416.
Wu, P.-C., & Wu, F.-C. (2017). A hybrid indicator of Youden index and Taguchi loss function to determine the diagnostic efficiency. In AETMS 2017 proceedings: 4th International conference on advanced education technology and management science, (pp. 278–282).
Youden, W. J. (1950). Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 3(1), 32–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, FC., Chuang, T.C., Chou, FD. et al. Evaluating the reliability of diagnostic performance indices by using Taguchi quality loss function. Ann Oper Res 311, 437–449 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03512-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03512-8