Abstract
The pseudorange observation of the BeiDou satellite navigation system (BDS) reveals some special errors. Except for the elevation-dependent code bias variations, we present receiver-related code biases of BDS. We have analyzed the BDS receiver-related code biases based on observations from 257 stations whose receivers are from seven different manufacturers. The results demonstrate that BDS code biases are related to receiver manufacturers and receiver models and that they can reach up to about 3.0 ns among different receiver types. Moreover, BDS receiver-related code biases are quite stable over a long period of time. There is no doubt that when mixed receiver types are used, the BDS receiver-related code biases will affect the accuracy of data processing, e.g., satellite differential code bias and satellite clock bias estimation. Thus, to correct BDS receiver-related code biases, correction models for different receiver types are established. Three experiments, including satellite clock estimation, single point positioning (SPP) and pseudorange residual analysis are carried out to validate the corrections proposed. The results prove that, with BDS receiver-related code biases corrected, the biases of satellite clock estimated by mixed receiver types are more consistent with those estimated by the same receiver types. Compared with results without code bias corrections, the average satellite clock bias decreases from 1.04 to 0.22 ns which is an improvement of about 78.8%. Moreover, the accuracy of the ionospheric-free SPP is improved by 7.3 and 10.0% on average in vertical and horizontal components, respectively. The percentage of pseudorange residuals distributed between − 0.5 and 0.5 m is improved from 49.8 to 53.2%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Chen J (1998) An integrated crustal movement monitoring network in China. In: Forsberg R, Feissel M, Dietrich R (eds) Geodesy on the move, vol 119. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Springer, Berlin
Edgar C, Czopek F, Barker B (1999) A co-operative anomaly resolution of PRN-19. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 1999, Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, September 14–17, pp 2269–2268
Geng T, Xie X, Zhao Q, Liu X, Liu J (2017) Improving BDS integer ambiguity resolution using satellite-induced code bias correction for precise orbit determination. GPS Solut 21(3):1191–1201
Gisbert JVP, Batzilis N, Risueño GL, Rubio JA (2012) GNSS payload and signal characterization using a 3 m dish antenna. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2012, Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, September 17–21, pp 347–356
Gong X, Gu S, Lou Y, Zheng F, Ge M, Liu J (2017) An efficient solution of real-time data processing for multi-GNSS network. J Geodesy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1095-x
Gu S, Lou Y, Shi C, Liu J (2015) BeiDou phase bias estimation and its application in precise point positioning with triple-frequency observable. J Geodesy 89(10):979–992
Hauschild A, Montenbruck O (2016) A study on the dependency of GNSS pseudorange biases on correlator spacing. GPS Solut 20(2):159–171
Hauschild A, Montenbruck O, Sleewaegen JM, Huisman L, Teunissen P (2012) Characterization of compass M-1 signals. GPS Solut 16(1):117–126
Jiang K, Li M, Zhao Q, Li W, Guo X (2017) BeiDou geostationary satellite code bias modeling using Fengyun-3C onboard measurements. Sensors 17(11):2460
Lestarquit L, Gregoire Y, Thevenon P (2012) Characterizing the GNSS correlation function using a high gain antenna and long coherent integration—application to signal quality monitoring. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ION PLANS 2012, Myrtle Beach, SC, April 24–26, pp 877–885
Liu J, Ge M (2003) PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 8(2):603–609
Lou Y, Liu Y, Shi C, Yao X, Zheng F (2014) Precise orbit determination of BeiDou constellation based on BETS and MGEX network. Sci Rep 4:4692. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04692
Lou Y, Gong X, Gu S, Zheng F, Feng Y (2017) Assessment of code bias variations of BDS triple-frequency signals and their impacts on ambiguity resolution for long baselines. GPS Solut 21(1):177–186
Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Khachikyan R, Weber G, Langley RB, Mervart L, Hugentobler U (2013) IGS-MGEX: preparing the ground for multi-constellation GNSS science. In: 4th international colloquium on scientific and fundamental aspects of the Galileo system, 4–6 December 2013, Prague, CZ
Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Prange L et al (2017) The multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) of the international GNSS service (IGS)—achievements, prospects and challenges. Adv Space Res 59(7):1671–1697
Nadarajah N, Teunissen P, Raziq N (2013) BeiDou inter-satellite-type bias evaluation and calibration for mixed receiver attitude determination. Sensors 13(7):9435–9463
Nadarajah N, Teunissen P, Sleewaegen J, Montenbruck O (2015) The mixed-receiver BeiDou inter-satellite-type bias and its impact on RTK positioning. GPS Solut 19(3):357–368
Odolinski R, Teunissen P, Odijk D (2014) First combined COMPASS/BeiDou-2 and GPS positioning results in Australia. Part II: single- and multiple-frequency single-baseline RTK positioning. J Spat Sci 59(1):25–46
Pini M, Akos D, Esterhuizen S, Mitelman A (2005) Analysis of GNSS signals as observed via a high gain parabolic antenna. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2005, Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, CA, September 13–16, pp. 1686–1695
Shi C, Yi W, Song W, Lou Y, Yao Y, Zhang R (2013) GLONASS pseudorange inter-channel biases and their effects on combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 17(4):439–451
Shi C, Zheng F, Lou Y, Gu S, Zhang W et al (2017) National BDS augmentation service system (NBASS) of China: progress and assessment. Remote Sens 9(8):837. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080837
Shu B, Liu H, Xu L, Gong X, Qian C, Zhang M, Zhang R (2017) Analysis of satellite-induced factors affecting the accuracy of the BDS satellite differential code bias. GPS Solut 21(3):905–916
Vergara M, Sgammini M, Thoelert S, Enneking C, Zhu Y, Antreich F (2016) Tracking error modeling in presence of satellite imperfections. Navigation 63(1):3–13
Wang G, Jong K, Zhao Q, Hu Z, Guo J (2015) Multipath analysis of code measurements for BeiDou geostationary satellites. GPS Solut 19(1):129–139
Wanninger L, Beer S (2015) BeiDou satellite-induced code pseudorange variations: diagnosis and therapy. GPS Solut 19(4):639–648
Zhang X, He X (2016) Performance analysis of triple-frequency ambiguity resolution with BeiDou observations. GPS Solut 20(2):269–281
Zhao Q, Wang G, Liu Z, Hu Z, Dai Z, Liu J (2016) Analysis of BeiDou satellite measurements with code multipath and geometry-free ionosphere-free combinations. Sensors 16:123. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010123
Zou X, Li Z, Li M, Tang W, Deng C, Chen L, Wang C, Shi C (2017) Modeling BDS pseudorange variations and models assessment. GPS Solut 21(3):1661–1668
Acknowledgements
This study is partially supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (No. 2016YFB0501802), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41504028). The authors show great gratitudes to IGS, Curtin GNSS Research Centre and Survey and Mapping Office of the Lands Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for providing data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, X., Lou, Y., Zheng, F. et al. Evaluation and calibration of BeiDou receiver-related pseudorange biases. GPS Solut 22, 98 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0765-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0765-3