Abstract
It has been established that the task-irrelevant orientation of an object’s graspable handle produces a stimulus–response compatibility effect, resulting in faster reaction times when the location of the response corresponds to that of the object’s handle. There is ongoing debate whether to attribute this affordance effect to motoric or to attentional components. In an attempt to reconcile these two viewpoints, we employed a novel experimental approach for investigating the relationship between attention and affordance. Using 3-D positional sound, auditory spatial attention was manipulated in order to explore its effects on affordance. Subjects were presented images of everyday graspable objects and had to respond bimanually (left or right) whether the object (featuring a leftward or rightward handle) was presented upright or upside-down. Prior to each affording object, sound localization cues were manipulated so as to orient auditory attention to the left, or to the right of the interaural axis (control). We obtained a peculiar pattern of results, which not only appears to provide support for an attention-shift account of affordance but does so in a cross-modal context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Anderson SJ, Yamagishi N, Karavia V (2002) Attentional processes link perception and action. Proc Royal Soc Lond Ser B 269:1225–1232
Buckingham G, Main JC, Carey DP (2011) Asymmetries in motor attention during a cued bimanual reaching task: left and right handers compared. Cortex 47:432–440
Cho DT, Proctor RW (2010) The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 36(4):853–861
Iani C, Baroni G, Pellicano A, Nicoletti R (2011) On the relationship between affordance and Simon effects: are the effects really independent? J Cognit Psychol 23:121–131
Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for S-R compatibility—a model and a taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253–270
Proctor RW, Vu K-PL (2006) Stimulus-response compatibility principle: data, theory, and application. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Riggio L, Iani C, Gherri E, Benatti F, Rubichi S, Nicoletti R (2008) The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. Acta Psychol 127:449–458
Rizzolatti G, Riggio L, Dascola I, Umiltà C (1987) Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25:31–40
Rubichi S, Nicoletti R, Iani C, Umiltà C (1997) The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 23:1353–1364
Simon JR, Rudell AP (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51:300–304
Spence C, Driver J (eds) (2004) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Symes E, Ellis R, Tucker M (2005) Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognit 12:1337–1360
Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 24(3):830–846
Conflict of interest
This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded entirely by ECONA, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kostov, K., Janyan, A. The role of attention in the affordance effect: can we afford to ignore it?. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 215–218 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0452-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0452-1