Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

When left feels right: asymmetry in the affordance effect

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated the existence of the so-called affordance effect (faster response when the visual affordance of a graspable object (e.g., a pan) corresponds to the response location). It has been argued that the effect is due to abstract spatial coding of the position of the handle relative to the object instead of the grasping affordance. Our experiment tested the hypothesis that the affordance effect is not caused solely by abstract spatial coding but also by specific motor activation in response to the visual affordance. We assumed that, in the case of abstract spatial codes, response location and not hand distinction would be the critical factor for producing an affordance effect. In our experiment, bi-manual crossed/uncrossed responses to left/right symbols superimposed on a picture of a pan were used. The task was to attend to the symbol and to press a corresponding left/right button. Affordances of the pan were manipulated. A three-way interaction between side of affordance (left/right), mode of response (crossed/uncrossed hands), and response–affordance correspondence (corresponding/non-corresponding) showed a correspondence effect in the right affordance condition with hands uncrossed and no correspondence effect with hands crossed. The correspondence effect was obtained in the left affordance condition across hand positions that differed only by their magnitude. Overall, the results suggest that both mechanisms (grasping affordance and spatial codes) differentially contribute to the processing of an object with a graspable handle, depending on the affordance side and response hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Buccino G, Sato M, Cattaneo L, Rodà F, Riggio L (2009) Broken affordances, broken objects: a TMS study. Neuropsychologia 47:3074–3078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham G, Main JC, Carey DP (2011) Asymmetries in motor attention during a cued bimanual reaching task: left and right handers compared. Cortex 47:432–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cho DT, Proctor RW (2011) Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37(3):737–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coren S (1993) The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footness, eyedness, and hearedness: norms for young adults. Bull Psychon Soc 31(1):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Goble DJ, Brown SH (2008) The biological and behavioral basis of upper limb asymmetries in sensorimotor performance. Neurosci Behav Rev 32:598–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H (1996) Coordination. In: Heuer H, Keele SW (eds) Handbook of perception and action: motor skills, vol 2. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 121–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes CML, Reißig P, Seegelke C (2011) Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task. Acta Psychol 138:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JC, Ward R (2002) S–R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual; affordance: time course and specificity of response activation. Vis Cogn 9(4/5):540–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor RW, Vu K-PL (2006) Stimulus-response compatibility principles. Data, theory, and application. Taylor & Francis Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-Prime user’s guide. Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24(3):830–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Ellis R (2004) Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol 116:185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vankov I, Kokinov B (2011) Embodied comparison of functional relations. In: Kokinov B, Karmiloff-Smith A, Nersessian NJ (eds) European perspectives on cognitive science. NBU Press, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded entirely by ECONA, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armina Janyan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janyan, A., Slavcheva, G.V. When left feels right: asymmetry in the affordance effect. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 199–202 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0450-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0450-3

Keywords

Navigation