Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring strategies for local landslide early warning systems

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 December 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

The main aim of this study is the description and the analysis of the monitoring strategies implemented within local landslide early warning systems (Lo-LEWS) operational all around the world. Relevant information on 29 Lo-LEWS have been retrieved from peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals and proceedings of technical conferences, books, reports, and institutional web pages. The first part of the paper describes the characteristics of these early warning systems considering their different components. The main characteristics of each system are summarized using tables with the aim of providing easily accessible information for technicians, experts, and stakeholders involved in the design and operation of Lo-LEWSs. The second part of the paper describes the monitoring networks adopted within the considered systems. Monitoring strategies are classified in terms of monitored activities and methods detailing the parameters and instruments adopted. The latter are classified as a function of the type of landslide being monitored. The discussion focuses on issues relevant for early warning, including appropriateness of the measurements, redundancy of monitoring methods, data analysis, and performance. Moreover, a description of the most used monitoring parameters and instruments for issuing warnings is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 05 December 2018

    The original version of this article was revised: Unconverted data in Figure 3; Tables 1 and 2 caption has error in both PDF and XML; Table 6 needs to be organized and structured so it would be more readable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the editor, Jonathan Godt, and to the two anonymous referees for their fruitful and useful comments. The authors thank the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute for the financial contribution and for the involvement of Gaetano Pecoraro and Luca Piciullo in WP3.4-Early warning systems in the context of the project Klima 2050-Risk reduction through climate adaptation of buildings and infrastructure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Piciullo.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: Unconverted data in Figure 3; Tables 1 and 2 caption has error in both PDF and XML; Table 6 needs to be organized and structured so it would be more readable

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pecoraro, G., Calvello, M. & Piciullo, L. Monitoring strategies for local landslide early warning systems. Landslides 16, 213–231 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1068-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1068-z

Keywords

Navigation