Abstract
The present study evaluated profitability of some models of cocoa farms and analyzed the relationship between cocoa yield, income and carbon stored in traditional cocoa agroforests to discuss implications of cocoa intensification on carbon emissions in Cameroun. Surveys on establishment, management practices and marketing were conducted in 49 cocoa farms along a gradient of population density, forest cover and market access, and combined with data on carbon stock and trees species inventories. Traditional cocoa farms were stratified according to rehabilitation practices of farms (no rehabilitation, replacing dead/senescent cocoa plants in the farm or extending the farm by adding young plants around the old plots). Results showed that traditional cocoa agroforests are managed under high trees shade and present high carbon stock levels (average of 64 trees/ha of large tree diameter and about 94 tonC/ha). Management is based on an intensive use of family labor and there is little consistency in the use of inputs (as planting material, fertilizers and pesticides). Profitability analysis using net present value indicated that farms rehabilitated by replacement of cocoa trees were more profitable. Intensified systems are more profitable at the various discount rates considered, with up to 50 % cocoa yield increase but with less tree shade (about 40 trees/ha). Structural and productive parameters of the system showed a high variability and it was not possible to assess a clear relationship between carbon stock, yield, and incomes to clearly delineate tradeoffs. Under persistent poverty conditions and with no major intervention to support inputs purchase, suitable designs for intensification pathways should focus on good practices such as shade management, quality of associated trees, use of improved planting materials released by the research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alternative to Slash and Burn (2000) Summary report and synthesis of phase II in Cameroon. ASB coordination office, ICRAF Nairobi, Kenya, p 72
Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure J-P, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Rie´ra B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Ecosyst Ecol Oecol 145:87–99. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x
Djomo AN, Ibrahima A, Saborowski J, Gravenhort G (2010) Allometric equations for biomass estimations in Cameroon and pan moist tropical equations including biomass data from Africa. For EcolManag 260:1873–1885. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article. pii/S0378112710004937
Eboutou LY, Degrande A, JazaFolefack, Kamajou F (2010) More thanchocolate: diversifyingcocoaagroforests for higherprofitability in Cameroon. World Agroforestry Centre. www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/publications/PDFs?PO10198.PDF
FAO (2002) Etude de cas d’aménagement forestier exemplaire en Afrique centrale: les systèmes agroforestiers cacaoyers, Cameroun. Par Denis J. Sonwa, octobre 2002. Document de travail FM/12F. Service de la mise en valeur des ressources forestières, Division des ressources forestières. FAO, Rome (non publié)
Forest & Landscape Denmark Horsholm Sweden, Bissuela DHB, Missoup AD, Vidal S (2009) Biodiversity conservation, Ecosystem Functioning, and economic incentives under cocoa agroforestry intensification. Conserv Biol 23(5):1176–1184
Gockowski J, Sonwa D (2010) Cocoa intensification scenarios and their predicted impact on CO2 emissions, biodiversity conservation, and rural livelihoods in the guinea rain forest of West Africa. Environmental Management. http://www.springerlink.com/content/121xr71482210109/
Gockowski J, Tchatat M, Dondjang JP, Hietet G, Fouda T (2010) An empirical analysis of the biodiversity and economic returns to cocoa agroforests in Southern Cameroon. J Sustain For 29:638–670 ISSN: 1054–9811
Hairiah K, Dewi S, Agus F, Velarde S, Ekadinata A, Rahayu S, van Noordwijk M (2011). Measuring carbon stocks across land use systems: a manual. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), SEA Regional Office, p 154
Jagoret P, Ngogue HT, Bouambi E, Battini J-L, Nyassé S (2009) Diversification des exploitations agricoles à base de cacaoyer au Centre Cameroun : mythe ou réalité? Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 13(2):271–280
Jagoret P, Michel-Dounias I, Malézieux E (2011) Long-term dynamics of cocoa agroforests: a case study in central Cameroon. Agrofor Syst 81:267–278
Kotto Same JPL, Woomer M, Appolinaire M, Zapfack L (1997) Carbon dynamics in slash and burn agriculture and land use alternatives in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. Agr Ecosyst Env 65(3):245–256 1205
Letouzey R (1985) Carte phytogéographique du Cameroun. Institut de la recherche agronomique (Herbier national) - Yaoundé - Cameroun; Institut de la Carte internationale de la végétation - Toulouse - France
MINADER (2009) Fiche Technico-Economique sur la fertilisation du Cacaoyer. p 11 www.fertilizerscameroon.cm
Nolte C, Kotto-Same J, Moukam A, Thenkabail P.S, Weise S.F, Zapfack L (2001) Land use characterization and estimation of carbon stock in the alternative to slash and burn benchmark area in Cameroon. Resource and crops management research Monograph No. 28. IITA, Ibadan
Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Mas A, Soto Pinto L (2005) Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification. Ecol Econ 54:435–446
Programme des Nations Unies pour l’Environnement. Avril (2009) Evaluation intégrée des politiques liées au commerce et les implications en termes de diversité biologique dans le secteur agricole en République du Cameroun: le secteur cacao
Robiglio V, Lescuyer G, Curetti PO (2013) From farmers to loggers: the role of shifting cultivation landscapes in timber production in Cameroon. Small-Scale For 12(1):67–85
Schoeneberger MM (2009) Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. USDA Forest Service/UNL Faculty Publications. Paper 2. University of Nebraska—Lincoln. Agrofor Syst doi 10.1007/s10457-008-9123-8
Smith P (2004) Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and global context. Eur J Agron 20(3):229–236
Société de Développement du Cacao—SODECAO (2011) Comment créer une cacaoyère moderne http://www.sodecao.cm/index.php/Cacaoculture/comment-creer-une-cacaoyere-moderne.html
Somarriba E, Cerda R, Orozco L, Cifuentes M, Dávila H, Espin T, Mavisoy H, Ávila G, Alvarado E, Poveda V, Astorga C, Say E, Deheuvels O (2013) Carbon stocks and cocoa yields in agroforestry systems of Central America. Agric Ecosyst Environ 173(2013):46–57
Sonwa D 2004 Biomass management and diversification within cocoa agroforests in the humid forest zone of Southern Cameroon. PhD. thesis. Faculty of Agriculture. University of Bonn. Germany. Cuvillier Verlag Goettingen, p 112
Sonwa DJ, Weise SF, Ndoye O, et Jansens MJJ (2001) Initiatives endogènes d’intensification et de diversification à l’intérieur des agroforêts-cacao au Sud-Cameroun: leçons pour une foresterie participative dans les systèmes à base de cultures pérennes en Afrique centrale et de l’Ouest. Deuxième atelier international sur la foresterie participative en Afrique. Préparer l’avenir: des conditions de vie durables en milieu rural grâce à la gestion participative des ressources forestières. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/FAO/006/y4807b/Y4807B42.pdf
Sonwa DJ, Weise SF, Coulibaly ON (2009) Contribution of traditional knowledge developed by farmers to control pests and diseases in cocoa agroforests in Southern Cameroon. IUFRO World Ser 23:14–20
Stratégie de Développement du Secteur Rural (2005) Volet agriculture et développement rural. Version révisée non publiée, MINADER
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Magne, A.N., Nonga, N.E., Yemefack, M. et al. Profitability and implications of cocoa intensification on carbon emissions in Southern Cameroun. Agroforest Syst 88, 1133–1142 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9715-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9715-4