Abstract
During robotic cochlear implantation a drill trajectory often passes at submillimeter distances from the facial nerve due to close lying critical anatomy of the temporal bone. Additional intraoperative safety mechanisms are thus required to ensure preservation of this vital structure in case of unexpected navigation system error. Electromyography based nerve monitoring is widely used to aid surgeons in localizing vital nerve structures at risk of injury during surgery. However, state of the art neuromonitoring systems, are unable to discriminate facial nerve proximity within submillimeter ranges. Previous work demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing combinations of monopolar and bipolar stimulation threshold measurements to discretize facial nerve proximity with greater sensitivity and specificity, enabling discrimination between safe (> 0.4 mm) and unsafe (< 0.1 mm) trajectories during robotic cochlear implantation (in vivo animal model). Herein, initial clinical validation of the determined stimulation protocol and nerve proximity analysis integrated into an image guided system for safety measurement is presented. Stimulation thresholds and corresponding nerve proximity values previously determined from an animal model have been validated in a first-in-man clinical trial of robotic cochlear implantation. Measurements performed automatically at preoperatively defined distances from the facial nerve were used to determine safety of the drill trajectory intraoperatively. The presented system and automated analysis correctly determined sufficient safety distance margins (> 0.4 mm) to the facial nerve in all cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anso, J., K. Gerber, S. Weber, K. Thorwarth, A. Chacko, and J. Patscheider. Intervention Device with Electrodes, P5324EP00, 2018.
Anso, J., et al. Electrical impedance to assess facial nerve proximity during robotic cochlear implantation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1–1, 2018.
Ansó, J., et al. A Neuromonitoring approach to facial nerve preservation during image-guided robotic cochlear implantation. Otol. Neurotol. 37(1):89–98, 2016.
Ansó, J., et al. Feasibility of using EMG for early detection of the facial nerve during robotic direct cochlear access. Otol. Neurotol. 35(3):545–554, 2014.
Balmer, T. W., et al. In-vivo electrical impedance measurement in mastoid bone. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(4):1122–1132, 2017.
Bell, B., et al. In vitro accuracy evaluation of image-guided robot system for direct cochlear access. Otol. Neurotol. 34:1284–1290, 2013.
Bernardeschi, D., et al. Continuous facial nerve stimulating burr for otologic surgeries. Otol. Neurotol. 32(8):1347–1351, 2011.
Caversaccio, M., et al. Robotic cochlear implantation: surgical procedure and first clinical experience. Acta Otolaryngol. 137(4):447–454, 2017.
Choung, Y. H., K. Park, M. J. Cho, P. H. Choung, Y. R. Shin, and H. Kahng. Systematic facial nerve monitoring in middle ear and mastoid surgeries: ‘surgical dehiscence’ and ‘electrical dehiscence’. Otolaryngoly 135(6):872–876, 2006.
Gerber, N., B. Bell, K. Gavaghan, C. Weisstanner, M. D. Caversaccio, and S. Weber. Surgical planning tool for robotically assisted hearing aid implantation. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 9(1):11–20, 2014.
Gerber, N., et al. High accuracy patient-to-image registration for the facilitation of image guided robotic microsurgery on the head. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(4):960–968, 2013.
Heman-Ackah, S. E., S. Gupta, and A. K. Lalwani. Is facial nerve integrity monitoring of value in chronic ear surgery? Laryngoscope 123(1):2–3, 2013.
Holland, N. R. Intraoperative electromyography. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 19(5):444–453, 2002.
Hormes, J., and J. Chappuis. Monitoring of lumbosacral nerve roots during spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 18(14):2059–2062, 1993.
Kartush, J. M., J. K. Niparko, S. C. Bledsoe, M. D. Graham, and J. L. Kemink. Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring: a comparison of stimulating electrodes. Laryngoscope 95(12):1536–1540, 1985.
Kim, S. M., S. H. Kim, D. W. Seo, and K. W. Lee. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: basic principles and recent update. J. Korean Med. Sci. 28(9):1261–1269, 2013.
Labadie, R. F., J. H. Noble, B. M. Dawant, R. Balachandran, O. Majdani, and J. M. Fitzpatrick. Clinical validation of percutaneous cochlear implant surgery: initial report. Laryngoscope 118(6):1031–1039, 2008.
Labadie, R. F., et al. Minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation surgery: first report of clinical implementation. Laryngoscope 124(8):1915–1922, 2014.
Owen, J., et al. The use of mechanically elicited electromyograms to protect nerve roots during surgery for spinal degeneration. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 19(15):1704–1710, 1994.
Rathgeb, C., et al. The accuracy of image based safety analysis for robotic cochlear implantation. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg.
Roland, A. P. S., C. Editor, and A. D. Meyers. Principles of Electrophysiologic Monitoring, pp. 1–9, 2012.
Ross, B. G., G. Fradet, and J. M. Nedzelski. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 114(3):380–386, 1996.
Silverstein, H., and S. Rosenberg. Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am. 24(3):709–725, 1991.
Vianna, M., et al. Differences in the diameter of facial nerve and facial canal in bell’s palsy—a 3-dimensional temporal bone study. Otol. Neurotol. 35(3):514–518, 2014.
Weber, S., et al. Instrument flight to the inner ear. Sci. Robot. 2(4):eaal4916, 2017.
Williamson, T., et al. Population statistics approach for safety assessment in robotic cochlear implantation. Otol. Neurotol. 38(5):759–764, 2017.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Laetitia Racz-Perroud, Fabian Zobrist and Marco Matulic (CAScination AG) for technical support. The authors thank Dr. Thilo Krüger and Celine Wegner (inomed GmbH) for technical support. Dr. Thomas Wyss-Balmer contributed with electrical modeling of the presented stimulation probe. Surgical photographs are attributed to Gianni Pauciello.
Conflict of interest
This work was supported by the Swiss Commission for technology and innovation (Project MIRACI 17618.1), the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project 205321_176007), by MED-EL GmbH (Innsbruck, Austria) and CAScination AG (Bern, Switzerland).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Cameron N. Riviere oversaw the review of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ansó, J., Scheidegger, O., Wimmer, W. et al. Neuromonitoring During Robotic Cochlear Implantation: Initial Clinical Experience. Ann Biomed Eng 46, 1568–1581 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2094-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2094-7