Does CSR matter? Influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate performance in the creative industry

• ACPSA. (2015). Overview of arts and cultural production. National Endowment for the Arts. https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/ADP%239-Brief1.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2016.

• AFTA. (2004). The definition of the creative industries: The standard industrial classification (SIC) codes of the nation’s art-related businesses. American for the Arts.http://www.americansforthearts.org/sites/default/files/pdf/information_services/creative_industries/creative_industries_definition_list_2006.pdf. Accessed November 8, 2015.

• Bilbao-Terol, A., Arenas-Parra, M., Cañal-Fernández, V., & Bilbao-Terol, C. (2016). Multi-criteria decision making for choosing socially responsible investment within a behavioral portfolio theory framework: A new way of investing into a crisis environment. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 549–580.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Blaug, M., & Towse, R. (2011). Cultural entrepreneurship. In R. Towse (Ed.), A handbook of cultural economics (pp. 153–157). Edward Elgar Publishing.

• Botsian, T. V. (2014). Data envelopment analysis in the CSR efficiency measurement (case study). In Proceeding of international conference “Prospects for the accounting, control and analysis in the context of European integration” (Vol. 201). Odessa (Ukraine).

• Bowlin, W. F. (1998). Measuring performance: An introduction to data envelopment analysis (DEA). The Journal of Cost Analysis, 15(2), 3–27.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–1343.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Camelo-Ordaz, C., Fernández-Alles, M., Ruiz-Navarro, J., & Sousa-Ginel, E. (2012). The intrapreneur and innovation in creative firms. International Small Business Journal, 30(5), 513–535.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–506.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chaston, I., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2012). Entrepreneurial cognition, entrepreneurial orientation and firm capability in the creative industries. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 415–432.

  Google Scholar 

• Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2003). DEA models for identifying critical performance measures. Annals of Operations Research, 124(1–4), 225–244.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 35(3), 291–311.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clarkson, M. B. A. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Department for Cultural, Media and Sport (DCMS). (1998). Creative industries mapping document 1998 (p. 10). London: DCMS.

• Fan, Y., Yuan, X., & Qin, J. (2013). Research on China’s regional cultural industries’ efficiency based on factor analysis and BCC and super efficiency model. International Business Research, 6(7), 22–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50(1), 65–70.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549–2568.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class, and how it is transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth a meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society, 36(3), 221–249.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Galbreath, J., & Shum, P. (2012). Do customer satisfaction and reputation mediate the CSR-FP Link? Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), 211–229.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Galloway, S., & Dunlop, S. (2007). A critique of definitions of the cultural and creative industries in public policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(1), 17–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 107–126.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garnham, N. (2005). From cultural to creative industries: An analysis of the implications of the “creative industries” approach to arts and media policy making in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 15–29.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237–250.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gössling, T., & Vocht, C. (2007). Social role conception and CSR policy success. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 363–372.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046.

  Google Scholar 

• Hadida, A. L. (2015). Performance in the creative industries. In C. Jones, M. Lorenzen & J. Sapsed (Eds.), The oxford handbook of creative industries (pp. 219–225). Oxford University Press.

• Halim, M. A. S. A., Muda, S., & Amin, W. A. A. W. M. (2011). The measurement of entrepreneurial personality and business performance in Terengganu creative industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 183–192.

  Google Scholar 

• Hung, S. W., He, D. S., & Lu, W. M. (2014). Evaluating the dynamic performances of business groups from the carry-over perspective: A case study of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Omega, 46, 1–10.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategy Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Parkman, I. D., Holloway, S. S., & Sebastiao, H. (2012). Creative industries: Aligning entrepreneurial orientation and innovation capacity. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 95–114.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jiang, H. C., & Liu, S. C. (2016). Application of DEA in the value optimization study of China listed media companies. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management 2015 (pp. 761–769). Atlantis Press.

• Kang, C., Germann, F., & Grewal, R. (2016). Washing away your sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility, and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 59–79.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kiessling, T., Isaksson, L., & Yasar, B. (2015). Market orientation and CSR: Performance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 269–284.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility—Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New Jersey: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Leslie, D., & Rantisi, N. M. (2011). Creativity and place in the evolution of a cultural industry the case of Cirque du Soleil. Urban Studies, 48(9), 1771–1787.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lo, S. F. (2010) Performance evaluation for sustainable business: a profitability and marketability framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(6), 311–319.

• Lopez, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285–300.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lu, W. M., Wang, W. K., & Kweh, Q. L. (2014). Intellectual capital and performance in the Chinese life insurance industry. Omega, 42(1), 65–74.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Markusen, A., Wassal, G. H., DeNatale, D., & Cohen, R. (2008). Defining the creative economic: Industry and occupational approaches. Economic Development Quarterly, 22(1), 24–45.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Martinaitytė, E., & Kregždaitė, R. (2015). The factors of creative industries development in nowadays stage. Economics and Sociology, 8(1), 55–70.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mattingly, J. E. (2015). Corporate social performance: A review of Empirical research examining the corporation–society relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data. Business and Society, doi:10.1177/0007650315585761.

• McGranahan, D. A., Wojan, T. R., & Lambert, D. M. (2010). The rural growth trifecta: Outdoor amenities, creative class and entrepreneurial context. Journal of Economic Geography. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq007.

• McWilliams, A., Parhankangas, A., Coupet, J., Welch, E., & Barnum, D. T. (2016). Strategic decision making for the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 193–204.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Medina-Borja, A., & Triantis, K. (2014). Modeling social service performance: A four-stage DEA approach to evaluate fundraising efficiency, capacity building, service quality, and effectiveness in the non-profit sector. Annals of Operation Research, 221(1), 285–307.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Melo, T., & Garrido-Morgado, A. (2012). Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(1), 11–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Menger, P. M. (1999). Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 541–574.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Napier, N. K., & Nilsson, M. (2006). The development of creative capabilities in and out of creative organizations: Three case studies. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(3), 268–278.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peltoniemi, M. (2015). Cultural industries: Product-Market characteristics, management challenges and industry dynamics. International Journal of Management Review, 17(1), 41–68.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pratt, A. C., & Jeffcutt, P. (Eds.). (2009). Creativity, innovation in the cultural economy. New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sauter-Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Potts, J. (2011). Creative industries and economic evolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Rogerson, P. A. (2001). Statistical methods for geography. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270–1288.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sun, L., & Stuebs, M. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and firm productivity: Evidence from the chemical industry in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 251–263.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility: A review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 343–364.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thronsby, D., & Throsby, C. D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Throsby, D. (2010). The economics of culture policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(1), 498–509.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3), 145–156.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• UNCTAD. (2015). Creative economy outlook and country profiles: Trends in international trade in creative industries. United Nation Conference on Trade and Development. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webditcted2016d5_en.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2016.

• UNESCO. (2013). Creative economic report 2013: Special edition. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), NY, and United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris. http://www.unesco.org/culture/pdf/creative-economy-report-2013-en.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2016.

• Vithessonthi, C., & Tongurai, J. (2015). The effect of leverage on performance: Domestically-oriented versus internationally-oriented firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 34, 265–280.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109(1), 5–42.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., & Lai, H. W. (2014). Does social corporate responsibility influence the corporate performance of the U.S. telecommunication industry? Telecommunications Policy, 38(7), 580–591.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Xidonas, P., Doukas, H., Mavrotas, G., & Pechak, O. (2016). Environmental corporate responsibility for investments evaluation: An alternative multi-objective programming model. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 395–413.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yang, Y., Lin, M., Lei, H., & Cai, D. (2014). China creative industry development efficiency assessment. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on management science and engineering management (pp. 521–535). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

• Zeng, S., Hu, M., & Su, B. (2016). Research on investment efficiency and policy recommendations for the culture industry of China based on a three-stage DEA. Sustainability, 8(4), 324.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references