Doing good by doing well: a MCDM framework for evaluating corporate social responsibility attractiveness

• Bakker, F., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society, 44, 283–317.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burillo, P., & Bustince, H. (1996). Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 305–316.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Calabrese, A., Costa, R., & Rosati, F. (2015). A feedback-based model for CSR assessment and materiality analysis. Accounting Forum, 39(4), 312–327.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 248–264.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Canós, L., & Liern, V. (2008). Soft computing-based aggregation methods for human resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 669–681.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carroll, A. B. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, 33–42.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cochran, P. (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50, 449–454.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Costa, R., & Menichini, T. (2015). A multidimensional approach for CSR assessment: The importance of the stakeholder perception. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(1), 150–161.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1–13.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1980). Systems of linear fuzzy constraints. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 3, 31–48.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• García-Melón, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Gómez-Navarro, T., Méndez-Rodríguez, P .(2016). Assessing mutual funds’ corporate social responsibility: a multistakeholder-AHP based methodology. Annals of Operations Research. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2132-5.

• Gil-Aluja, J. (1998). The interactive management of human resources in uncertainty. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Hsu, C.-W., Lee, W. H., & Chao, W. C. (2013). Materiality analysis model in sustainability reporting: A case study at lite-on technology corporation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 142–151.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods. Berlin: Springer.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Liern, V., Méndez-Rodríguez, P., & Pérez-Gladish, B. (2015). A soft computing approach for ranking firms based on experts’ valuation of corporate social responsibility. Applied Mathematics and Information Science, 9(3), 1113–1122.

  Google Scholar 

• McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Milani, S., Shanian, A., Madoliat, R., & Nemes, J. A. (2005). The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: A case study in gear material selection. Industrial Applications, 29, 312–318.

  Google Scholar 

• Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business and Society, 36, 419–429.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ramík, J., & Rímánek, J. (1985). Inequality relation between fuzzy numbers and its use in fuzzy optimization. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 16, 123–138.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Sambuc, R.: Functions \(\upphi \)-flous (1976). Aplication a l’aide au diagnostic en pathologie thyroıdienne, Ph. D. Thesis, Université de Marseille, France.

• Schwartz, M. S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: An ethical approach. Calgary: Broadview Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Us SIF (2014). Report on sustainable and socially responsible investing trends in the United States. Washington, DC: US SIF Foundation.

Download references